Originally Posted By: The Dread Pirate Westley
I have no problem doing an about-face on any issue, but you do have to meet some sort of burden. Casting doubt through questionable assumptions isn't the same as proof.


That's too simplistic a description of the critique. These are hardly "assumptions" of error. They're pointing out that our knowledge of how much time has passed is too arbitrary to properly judge the amount of daughter cells that may or may not have been present in the isotopes to start with.