Quote:

Wednesday said:
Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
If you understood the rules going in why should a "No Mod" voter get special treatment then the rest of us? Did any of the disenfranchised feel that they would get to vote twice if "no mod" looked like it wasn't going to win the first time they voted???


Speaking for myself, I didn't feel disenfranchised until Rob's count illustrated why this doesn't really work. And, really, I'm still willing to go this way if Rob thinks it's best.



I guess I don't think it's fair changing things at this point. It may have made sense having just a mod or no mod vote first but at this point hypothetically some people are seeing potential results they might not care for & want a redo. That's not fair to everyone else.

Fair play!