RKMBs Forums .::Important::. Politics and Current Events Bush threatens to veto anti-torture bill

More factless insults on your part.



I don't need to "kiss Rob's ass."
What would that possibly gain me, even if I did? You can be polite to Rob, or say "fuck you, Rob Kamphausen," as many here have, often playfully, sometimes angrily, and it won't get you banned or cause you any hardhip or favor here. To allege otherwise is a bullshit argument.

I've had some harsh words with Rob, mostly about the way he runs his boards, allowing slanderous mean-spirited pieces of shit like you to run wild here.



You mean I actually criticized your slanderous attacks on myself, G-man, and on conservatives in general?
That I pointed out your blatant factual innacuracies, and offered verifying facts to disprove your false arguments?

For example, to factually disprove how you portray Hitler as a "good Christian", when in fact he was, while giving lip-service to Christianity, in truth was just out-maneuvering Christians politically, in movement toward the goal of eradicating and/or imprisoning all Christians, and that many Christians risked their lives in Germany to openly criticize Hitler, and wound up by the thousands in concentration camps?

Yeah, that's pretty underhanded of me, to factually dispute your arguments, rather than just factlessly slander you, as you constantly do me, where you constantly blanket-label me a "racist", every time I disagree with your political views. When in truth I clearly interact with, and have friends of, many other races and cultures, even gays, who I politically disagree with, but do not hate.

I simply advocate other means than you do to acheive equality, true equality, and an absence of race-consciousness, by taking away the training wheels of minority quotas, awarding SAT points to minorities, and constant re-dredging of past racism, to bring about a unified society, instead of endless white apologies that liberals indulge in, which just makes minorities even more hostile to whites.
Real equality, rewarding only real merit. Not liberal exploitation of race politics for political gain, and socialist handouts to those who haven't earned them, and depriving those who have earned them, in some perverted liberal notion of social justice.



In other words (ignoring your usual over-the-top inflammatory personal insults) you have a different point of view, and since you can't dispute me on the facts, you engage in vindictive insults and character assassination.

You know calling me a racist is a lie.

You know calling me a pedophile is a lie. (I didn't excuse Mark Foley, but you did excuse Gerry Studds. Who's the true pedophile advocate, Ray?)


The bottom line is, regarding race issues, I just advocate a different approach than you do: dealing with the real issue, of flawed liberal ideology that perpetuates racial division, and not heaping all the blame on white America.

The way liberal views are set up, all the blame belongs on white America, and only whites are capable of racism.
Whereas the truth is, all races engage in racism to some degree. Blacks in Africa --who began slavery hundreds of years before they began selling slaves to Europeans, and continued the slave trade hundreds of years after-- are just as guilty regarding black slavery, but are somehow absolved of guilt.


There are social reasons, within their respective ethnic communities, that more blacks and hispanics drop out of school and don't pursue higher education, and are more likely to get involved in drugs, crime, etc., than other racial groups.

We shouldn't sweep all those causes under the rug and say that's just "diversity" and that anyone who points out the achievement gap between blacks and hispanics (vs. that of whites and asians).
And we shouldn't allow anyone who dares to point out the core problem to be blanket-labelled a "racist".

We should instead start dealing with the core social reasons that blacks and hispanics are not achieving the same level, and bring them up to the level of other racial groups. Not lower national standards, and harass anyone who dares to say what the problem is, as yourself and other liberals have been doing for 40 years.

I describe your tactics as "typical liberal arguments" because they are consistent issue-dodging personal attacks used by liberals, to silence their opponents without addressing the real issue.

There is not one time that I deliberately misrepresented you, or engaged in the kind of vicious attacks on me that you vomit out pretty much every day: