Quote:

Pig Iran said:
If you take the photo yourself or pay someone to do it -it's your art. you can copy it all you want. if you pay a model to pose-the poses and time are yours...you paid for them.



Quote:

Grimm said:
Quote:

harleykwin said:
Quote:

Pig Iran said:
Well, a photo is a copyrighted piece of someone else's work-which is called art. Byrne or whoever can copy another artists work as an homage if they put "after Kirby" or some such which establishes that the pose and layout was copied as an homage of a great piece of work.

By all accounts Land, Liefeld, Lee or whoever should put "after ansel adams" or whoever if they copy a photo for reference. It's not such a big deal with guns, appliances, cars, or furniture which are pretty generic visually. But basing your work on photos or video of rebecca romjin or any other model is copyright infringement if the artist wanted to pursue it.

If you reference that you "copied" the image and give credit it's fine I believe.




But then, using a picture of, say, a friend or a personal photo as a reference would be deemed "copied" - how do you distinguish using a reference picture from using a known picture? Is there a difference? Both are essentially doing the same thing...



I would say the difference lies in whether you took the picture, or if you used something that you found somewhere else.



Dude, I think there's an echo in here...


Dear, sweet Harley Kwink...I'm madly in love with you. Marry me! We can go to Canadia. Or Boston or something. It'll be grand...You know the cookies are a given. They are ALWAYS a given. You could dump me tomorrow and you'd still get the cookies. Boston..shit, wherever dyke weddings were legalized. And where better to rub their little piggie noses in how bad they suck than right on their doorstep? What are they gonna do? Be jealous of you? Stare furiously at your tah-tahs? Not willingly give you cookies, but instead begrudgingly give you their cookies? Woman, time to wake up to the powers you wield - Uschi