RKMBs Forums .::Important::. off topic and offensive posts Why is daddy talking in different voices?

Did you see this, Pariah? http://www.rkmbs.com/...rt/2#Post950130

No, no, no.

Just the people who desperately try to contradict me in a whining fashion qualify. I wouldn't really use the word contradict so much as flame. Contradict would indicate the possibility of a intelligent argument which none of you have offered. Sammitch came close, but in the end it was just a heap of whining about how bad a person Halo is.

Of course he saw it. He's Whomod's Daughter. Feels weird typing that.

Well I'll be damned.

Academy award material.

So, basically, everyone who disagrees with you whom you can automatically label as stupid. Got it.

No, everyone who disagrees with me in a whining fashion is a whiner. You maybe you should try to figure out tic tac toe before continuing with this conversation. Might sharpen your brain.

I enjoy making syllogism much more than tic tac toe.

Similar to the logic in which you can simply say "I WIN!" and have you friends consider you as both the winner and a bitchslapper. or where you can make as many homersexual jokes as you want, but when we do the same, were" fourth graders who can't think up good insults"

Tu quoque, Brute, fili mi.

If you didn't take the internet so seriously, you'd be able to join in. Alas, you're just too uptight and retarded.

Actually, it doesn't. Try again.



Sorry Confucius, but your "pedophile" cat-calls haven't, and won't, make me lose sleep.

That sounds more like your own personal character flaw.

Such vague denial is akin to a admission of guilt. It is also the ultimate weakness.



Not a cat call. Merely an observation of you contradicting yourself.

It's a sad day when Dr Fate stoops to petty bickering.

No guilt, no weakness, no contradictions. Just your own bias.

Way to prove his point, pedophile

That his standards are bias? He didn't need me to prove that.

Denial will get you nowhere dude.

But what does an Egyptian river have to do with his bias?

Correct term is "bare defence."

There's no weakness in a bare defence. It just puts the proponent to proof.

Stick to fighting crime, kid.

Dave once used that argument in court and convinced the judge so much that they lowered the voltage for the electric chair

they also struck down Australia's oppressive "pants law"!

It's a hell of a thing pantsing a man.
You take away all the pants he has.
you take away all the pants he ever will have.

4.Logical SLOC measures attempt to measure the number of "statements", but their specific definitions are tied to specific computer languages (one simple logical SLOC measure for C-like programming languages is the number of statement-terminating semicolons). It is much easier to create tools that measure physical SLOC, and physical SLOC definitions are easier to explain. However, physical SLOC measures are sensitive to logically irrelevant formatting and style conventions, while logical SLOC is less sensitive to formatting and style conventions. Unfortunately, SLOC measures are often stated without giving their definition, and logical SLOC can often be significantly different from physical SLOC.

160