Originally Posted By: Pariah
I dunoo...They usually work for people who haven't been desensitized by an argument they just don't want to have to deal with anymore. I know repetition isn't very finesseful nuance, but truth doesn't really suffer entropy.

 Originally Posted By: whomod
As for the rest, Rex summed it up nicely


It's kinda sad that you have to hide behind rex.


Pundits are like lawyers. They'll argue a point, no matter how disproven just to be the voice of the opposition (or to defend failed policy because it's their sides policy). If you have facts and truth on your side, then I think, You don't have to resort to personal attacks, diversions and flat out falsehoods like saying Al Queda is the #1 enemy in Iraq or linking 9/11 and Iraq or Osama Bin Laden etc.

Yes, that goes for both the right and left. With Iraq though, the right has a pretty shoddy track record in the truth department so they're not exactly coming at people willing to give them a wide latitude for trust anymore.

As for "hiding behind" Rex. I think I've made similar postings in regards to Wonder Boy in the past. That Rex beat me to it either shows he's a plagiarist, like minded, or he just knows who he's ridiculing. I choose the latter.

Now why would YOU phrase it like that though? Who's hiding? Why would I hide? Everything here seems like a bulb goes off in ones head that says, Wonder Boy is on MY SIDE therefore I have to run in and defend him and mock the one 'attacking' him. At least it SEEMS that way to me. Maybe I'm wrong.