Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
]as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.



Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods.



No.

A "single vote" for "no mods" is just that. One vote. "No Mod" gets one vote and only one, from that voter. That voter gets one vote.

In contrast, a "single vote" for a slate of mods (for example: Uschi, Sneaky, Doc) results in three votes from a voter: One for Uschi, one for Sneaky, one for Doc. Each of which goes towards that person's total number of votes.



You can't go back and vote for Gore because you figured out that Nader was losing. It's like those questions you'd see on tests or applications. "Did you go to college? (If yes, then where.)"

Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

I really don't care how this election comes out. Notice that I have not once said anything about my nomination one way or the other. I'll go with the flow on this. I don't really give a damn.



Of course you care. We all care. Otherwise, (a) we wouldn't vote; (b) you wouldn't have run.



(a) I haven't voted. (b) I haven't run.

Thanks for playing.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."