So...me saying that I made a generic insult to Nowhereman about his mom is disqualified by me making a generic insult to Nowhereman about his mom?
no worries, i'll walk y'through it.
you said you "made a generic crack about Nowherebrains mom." i responded with your reference to the actual quote, which referred to nowhereman's perversion and incest with his mother, who has passed away. she was an individual that meant the world to him, and revisiting your commentary again, it seems a little more than a "generic crack"
now, its likely your argument will now be that "generic" is a relative term, or some such silliness. in which case, you just get yerself a nice little gold star.
so thats quote one. y'with me still?
in quote 2, you said that we are extremists who are silly to create stories about you, like "you all must think you're are morally superior." my response was in two parts, one was zap's quote, about how you insurgentians should "grab the moral highground" -- the other was your own, stating "We claim moral superiority again and again."
so, as you'll note, both of those quotes from zap and yourself seem to counter your other point fairly directly.
and that, dear friend, is the reason i posted them for you. i found it funny (that's why i said "heh") that you were trying to rewrite the past by redefining what you had already done or said. when, in reality, looking at your actual words, they're in direct contrast to one another.
no, that is not what i asked, nor was it what you were looking for in your own clarification. again, no worries. i'll walk you through this, as well. originally, i said i (and we, as a whole) enjoy toying with you because its funny. you said that i couldn't prove i was enjoying it. so i was asking what evidence i'd need to present to you to prove i enjoyed laughing at your expense and that i enjoy(ed) your continued torment.
please advise.
Let's see. In the six months I was here as a normal poster you altered...nobodies account. So yeah, it's out of the ordinary.
how would you know that? or why would you think you know that?
i mean, at the very
least, in the same thread where you discovered your screen name had changed colors, joe mama noticed his own screen name had changed colors, as well. if i recall, these discoveries were within a few posts of one another. if you didn't notice that one, you can't expect you'd notice others.
Oh, so it's funny that you guys talk about us all the time but for us it's obsession? That's some double standard you got going.
its not a double standard. in fact, to most of the people in your tribe, there is no difference with us. they are (or were) all having fun with it, as well. but for you, and a few select others over there, it has become an obsession. you're clearly not having fun. you're angry. you're frustrated. you're trying so desperately to win
something, when that very path guarantees failure. i'd wager the rkmbs is something you think about off line, as well. that is where all your "lose" comes from.
totally describes you and the other imbeciles of this board. Reading the Insurgency anonymously
i dont think anyone here read your old forum anonymously, unless they weren't allowed to register / log in. the only reason anyone here would sign up there (which never included me) would be to post on the boards and fuck with them.
i don't know what that is.
discussing us over pms (same fucking thing as a "private clubhouse")
how would you know if that were true or not? its certainly not something i've done. it wouldn't even make much sense
to do it, we have nothing to hide. we have nothing to
plan. the grand bible is "see wanky, make fun of wanky, cyber high five one another, illegally vote republican twice"
its out in the open.
saying that our posts don't bother you yet fussing about sigs
your posts bother no one here. honestly. i can't stress that enough. everything you say is humorous. whether its in this current revisionist mode, your war raiding mode, or your green lanterning mode. we enjoy your posts.
the only one who ever fussed over your sig was me. and it was never an issue of content, simply a practicality of the forum's program. i also wouldn't allow you to install windows vista on my server, or smear my monitor with your tears. content-wise, you can say whatever you want. anyone can. you can yell at me or say these boards are too gray or even make liberal statements. you've always known that, and if not, you should by now.
but above and beyond the notion that i don't dislike your posts or your content, its quite the opposite -- i like them! i don't want you to stop posting here. i
enjoy your posts. they make me happy and they make me money. they stir up discussion and fun for everyone. i, of course, want that to continue. truthfully, i wish your raid was still "rampaging" the boards here in the doses and groups from a month or two back, before you lost your forum. at the very least, i'd dub that period of time inspiring for post content.
please note the quote commentary above.
making your long posts (that according to you all constitutes a "meltdown")
no, i've already clarified this earlier tonight. long posts don't necessarily mean anything.
and let's not forget your "Insurgency Roast" forum.
again, previously clarified. its all in jest. mockery in the form of comedy. you know, like a "roast" (!!!)
"heh", the deluded ramblings of internet morons such as yourselves isn't admissable in court.
please don't use my "heh."
your response is appreciated
best,
rob