Originally Posted By: the G-man
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man

The "evidence" is Insight Magazine, National Review Online blog & other agenda driven conservative sources opinionating but not having any actual proof.


I didn't realize that the Boston Globe, the Washington Post, and, of all things, the Huffington Post were now "agenda driven conservative sources." Each one, and dozens of other mainstream news organizations, have tied Hillary staffers to these rumors.

Better log in to Hillary's Media Matters and get a new talking point, MEM. This latest one isn't working.


You provided some links but no proof to your talking points G-man. Sure Obama & his campaign are going to try to milk this. They want to win. It seems you want him to win the nomination too. The "evidence" all amounts to a couple of incidents where we know about them because the campaign hasn't tolerated the "Obama is a Muslim" bs that you used to work so hard at convincing people was true. If somebody from Hillary's campaign is caught doing something like that, their fired. What more can any campaign do?

Fair play!