Thread Like Summary
iggy, Matter-eater Man, MisterJLA
Total Likes: 8
Original Post (Thread Starter)
by MisterJLA
MisterJLA
https://apnews.com/article/trump-dividend-5k-5000-check-republicans-cc80644e3168acd31c892129fb849436

Let's play the "If Obama or Biden did the same thing" game! The MAGA and FUX News hypocrites would be shitting themselves in outrage.

When "their guy" does it...uh, that's different.
Liked Replies
by iggy
iggy
Originally Posted by Lothar of The Hill People
Last month dems hated fresh water! Now they hate money!

You guys don't have to keep the money. You could give your money to some charity you support. You could give it to ANTIFA or an abortion clinic. You could even give your money to your terrorist buddies in Iran. This could be a good thing for those you support.

So what did you spend your DOGE check on, Lotard?
2 members like this
by Matter-eater Man
Matter-eater Man
It’s cute that at this point you believe Trump on this. Or like Melanie are you just going through the motions? (Albeit without getting paid)
1 member likes this
by MisterJLA
MisterJLA
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
I don’t see how it doesn’t add to the already immense debt that Trump has racked up already.

Mexico is paying for the big, beautiful wall.
1 member likes this
by Matter-eater Man
Matter-eater Man
Key Facts About the $5,000 Proposal
• The Condition: President Donald Trump stated the $5,000 checks will only be distributed to adult U.S. citizens if Republicans retain control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate in the November midterm elections.
• What It's Called vs. What It Is: While the administration has framed the payout as a "dividend" or compared it to past tariff concepts, it does not stem from an actual tax overpayment or formal statutory tax rebate.
• Cost and Scale: Reaching roughly 240 to 260 million adult Americans would cost approximately $1.2 to $1.3 trillion—exceeding standard U.S. tariff revenues and requiring congressional approval.
• Funding Uncertainty: Administration officials like Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have claimed the funds wouldn't rely on standard taxpayer dollars or increase the deficit, while independent fiscal analysts and economists warn that new global tariffs or unbacked revenue projections cannot realistically cover a $1+ trillion payout without spiking inflation or the national debt.
• Political Attribution: The proposal has drawn mixed reactions—praised by supporters as a direct economic boost, questioned by some Republican lawmakers over fiscal caution, and criticized by Democrats and watchdogs as an unfeasible campaign tactic or election-related promise.

I don’t see how it doesn’t add to the already immense debt that Trump has racked up already.
1 member likes this
by Captain Sammitch
Captain Sammitch
Fascists and reactionaries get off on what the rest of us would easily recognize as "hypocrisy." They believe rules exist to be wielded against their "enemies," and "breaking" them in front of everyone else is one of their favorite flexes.

oh shit sorry rackjla damn almost forgot
1 member likes this
by Matter-eater Man
Matter-eater Man
Obama did work with republicans “deficit hawks “ That happened. Democrat controlled congress enacted pay as you go that republicans jettisoned when they took control. That’s just historical fact easily checked WB.
1 member likes this
by Matter-eater Man
Matter-eater Man
And you make as usual many accusations while your guy is doing exactly what you accuse. It’s ridiculous. The agencies that are supposed to be operating independently are just political arms for Trump. Going after for someone for taking a picture of sea shells for example.
1 member likes this
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0