. Less han 24 hours afer my last post, Elon Musk opted o restore Sarlink and other tech services to Ukraine.
Ukraine's Starlink restored as Elon Musk claims Kyiv violated terms of service 'to kill people' SpaceX CEO says company has done more to defend Ukraine than any private firm 'by far'
So that undermines your talking points. Despite that Ukraine violated the terms he conditioned Starlink service to Ukraine on, it appears Musk is more concerned about saving lives than about Ukraine keeping their terms.
You know who serves Russia, M E M? Your Democrat propaganda machine.
And by the way, as I've cited before, U S aid to Ukraine far eclipses aid from all the nations of the E U combined. What the EU purchases in Russian oil, is on the net far more than they give in aid to Ukraine. So on the net, the E U nations are actually supporting Russian genocide, rather than Ukraine.
So aid to Ukraine really amounts to... Trump. And Musk.
Your guarantees mean very little to me WB. It boils down to political violence is ok with MAGA when they do it.
Meanwhile Trump has ordered the DOJ to interfere with the election results in Alaska if the republican loses. Prior to Trump, the DOJ was expected to be independent and working for the American people. I think everyone is prepared for more to come as Trump is very unpopular even in republican polls. We already know what he does when he loses.
NO.
In the examples I cited, it boils down to Democrats orchestrating and committing violence.
And Republicans are consistently falsely ACCUSED of violence, often in situations where Democrat agitators or false-flag paid thugs do the violence, and then blame Republicans for their own (Democrat-Bolshevik) bad acts. The violent situations DEMOCRATS actually created. When opponents of Democrats, including the police, ICE agents and Border Patrol act with lawful restraint, Democrats use false-flag agents or trained/paid leftist agitators, try to overwhelm law enforcement, hoping police/ICE/BP/Republicans will make a mistake. And then the Democrats use the incident that THEY DELIBERATELY CAUSED as a rationalization for more rioting, and more violence.
Your Democrat-Bolshevik party at work. A party built on on deception. And Marxism. Funded over many decades by the Soviet Union, the Chinese Communist Party, globalist Marxists like the George Soros web of front-groups, Neville Roy Singham, Jamie Pritzger, and billionaire LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman. Black Lives Matter. Anifa. Anti-Ice. The Open Borders movement. Occupy Wall Street. "No Kings".
And in recent years, joined by the Democratic Socialists of America, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the islamic government of Iran ("death to America").
What more proof is needed, that the Democrat party is the CHOSEN INSTRUMENT for those who want to destroy the United States? Destroying from without, and from within.
And the polls you cite are DEMOCRAT polls, as they have been since Michael Dukakis ran for president in 1988. The polls showed Dukakis winning by 17 points. How did that actually work out? G H W Bush won, by a landslide in the other direction. Same thing in 2016. Same in 2024.
The polls are largely done by liberals, and they are consistently wrong, and BY THE WEIRDEST COINCIDENCE, always in favor of the Democrats. They are a form of psychological warfare on Republican voters, done to suppress Republican voter turnout, to convince Republicans their candidate can't win. To make them give up and stay home.
I've posted here many times, Democrat pollsters over-sample Democrat opinion, over-sampling about 10% more than there are Democrats in the population, so lo and behold, polls always show Democrats winning. Even when Democrats actually end up winning, polls consistently show Dems winning at a much higher ratio than they actually do on election day. And conversely, polls show Trump retaining voter support like no Republican president in history. As Harry Entin cited on CNN, about 99% of Trump voters remain supportive of Trump. They know the Democrat alternative is like voting Lenin and Stalin in 1917.
Already posted at least once before how the 97 percent figure is deceptive. It’s a very small percentage that actually donate anything. And in this administration you were probably targeted if you were a democrat. Or if you were assigned on any investigation on the orange fraudster.
And I already posted that far beyond just political donations by FBI/DOJ, there has been massive cover-ups in multiple FBI scandals over the last 20 years a least, that shows a high ratio of FBI/DOJ agents are complicit in covering up abuses in FBI/DOJ. Two FBI agents just today were forced to give testimony about their PROVEN false previous statements about what they knew about he Hunter Biden laptop before he 2020 election, vs. what they said previously under oath.
So far as I've been able to see over the last 10 years, there are NO SITUATIONS, NONE, where you acknowledge there has been ANY criminal partisan political abuse of FBI power, by ANY agent, not even Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, or dozens of others in FBI leadership forced to resign or be fired over the last 8 years. And after resigning or being fired for what they did in 2016-2017, then at their new jobs in social media, they coordinated with other Democrat-Bolsheviks who remained in FBI/DOJ and CIA, to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, AGAIN, during the Nov 2020 election, to rig the election for Joe Biden by suppressing the vote.
So... your proving to be an obscenely partisan Democrat-Bolshevik yourself, I don't see how you have exhibited any objectivity when it comes to recognizing FBI corruption, the extent of it, or having the understanding, or even the DESIRE, to weed it out or punish it. Quite the opposite, you seem to cheer on past abuse. And cheer on re-weaponizing the FBI as soon as Trump leaves office, at whatever point Democrats regain power.
Likewise, you are absolutely tone-deaf to the FB/DOJ abuses of power in the Mar A Lago raid (even leaders in the FBI now acknowledge there was no justification for a warrant, to have done that raid). And you are likewise one-deaf to the outrageous Constitutional abuses in the four made-up fake trials directed by Merrick Garland and Joe Biden's DOJ, WHILE TRUMP WAS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, no less. BIDEN'S POLITICAL OPPONENT ! Nope, nothing to see here, nothing at all...
You cheer on every abuse of power, in setting up a one-party authoritarian Democrat-Bolshevik permanent takeover, and shredding the Constitution and checks and balances in the process to do so.
And I JUST CITED, ONE POST ABOVE], sourced and linked, an article that shows a similar 90% to 99% infiltration, the same Democrat-partisan corruption, in at least 17 other federal agencies. Likely all of them. FACT. Cited. Sourced.
Already posted at least once before how the 97 percent figure is deceptive. It’s a very small percentage that actually donate anything. And in this administration you were probably targeted if you were a democrat. Or if you were assigned on any investigation on the orange fraudster.
Your guarantees mean very little to me WB. It boils down to political violence is ok with MAGA when they do it.
Meanwhile Trump has ordered the DOJ to interfere with the election results in Alaska if the republican loses. Prior to Trump, the DOJ was expected to be independent and working for the American people. I think everyone is prepared for more to come as Trump is very unpopular even in republican polls. We already know what he does when he loses.
Looking at what Musk has said vs the Trump administration on the slow down in Ukraine, both sides seem to be claiming not to be responsible for the decision. Musk has said that Trump is ultimately responsible for those types of slow downs, the WSJ is reporting that it was more a Musk decision. Neither is taking the blame. This intentional slow down did aid Russia in its war on Ukraine. As did Trump’s decision to buy Russian oil. I find it hard to believe our government would let Musk do something like that unless they okayed it. I think Musk either got permission or was even asked by Trump to basically aid Russia in this way.
If it was somehow just Musk and the us government really has no control over that type of power, that needs to change! It’s pretty dangerous to let one unelected person have that much power. I really don’t think that’s the case here though. Sadly I think Trump gave Musk the ok. Ukraine has been hitting Russian data centers and energy. This resulted in an at least a temporary drop in Russian bot activity and higher fuel prices. Trump would see those as threats to republicans with the midterms.
And from DETECTIVE COMICS 455, Jan 1976, an 18-page story by Elliot Maggin, with art by Mile Grell. Where Bruce Wayne and Alfred are driving through a rural area, and when their car breaks down they look for help in what appears to be an old long abandoned home, and inadvertantly awaken a long-dormant vampire, ending up in a fight for their lives.
I'd love to re-post the one from BATMAN FAMILY 1 also. But ReadAllComics.com has been down since about July 1st, and no other site I've been abIe to find has it up elsewhere. I hope they bring it back, ReadAllComics' down-status has remained down since early July. But they were down for about a year previously, and then came back, so there is some hope it'll be restored.
Federal government employees are opening their wallets to help Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump on Nov. 8.
Of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign, according to an analysis by The Hill.
Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart. Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.
Employees of the Department of Justice, which investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of State, gave Clinton 97 percent of their donations. Trump received $8,756 from DOJ employees compared with $286,797 for Clinton. From IRS employees, Clinton received 94 percent of donations.
Federal government employees overwhelmingly backed Clinton’s presidential campaign no matter which agency The Hill analyzed using Federal Election Commission data covering donors giving more than $200.
Trump campaign spokesman Jason Miller said these donation patterns are more evidence of the “rigged system” favoring establishment candidates like Clinton over outsiders like Trump. The Trump campaign has been citing lopsided media donations to Clinton — though there’s no evidence they’re coming from reporters covering Trump — as further evidence that the game is fixed.
But David Schultz, a Hamline University Professor of Political Science, said government employees have historically favored Democratic candidates over Republicans both in their voting habits and political contributions made in their personal time.
Under the Hatch Act, federal government employees are banned from engaging in political activities, including making campaign contributions, during work hours.
“Government employees are, on balance, more moderate or more liberal as opposed to the general population,” Schultz said. “Not across the board, but in general.”
Government employees are “more likely to believe in government as opposed to, let’s say, a privatization program,” he added, “programs that we would view as hostile to government.”
Republicans typically campaign on promises to slash government payrolls, which helps explain why recent GOP presidential candidates have received the smaller share of donations from government workers.
Yet while Republicans usually do worse than Democrats, Trump appears to be doing especially poorly in fundraising from government employees.
The 2012 GOP presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, received 14 percent of donations from the same group of agencies surveyed for Trump. Trump received just 5 percent.
Romney got close to $300,000 more from these same departments’ employees than Trump has four years later. Comparisons to previous presidential candidates are of limited value, since they took public funding for their general election campaigns.
Trump might have had a chance to do better than Romney. He discarded much of Republican orthodoxy during his primary campaign, which could have led some federal employees to believe that he’d be more amenable to big government. He vowed, for example, to leave massive social welfare programs virtually untouched.
But Trump also constantly attacked federal institutions. During his primary campaign, he described the federal government as a corrupt, bloated body run by “very, very, stupid people.”
Trump vowed “tremendous cutting” of the government in an interview with The Wall Street Journal in January and singled out the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency as agencies he’d slash dramatically if not outright eliminate.
Agency employees have likely taken note of Trump’s hostile rhetoric. In the Department of Education’s case, that included Trump’s pledges to hand over control to the states and to fight tooth and nail against Common Core standards.
From Department of Education employees this cycle, Trump received three donations totaling $220. Clinton received 724 donations for more than $74,000. In all, she received 99.7 percent of donations from employees of the department.
Donations from the State Department, which Clinton ran from 2009 to 2013, were even more slanted in her favor. State Department employees gave Trump 39 donations, for $4,652. Over the same time period, they gave their former boss 2,518 donations, for $425,525.
Throughout his campaign, Trump has portrayed himself as a strongman who would toughen up America’s defenses — both militarily and at the border — and who would take care of veterans. It’s probably no coincidence, therefore, that Trump performed best in donations among employees of three agencies: Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs.
But even employees of these more Trump-friendly agencies have overwhelmingly contributed to Clinton’s campaign. From Defense employees, Trump received 341 donations for $43,575. Clinton got 2,392 donations for $225,560, giving her 84 percent of the money. From Homeland Security employees, Clinton got 90 percent of the donations, and from Veterans Affairs she took 88 percent.
Romney performed significantly better than Trump with employees at all three agencies, receiving, for example, $98,153 from Defense employees, which amounted 21 percent of donations.
During the Republican primaries, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said, “Let’s create a little bit of a recession in Washington, D.C., so that we can have economic prosperity outside of Washington.” Fear of such plans might be the truest explanation of these uniformly lopsided donations.
Schultz, the Hamline professor, said “self-preservation”— particularly for workers engaged in public sector unions — probably motivates their political giving.
“This means support for their jobs,” he said. “Clinton, for the most part, is going to be probably a continuation of more or less what Obama is.”
Federal government employees, he said, are likely “more willing to give to somebody who would be more predictable in terms of supporting their livelihood, their jobs, as opposed to somebody who might be less predictable.”
Justice is delayed but it is coming WB. The indictments were real as well as Trump taking classified documents. He just ran out the clock. That won’t happen a second time.
Two of the cases were tossed completely out of court.
Of those prosecuted, Trump was prosecuted on made-up fake charges, charges so "novel" that NO ONE ELSE has EVER BEEN CHARGED with what Trump was tried for. Fake charges, judge-shopped ultra-partisan Democrat judges, partisan Democrat local county prosecutors, with illegal puppet-strings to Joe Biden and Merrick Garland's DOJ and FBI, illegally orchestrating the whole thing, with ultra-partisan over 90% Trump-hating juries in every case. . Jonathan Turley and Alan Dershowitz sat in these trials every day, and said they was the most disgustingly biased prosecutions they ever witnessed, in all their decades of trial law. And these are two guys who were lifelong Democrats. Both say that once these prosecutions reach the U S Supreme Court and get out of the ultra-Democrat partisan New York courts, the level of bias with which these trial were conducted will certainly get them overturned on appeal.
One more video of it, a little equal time for Trump and his supporters at the Youngsown, Ohio rally:
1) the liberal media ignores that the fat woman was there to disrupt the rally, and insult and rub it in the faces of everyone around her. And yet the media, kneejerk, attacks only Trump and his supporters. Ohh, terrible, totally unprovoked !
2) No one knows exactly what happened, you can't really see it clearly in the video, who threw the first punch. In the article quoted, the fat lady protester wasn't injured, and didn't press charges. And you can't prosecute someone when no one is pressing charges. The police who broke it up and escorted her out ALSO didn't witness who started it, who threw the first punch. So it's ultimately just more anti-Trump media narrative, omitting these facts.
I STILL haven't seen a clear start-to-finish video of the clash in its "raw" footage, as contrasted with the start-to-finish AI altered footage, the media just showing a few frames here and there. Nothing is clear, but M E M and the broader Left, and George Orwell's liberal media, are still ready to convict Trump and his supporters without a trial. As per usual.
Oh, and by the way, the oh-so-principled mayor of Youngstown, Ohio condemning "the senseless violence", is... a Democrat, in an overwhelmingly Democrat town, a "Democrat stronghold". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youngstown,_Ohio#Government_and_politics He's not principled and hoidy-toidy commenting from above it all, he's an opportunist attacking Trump and Trump supporters, to pander to his Democrat base.
And all this mention in the media about how she was wearing a "RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES" T-shirt. I guarantee you, neither Trump or any of the protesters clashing with her up close, even noticed what was written on her shirt, with all the thrashing movement and fighting, and her flipping middle fingers in everyone's faces. Yet the media focuses as if what was on her T-shirt is what incited people around her to punch her. Total B.S.
Yeah I saw that. My post was about what really happened. There have been other protesters that have been beaten up at Trump rallies.
Here's an ABC News clip from TEN YEARS AGO, showing the pattern that has persisted for TEN YEARS now:
1) Democrat-Bolsheviks think they have a right to disrupt and/or violently attack Trump and his supporters at rallies.
2) Republicans/Trump supporters mostly just contain and escort them out. But on occasion when attacked and angered, Trump supporters RARELY respond in kind. But then they do, Democrat-Bolsheviks in the media report on "violent Trump supporters" but with little or no mention of how they were provoked by violent Democrat agitators.
It's the same pattern as with Democrat-Leftists confronting ICE and Border Patrol. most of the time agitators are controlled perfectly, but 1 in 100 times, it goes badly, and then Democrat activists, and George Orwell's liberal media, use it as talking points to stoke their revolution and attack Trump and Republicans, and police.
No mention by the way, Trump in his remarks at the Youngstown Ohio rally over and over thought the fat female agitator was A GUY, at no point did he realize "goodbye, go home o mommy, another paid leftist disrupter..." comments that it was a woman. So from his distance onstage, Trump couldn't really tell what was going on, he thought the crowd was holding the agitator till police grabbed her and took her out. Likewise, the audience didn't each have a zoom camera to see what exactly was occurring at a distance from them, and so were just cheering that his person was stopped from disrupting the rally, and escorted out. Neither they (or Trump on stage) were cheering her being punched, they couldn't possibly see what precisely occurred.
And I love in several reports how liberal reporters condemn Trump for insulting her and her looks, but Trump all along thought it was a fat GUY, and never appeared at any point to realize it was a woman. Oh, OH ! So awful, they go on. Well, his was a person who was waving double middle fingers at everyone around her, people who waited a whole day to get in there and listen to Trump speak. That this unpleasant fat person disrupted and sabotaged. So I definitely think that warranted and justified every insult by Trump.
Justice is delayed but it is coming WB. The indictments were real as well as Trump taking classified documents. He just ran out the clock. That won’t happen a second time.
There’s video of the her being physically assaulted at the Trump rally WB so that is not fake news. It’s political violence that MAGA cheers on like they did on Jan 6. Again pretty stark contrast on how hecklers are treated and where political violence is tolerated. Other than wearing a release the Epstein files what else did she do? And Trump’s ice agent shot Renee in the head from the driver side of the window. Her tires were aimed to go around not at. Justice will have to wait for Renee and other ice victims but it will come once this rotten corrupt administration gets the boot.
That's a wild assumption, that "all" Trump supporters would support her being hit . I just support her being escorted out, like all the other Leftist disruptors, at every Trump rally. Not punching her. But if she was punched, why is there no prosecution of that? Like I said, she was escorted out by police. If the (I think) two people alleged to have punched her are later prosecuted for punching her, I have no problem with that. Only removing her from the aditorium was proportionate and necessary.
And I love how there is one incident, ONE, in over TEN YEARS OF TRUMP RALLIES where someone is allegedly punched, and you immediately jump to "This is what Trump supporters are about", and "All Trump supporters endorse this violence." ( Gee, it's funny, I don't recall you EVER condemning attacks on Trump supporters, in over 10 years. )
And as I just linked, there is an exaggerated fake AI video that portrays it as worse than it was.
Here's the video deconstructed, separating the real from the AI, from a far from pro-Trump media source:
You can imagine and pretend the orange fat corrupt slob was going to at some point unban the networks he shut out. The reality is he actually did what Obama never did. The Sandman story was an instance where the news updated the story as more information came in. This is different than Trump’s election lies where conservative networks ran with the conspiracy stuff and stuck with it even though they knew it was bs. The lies and conspiracies are popular with their large maga audiences.
No the Leftist news media deliberately ignored the facts, to portray Nicholas Sandmann and his friends as white-priveledge racist brats picking on a Native American man of color. And the news media spun i his way over and over WAY AFTER he media knew he rue facts. That is precisely why Sandmann has gained hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements from lying news source after lying news source. They KNEW they were lying, the whole ime, from he beginning, and the case each time is iron clad, to the point they HAVE to settle. .
Regarding Trump and his temporarily banning CNN and Poliico, I still say his own advisors behind the scenes no doubt told Trump early on that the press ban could not legally hold, and he is just dragging out this temporary ban to hurt those two lying news sources.
Musk authorized Starlink to be used for civilian purposes. Ukraine/Zelenskyy broke that agreement and used it for military purposes. Musk is not aiding Russia, he is enforcing the conditions he made in advance with Ukraine, when giving them his technology. Musk does not want to be part of the war, only to help the civilian people stuck in it.
I think Putin is an evil guy, who has caused mass destruction and civilian slaughter. And also caused the pointless death and maiming of hundreds of thousands of his own soldiers and civilians, in a pointless war. As I've said before, even if Putin were able (in the period he had the advantage) to conquer Ukraine, he would face years or decades of resistance at enormous cost, until eventually forced to give it up and withdraw.
And I don't think Ukraine should be forced to give up one acre of territory in negotiation with Russia. Ukraine now has the advantage, and is for the first time exacting a huge toll on the Russian military, and on the Russian economy. Possibly causing the collapse of Russia, or a least of the Putin regime.
I'd like to see a post-Putin regime that allies with Europe and the U.S., and Russia would benefit greatly from that economically. And Russia could pivot to an alliance with the West against China. This war is just an awful drain of lives and resources, that will inevitably be abandoned by Russia.
We can agree that Kash has no problem making political motivated allegations that you believe in. That’s why it was a bit of a shock that he personally debunked Trump’s and yours lie about the 247 plainclothes agents. Kash is getting sued btw by agents he fired. I look forward to seeing what his investigation consisted of that resulted in their terminations. My guess is it’s going to be a clear case of political retribution because they were assigned to investigate Trump’s theft and mishandling of classified documents.
We can agree that Kash Patel as FBI director has made remarkable achievements in arresting most wanted criminals, opening mass investigations of unquestionable mass fraud, arresting domestic criminals and criminal illegals, and protecting the American people from harm. The murder rate is currently the lowest it has been in 125 years !!! Record arrests, targeting the true sources of crime, violence, domestic terrorism and fraud.
Because Kash Patel's priorities are fighting crime and terrorism and arresting ACTUAL criminals and illegals, NOT devoting 40% of FBI's resources to fighting the fictional non-existent enemy of "domestic terrorism" by "white supremacists". Which was really just a way for a 97% Democrat-donating FBI to spy on, arrest and prosecute their conservative political opponents, by FALSELY LABELLING THEM as "domestic terrorists", to suppress and intimidate Democrats' political opposition. Likewise with the IRS destroying the Tea Party movement in 2010-2012, to rig the 2012 election for Barack Obama z(and probably still targeting conservatives).
I disagree with Patel on the minor points I've cited, in not disclosing the full extent of FBI conspiracy on Jan 6th. And I've speculated his reasons,
And no doubt, the Democrat-Bolsheviks still remaining in the FBI have out the long knives for Kash Patel. Patel fired 2,000 of FBI's 38,000 agents, and with the level of Democrat-Bolshevik infiltration of FBI, proven under Obama and Biden and even in Trump's first term to involve the entire management floor of the FBI, I have no doubt they will fight to keep the agency Democrat-weaponized. And the piece of shit agents who were fired no doubt have long chains of partisan texts along the lines of those found by Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Kevin Clinesmith, detailing their Democrat-Bolshevik malice toward the people they targeted, arrested, prosecuted, and extorted false confessions out of. ("Vive La Resistance", "Trump's not going become president, right? RIGHT?!?" "No. No he won't, we will stop it." )
Good luck challenging that. I would prefer prison time for these 2,000 fired, but at least they're out of the FBI. You portray rooting out corruption as "retribuion". Well fuck yes these agents deserved to be fired. And as I've said repeatedly, the level of cover up in FBI, undetected, manifests a vas majoriy of FBI agents participated in orchestrating o at leas enabling this abuse of power. For over 20 years in abusing their power against conservatives, against Catholics, against pro-life peaceful activists, against parents arrested for voicing objection to woke indoctrination at PTA meetings, with 6 AM FBI armed raids, FBI overcharging to force confessions. Spying on the entire Trump campaign and Trump administration. FBI raid on Mar A Lago. FBI orchestrating FOUR fake indictments of Trump, in the most rabidly pro-Democrat local districts in the U.S., with judge-shopped ultra-partisan Democrat judges, four rabid Democrat local prosecutors (led by he DOJ/FBI), and trials se up to be held in overwhelmingly Democrat jury venues, jurors licking their lips at the opportunity to convict Trump on ANY charge. Setting up Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Senator Ted Stevens, Scooter Libby, Michael Caputo, Roger Stone, and even maliciously prosecuting the innocent ones in Enron, and Arthur Anderson executives, and Martha Stewart. ALL this FBI abuse of power has to be punished, and the ones who abused that power be purged from the FBI, AT THE VERY LEAST.
That is not "retribution", that is justice. And 2,000 of these FBI agents fired is not nearly enough. And the ones still there are trying to destroy Kash Patel every day. And licking their lips at re-weaponizing the FBI, the instant a Democrat president is ever elected, and allows them to again do so. Fuck yes, fire them all.
So how is it that Musk can shut down services in Ukraine to aid Russia without Trump being ok with it? Need I say what happened was pure evil and the ones behind it besides Musk need to be tried and punished.
You can imagine and pretend the orange fat corrupt slob was going to at some point unban the networks he shut out. The reality is he actually did what Obama never did. The Sandman story was an instance where the news updated the story as more information came in. This is different than Trump’s election lies where conservative networks ran with the conspiracy stuff and stuck with it even though they knew it was bs. The lies and conspiracies are popular with their large maga audiences.
The court’s had to intervene on behalf of the press with Trump. They didn’t have to with Obama. And Trump resisted the courts on this. CNN is actually probably going to have to go back to the court again as they are still being barred! During the Biden administration there was an effort to get networks to be more factual instead of intentionally running news that they knew to be false. The 2020 election for example had some lawsuits by voting machine makers that revealed that conservative networks knew a lot of Trump’s claims were lies but ran with them to please their conservative audiences. And the networks paid big sums to settle.
None of that changes the fact that Trump did not permanently ban CNN or Poliico, or that Trump never intended to, just that he pushed it to the courts to make it as difficult as possible for CNN and Politico. Again, to emphasize in the media for a prolonged period that those two news organizations are low both in journalistic integrity, and in ratings.
I never saw ANY evidence that Fox, Newsmax or OAN were false in their reporting. Every network makes occasional errors in fac and publicly makes retractions. That said, the only incident where I think that is even in question for Fox, OAN and Newsmax, is reporting on the 2020 rigged election for Joe Biden, in specifically naming Dominion voting systems as the way the election was rigged. I think it definitely WAS a rigged election, but anchors at Fox, Newsmax, OAN and their guests such as Sydney Powell made statements as facts that were not absolutely proven. The election ABSOLUTELY WAS rigged, but it could not BE PROVEN to be rigged. And so those networks were sued. But in many other ways, as I've detailed, there is proof that the 2020 Biden election was rigged, in particular Elon Musk's released Twitter files, and the conspiracy by FBI, CIA and social media giants like Facebook and Twitter to suppress and censor reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop using the bogus label of "Russian disinformation", to win the 2020 election. Plus millions of fake mail-in ballots, and U S Postal employees who tesified to a truckload of fake ballots, and USPS managers who ordered employees to turn in expire ballots, so they could be manually be backdated by managers and illegally counted in the election. Among many other forms of mass cheating.
Many legal experts have said that Fox News could have won the Dominion lawsuit case, it they had pushed it to the wall and fought it all he way o the end. But that Fox settled, so Dominion's lawyers could not obtain internal communications from Fox in discovery documents. They were willing to settle for $900 million with Dominion, rather than reveal their internal communications. And as Fox News was worth $20 billion at the time, $900 million was less than 5% of Fox's total assets.
Like Dominion, under-age student Nicholas Sandmann sued for statements made about him by multiple major networks, that were absolutely untrue. Yet you still regard those lying liberal media networks as respectable journalists, while regarding Fox, OAN and Newsmax as forever tainted and disreputable, when they chose to settle with Dominion, despite a lot more supporting facts on their side to back what they reported.
The court’s had to intervene on behalf of the press with Trump. They didn’t have to with Obama. And Trump resisted the courts on this. CNN is actually probably going to have to go back to the court again as they are still being barred! During the Biden administration there was an effort to get networks to be more factual instead of intentionally running news that they knew to be false. The 2020 election for example had some lawsuits by voting machine makers that revealed that conservative networks knew a lot of Trump’s claims were lies but ran with them to please their conservative audiences. And the networks paid big sums to settle.
We can agree that Kash has no problem making political motivated allegations that you believe in. That’s why it was a bit of a shock that he personally debunked Trump’s and yours lie about the 247 plainclothes agents. Kash is getting sued btw by agents he fired. I look forward to seeing what his investigation consisted of that resulted in their terminations. My guess is it’s going to be a clear case of political retribution because they were assigned to investigate Trump’s theft and mishandling of classified documents.
There’s video of the her being physically assaulted at the Trump rally WB so that is not fake news. It’s political violence that MAGA cheers on like they did on Jan 6. Again pretty stark contrast on how hecklers are treated and where political violence is tolerated. Other than wearing a release the Epstein files what else did she do? And Trump’s ice agent shot Renee in the head from the driver side of the window. Her tires were aimed to go around not at. Justice will have to wait for Renee and other ice victims but it will come once this rotten corrupt administration gets the boot.
![[Linked Image from milehighcomics.com]](http://www.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/24427252592.455.jpg)
