Originally Posted By: britneyspearsatemyshorts
a link from a liberal site that twists the facts. it must be true!



How were the facts twisted? (Seriously, go ahead. Give me sources that proves this article wrong.) Or is it just because it's a liberal site, it must automatically be false?

 Originally Posted By: the G-man
Matt probably doesn't realize who David Brock is. He's the guy that runs Hillary Clinton's "Media Matters" site.


Again, because an uber-liberal says it, it's automatically false?

Or is it just because any article from any biased source is suspect, regardless of allegiance?

If that's the case, what do you suggest we do, not post anything from any site with biases and agendas? That would make a hell of a lot of websites and newspapers off-limits.

Go ahead, gimme an answer. I want to learn the ways of the Source and be an RKMBer like my original ID before me.

Oh, I'm also invoking the G-Man Doctrine, wherein it states that a question mark at the end of a comment means I'm just raising a question instead of actually making a claim. ;\)

This is not vengeance. This is pun-ishment.

"The goodness of the true pun is in the direct ratio of its intolerability." — Edgar Allan Poe