Originally Posted By: whomod
Pundits are like lawyers. They'll argue a point, no matter how disproven just to be the voice of the opposition (or to defend failed policy because it's their sides policy). If you have facts and truth on your side, then I think, You don't have to resort to personal attacks, diversions and flat out falsehoods like saying Al Queda is the #1 enemy in Iraq or linking 9/11 and Iraq or Osama Bin Laden etc.

Yes, that goes for both the right and left. With Iraq though, the right has a pretty shoddy track record in the truth department so they're not exactly coming at people willing to give them a wide latitude for trust anymore.


Assuming I agreed with you, you're not talking to pundits here.

 Quote:
As for "hiding behind" Rex. I think I've made similar postings in regards to Wonder Boy in the past. That Rex beat me to it either shows he's a plagiarist, like minded, or he just knows who he's ridiculing. I choose the latter.

Now why would YOU phrase it like that though? Who's hiding? Why would I hide? Everything here seems like a bulb goes off in ones head that says, Wonder Boy is on MY SIDE therefore I have to run in and defend him and mock the one 'attacking' him. At least it SEEMS that way to me. Maybe I'm wrong.


.....Why did you even come back? It seems like all you're doing right now is copy/pasting articles, like before, and inviting arguments. But after Wonder Boy responds to you, you forfeit the discussion and just call him racist or insane. At least pre-exodus you actually had the impetus to respond fully to most of what people had to say.

I'm not so much trying to sponsor him as I am trying to criticize you. Rex's post was sweeping and inflammatory, but that's the nature of a troll after all. You, on the other hand, are trying to pass yourself off as a semblence of reason and intelligent debate, but you use Rex's post to try and sound witty. Bad form.