Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man


Like your Vince Foster speculation I'm pretty clear that it's me guessing that is what Bush will do. At any rate time will tell if I'm right. Personally I feel accusing somebody of cold blooded murder should require far more than you've ever presented.



Time will tell.

I've made the argument for Clinton conspiracy in the Vince Foster death across a number of topics over the years.

  • Foster was left handed, the gun was found in his right hand.
  • His wound would have caused a lot of bleeding, but there was little blood where his body was found, indicating he was moved to the park where he was found, after his death.
  • Pressure was given to have Foster's death investigated by local police, rather than FBI, who would have been more likely to find additional evidence.
  • At precisely the time Foster's body was found, files were already being cleared out of Foster's office.



In addition, DNC-chair/Commerce Secretary Ron Brown was under investigation for pending indictment, and he basically said "If I'm going down, I'm not going down alone." A few days later, he went down over Bosnia, in a plane, and was never heard from again.

There are many other allegations against the Clintons. Regarding Whitewater, the McDougals were imprisoned, one died of cancer in jail, the other was pardoned by Clinton when leaving office (indistinguishable from Bush, if Bush pardons Libby as you speculate, before he leaves office).

My point is, in answer to your statement, there is plenty of circumstantial evidence against bill and Hillary, but not enough to convict the Clintons, beyond what has already been proven.

But there is no lack of arguments to assert my belief in their guilt. I also can accept they might not be guilty of these other charges, but there is some considerable basis for my beliefs, in how much Bill Clinton denied, that he was found to be unquestionably guilty of.