Quote:

the G-man said:
But how does that prove she is wrong?

Basically, you're attacking her simply on the basis of her religion. How...tolerant...of diversity.



Oh, so quick to judge, aren't you?

It proves that she cannot make any form of objective argument, as it's obvious her personal beliefs sway emphasis to her opinions. Even science can be spun. Just ask all the doctors and scientists that support stem-cell. Think they're all wrong?

Quote:

But even if you assume she has a bias based on her personal life, then you need to admit that Fox also has a bias on the basis of his personal life.

So we have two biased individuals. One's a doctor and the other's...an actor.



And yet, only one of them has Parkinsons. Which one?

Quote:

Finally, as noted above, even if you think Fox is correct, the fact of the matter is that he inserted himself into the political debate voluntarily. Are you saying the fact he has a disease makes him, unlike other partisans, somehow immune from criticism or ridicule?



Not at all. And, I never said that. The point, and my opinon following, is that instead of tackling the subject from an objective stand-point, Rush decided to go for a smear tactic and tries to state that Fox is exagerrating his illness, or, isn't taking his meds to garner more pity. That's not only immature, and illogical, it's reprehensible coming from someone who has little to no knowledge of what the fuck he's talking about. Fox is doing this to try and gain push behind the cause of research for an illness. Limbaugh only wants soundbytes. Thus, whether you agree with Fox or not, it's obvious that Rush is just being an asshole...