With all due respect, MEM, I think that you've become so wrapped up in places like Media Matters and RAW Story, that you've lost a certain ability to analyze things objectively or independently.
Stories or spin trickle down from the Clintons (and other powerful democrats) through the media and the liberal blogs and, given your natural inclination towards the left, you just jump on them, not realizing that it makes you look like a flip flopper or someone who changes positions on a daily basis to parrot whatever talking point trickled down that week. Without that spin, you don't seem to have a position, or even knowledge of the issue at hand.
This is a good example: How could somone such as yourself, who seems to be so interested in politics have not known that Huckabee's primary political raison d'erte is the "family values/anti-day" issue? The guy is a Babtist minister, for God's sake (pun intended).
I'll take you at your word that this didn't start with spin from the Clintons, but given the blatancy at which Huckabee has courted the religious right, you have to admit that it was an easy assumption for me to make.
Oh G-man it's just your spin when it comes to blaming everything on Clinton. Right now your working that talking point so much that it's just blatently obvious. Your Hillary's hit men thread's first post is an editorial by a writer funded by Scaife for petes sake.
As for Huckabee, I don't follow the GOP candidates that much. I did catch a couple of his appearences & he was a very good speaker & he didn't get into the marriage ammendment stuff. So I can be honest an admit I made a mistake in my previous "not planting another Bush" post.
