Originally Posted By: whomod
I'm glad we clarified that then.

So now you have no problem with women in nontraditional roles and with homosexuals?



I have a problem with women in non-traditional roles when they neglect their children to pursue their careers, and when they cease having children at replacement-population levels at all.

I read an article recently that millions of women in the last decade have started stay-at-home businesses, so they can have a career and still be around to raise and be with their children.

The two options for women (careers, and traditional motherhood) aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. But liberal feminism teaches a view that "housewife" and "stay-at-home mom", are pejoratives.
And even view "marriage" as slavery.

Liberalism, as envisioned by Gramsci and the Frankfurt School of marxists (from which 60's liberalism has directly sprung from) want nothing less than the abolishment of families, christianity, and democracy itself, to be replaced by a socialist ideology and state.
Liberals see their political views as a benign movement, but they don't see the end result that their marxist leaders envision. Liberal teachings of environmentalism and overpopulation, and material secularism, discourage having children.

As I've said many times, a human race, a civilization, that chooses not to reproduce and continue itself, is morally sick and on a path toward self-destruction.
Within 40 years, Western civilization will be overwhelmed by foreign immigration and cease to exist. In Europe, they will replace their democracy with an islamic government. In the U.S., it will be a welfare state overwhelmed with Mexicans and central Americans, that resembles the governments, corruption, high taxes and class extremes of Cental American and South Americans states.

This is the fruit of radical feminism and other allied liberal corruptions of the United States.



I like and socialize with gay people, as individual friends and co-workers. I took my girlfriend to a New Years Eve party, where a good percentage of the people there were gay, and I enjoyed talking to everyone there.

But the larger gay community, as a political movement, is part of the movement to strangle all reference to our national origins from Christianity, is part of the liberalism that encourages globalism, encourages excessive guilt over past racism that seeks to undermine will to be patriotic and defend our nation, that advocates removal of the Ten Commandments and all other Christian references from our government and schools, that advocates declaring private free practice of Christian teachings that homosexuality is immoral to be a "hate-crime" (as they already have in Canada), and that otherwise silences Christian political ability to advocate the issues important to them, as every other political group in the U.S. has the right to.
To do this, gay activists, in collaboration with other secularist liberals, abuse and misrepresent "separation of church and state" and utilize fear tactics to suppress Christian political representation, and our Christian heritage.