Quote:

Wednesday said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:

rob's right, i don't see how this could unclear.

if those who wanted no mods wanted to vote for mods they wouldn't of voted for no mods.



That's easy for you to say. You're in second place. You're getting what you want.



Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
me
pariah
uschi


Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
pariah - 111
Uschi - 1111111111111
Sneaky - 1111111111
[/LIST]





no i'm not.

Quote:


Now I'll argue for what I want. G-man's right, there should have been two elections. One for whether or not there would be mods, and one for who those mods should be (in that order for obvious reasons). Principally, those are two separate issues--the existence of mods and who, if any, those mods should be. It's akin to asking us how many AND who on the same ballot. In fact, that's exactly what it is. So, yeah, I'm not even concerned about how much one should weigh in comparison to another, per se, cuz it's apples and oranges.

But whatever. Seems the majority DO want mods (though I wonder if that would have been the case had the question been asked the way G-man proposed). Still, I've believed from the start that this should be Rob's decision. His boards, his rules. If this is the way he wants it, cool. I've added my two other votes already. I just hope they'll be considered, since I obviously didn't know the rules beforehand.


if this is such an issue for you and the others and you weren't clear on the concept of the process maybe you should of made that clear before voting began or you casted your vote. not after when things aren't "going your way".

Quote:

Uschi said:
This is technically what you all want, just all rolled into one. You vote for mod or no mod and if you want a mod you also vote for the choices available. Nobody said you COULDN'T say
Quote:

I vote no mod. in the case that this fails, here are the mods I would prefer.

so do it and let Rob decide. Like Wednesday did a page and a half ago that got totally jumped over in the conversation until just a post or two ago.


actually, if you read rob's first post in this thread the "or a requst for 'no mod'" would leave one to assume that its one or the other.

Quote:


Besides, it is just a message board moderator for one forum. Since G-Man's not in the running I really don't think there's anything to fear of someone going overboard. I, for one, am proposing a light moderating example with a minimum of effort. I have a goddamn life, you know? And it isn't like a moderator has SO MUCH POWER! Christ, they won't bomb the UN. This isn't an earth-shattering vote. This is like voting for the kind of pizza you and your friends are going to buy.