I have a problem with women in non-traditional roles when they neglect their children to pursue their careers, and when they cease having children at replacement-population levels at all.
so free will and how they choose to live their lives should come after some baby-making quota? you do realize the population has gone up 2 or 3 times in just the last 30 years.
And I ask you if this is really about having babies and not about keeping women subservient in the home, why don't you advocate stay at home fathers?
The two options for women (careers, and traditional motherhood) aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. But liberal feminism teaches a view that "housewife" and "stay-at-home mom", are pejoratives.
And even view "marriage" as slavery.
You act like it's some sort of secret conspiracy. It's just a different view in terms of what options are available in life. Women have only had the option to actually live a life of their own choosing for 30 or so years. Men have always had the right to do whatever they please, it smacks of insecurity to be so fearful of change.
Liberalism, as envisioned by Gramsci and the Frankfurt School of marxists (from which 60's liberalism has directly sprung from) want nothing less than the abolishment of families, christianity, and democracy itself, to be replaced by a socialist ideology and state.

Liberals see their political views as a benign movement, but they don't see the end result that their marxist leaders envision. Liberal teachings of environmentalism and overpopulation, and material secularism, discourage having children.
wow. you're so fucking crazy and so fucking wrong. Liberals want people to have freedom in their lives. Ultimately Liberalism is more towards the aim of free will, a gift from God (or Allah). One could argue that conservatives trying to impose their views and "morals" on to others violates the free will that God (or Allah) gave humanity.
And overpopulation is bad. Look at what happens when you cram too many people together. You get disease, you get pollution, you get poverty.
As I've said many times, a human race, a civilization, that chooses not to reproduce and continue itself, is morally sick and on a path toward self-destruction.
how many kids do you have?
Within 40 years, Western civilization will be overwhelmed by foreign immigration and cease to exist.
But we're all humans. Why does it matter where those demographics come from? Unless this is an issue of race for you, you should be more relaxed about the fact that humanity has gone up by the billions since 1950.
And if this is another Mexican thing, well Mexico is part of Western Civilization.
In Europe, they will replace their democracy with an islamic government. In the U.S., it will be a welfare state overwhelmed with Mexicans and central Americans, that resembles the governments, corruption, high taxes and class extremes of Cental American and South Americans states.
so basically this is a race war for you, right? more white people to stop the evil invaders?
This is the fruit of radical feminism and other allied liberal corruptions of the United States.
wow. I bet some girl with a Jimmy Carter button turned you down for a date once and you've just been burning with hatred ever since.
I like and socialize with gay people, as individual friends and co-workers. I took my girlfriend to a New Years Eve party, where a good percentage of the people there were gay, and I enjoyed talking to everyone there.
we're talking about gay people now?
But the larger gay community, as a political movement, is part of the movement to strangle all reference to our national origins from Christianity, is part of the liberalism that encourages globalism and guilt over past racism that seeks to undermine will to be patriotic and defend our nation, that advocates removal of the Ten Commandments and all other Christian references from our government and schools, advocates declaring private free practice of Christian teachings that homosexuality is immoral to be a "hate-crime" (as they already have in Canada), and otherwise silence Christian political ability to advocate the issues important to them, as every other political group in the U.S. has the right to. To do this, gay activists, in collaboration with other secularist liberals, abuse and misrepresent "separation of church and state" and utilize fear tactics to suppress Christian political representation, and our Christian heritage.
wow. you like gay people but you want it to be taught that they're sinners? somehow the gays are responsible for the removal of ten commandments, and not the fact that the constitution requires a church/state separation and as time goes on your little fairy tales belief become less and less important.
And no one is silencing christians. for god sakes you have the president as a hardcore "boner for jesus" type. Your message is out there, most people just don't take it seriously. you're talking about morality tales from a 2000 year old story book that also condones slavery and advocates stoning someone for working on the sabbath.
and you also have to consider that most christian political types are like you, talking about the love of christ and how much you hate liberals in the same sentence. if you don't even follow the teachings of peace and forgiveness how do you expect to sway anyone.