Disloyalty to big (orange) brother will not be tolerated! Putting country above that pos guarantees death threats and getting ran out of the party for republicans.
I think that's clear enough. She's the daughter of former V P Dick Cheney, that is the definition of an establishment neo-con elitist Republican. As opposed to a nationist/populist like Trump, and the movement he leads.
And the establishment Democrats, the establishment Republicans, the globalists (that also includes the Soros-funded BLM and Antifa Left and the Bernie Sanders wing marxist revolutionaries), and their Democrat/deep state allies in the FBI, DOJ, State Department, CIA, and every other tentacle of the establishment/deep state beast. Which also includes many judges, up to and including, as we've seen over the last two months, the U.S. Supreme Court. So, more succinctly, fuck yes it's a conspiracy.
And a conspiracy by a group of violent radicals, agents of a Democrat party who have already infiltrated Trump rallies in 2016 to start violence and then blame it on Trump, but were proven (by Project Veritas, ON VIDEO) to be thug agents of the Hillary Clinton campaign, who openly boasted they were paid through "a double wall of deniability".
Also:
Text by LISA PAGE: "Trump's not going to be president, right? RIGHT?!?" Text by PETER STRZOK: "No. No, he won't. We will stop it."
Yeah, a false flag conspiracy against Trump and his supporters couldn't possibly happen...
"Vote how you want, but deviating from the party is bad and we will punish you for it" is a pretty shitty position and you would shit all over it if it were spoken like that by Democrats. Clearly, yes, you are a fucking moron who slogged through OBAMANOMICS and some Pat Buchanan shit, realized reading was fucking hard, and never touched another book again...much less a book like 1984. You are fucking loon.
"Vote how you want, but deviating from the party is bad and we will punish you for it" is a pretty shitty position and you would shit all over it if it were spoken like that by Democrats. Clearly, yes, you are a fucking moron who slogged through OBAMANOMICS and some Pat Buchanan shit, realized reading was fucking hard, and never touched another book again...much less a book like 1984. You are fucking loon.
Quoted to preserve your own self-incriminating stupidity.
You claim to be a junior college professor, and yet this appears to be the best you can do in trying to articulate your thoughts.
Moron.
We're the Republican party, but we're going to have leadership under Liz Cheney that enacts policy directly opposite the will of 97% of the Republican voters who support Trump? Who has far grreater support than even Ronald Reagan, and certainly far more than Liz Cheney? The whole point of having a Republican party is to rally around leaders like Reagan and Trump, who most popularly represent the will of Republican voters. The purpose of a party is to represent the priorities of a maajority of its members and especially its voters. Liz Cheney is trying to hijack the will of those voters, just to elevate her own position and power.
And we should instead support leaders who help the Democrats impeach Trump OVER NOTHING, over a false narrative that is already crumbling not even a day after Liz Ceney, Pelosi and the Democrats used that false narrative to impeach Trump a second time over nothing? The timeline is falling apart, it doesn't fit the impeachment narrative that Trump "incited" the protesters. NYPD, FBI and DHS information now shows it was all pre-planned, a month in advance. And it is no longer a "conspiracy theory" that Antifa was involved, but proven to the point that FBI has arrested the ringleader, or at least one of several, and plenty of video of him boasting about infiltrating, planning the violence, doing the violence himself, and inciting others as well to commit violence and damage.
There are some less bright fringe idiots arrested from among actual Trump supporters as well, arrested on lesser charges like criminal trespass and theft of property. But my belief that the ones at the center of the violence has so far been borne out in the FBI's investigation and arrests, and Antifa's own videos from that day.
Explaining the 12th Amendment options that Vice President Pence had on Jan 6th, as quoted from a former assistant Attorney General John Yoo, and by a former Homeland Security Council deputy counsel Robert Delahunty....
Quote
In October, writing for The American Mind, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law Professor (and former Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General [under George W. Bush]) John Yoo, as well as University of St. Thomas School of Law Professor (and former Deputy General Counsel of the United States Homeland Security Council [also under Dubya]) Robert Delahunty, related something of keen interest:
Under the 12th Amendment, “the President of the Senate [i.e., the Vice President] shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates [of the electoral votes of the states] and the votes shall then be counted.” Left unclear is who is to “count” the electors’ votes and how their validity is to be determined.
Over the decades, political figures and legal scholars have offered different answers to these constitutional questions. We suggest that the Vice President’s role is not the merely ministerial one of opening the ballots and then handing them over (to whom?) to be counted. Though the 12th Amendment describes the counting in the passive voice, the language seems to envisage a single, continuous process in which the Vice President both opens and counts the votes.
The check on error or fraud in the count is that the Vice President’s activities are to be done publicly, “in the presence” of Congress. And if “counting” the electors’ votes is the Vice President’s responsibility, then the inextricably intertwined responsibility for judging the validity of those votes must also be his.
Their article, titled What Happens if No One Wins?, and subtitled, “(t)he Constitution provides for election crises—and its provisions favor Trump,” is essential reading for a time like this, as well as the future, in my humble, non-barrister’s opinion.
Will Pence take advantage of his power under the 12th Amendment? Who is to say he cannot claim that vast fraud and irregularities took place, using Peter Navarro’s 36-page report, The Immaculate Deception, as reason for discarding the official Dem electors? After all, Navarro is hardly some schnook who just fell off the turnip wagon; he simultaneously serves as the Assistant to the President and the Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy.
Of course, the Electoral Count Act, which specifies how Congress tallies electoral votes, should at least be brought up here, but the Act itself may be unconstitutional, as Yoo and Delahunty argue: “Congress cannot use legislation to dictate how any individual branch of government is to perform its unique duties: Congress could not prescribe how future Senates should conduct an impeachment trial, for example.”
It would be near-impossible to seriously maintain, then, that Pence is violating the law simply because he is following the plain language of the Constitution itself. Needless to mention, a great deal would do exactly that, which, at the very least, would make for some choice free entertainment.
...argues that Pence absolutely did have the authority to decide the election, or at the very least allow nationally televised debate of the evidence of election fraud. There were multiple paths to an V P or legislative overturn of the fraudulent election. Pence for whatever reason abdicated those options, that would have made him a hero to the over 50% of the country who can plainly see the Biden coup, under the guise of being a free and fair election, was illegitimate. Justice and legality would be not allowing it to stand.
Pence will forever be remembered as the VP who sold us all out, particularly in the face of an incredibly corrupt Biden administration, whose corruption and incompetence the nation might not survive.
He never broke 50% while he was President. Sort of hard to do when you’re pleasing the camp auschwitz crowd I would imagine.
Assuming the "camp Auschwitz"-shirt guy is not an Antifa guy PRETENDING to be a Trump supporter to smear them at the rally, as many others like Jon Sullivan were. And it was Sullivan who deliberately caused the violence, not Trump. As Trump's 1 hour and 11 minute speech proves (which is why leftist big tech social media and the liberal media are trying so hard to ban it, so people caan't see the truth, that Trump did nothing wrong). Just as the videos Jon Sullivan and his BLM group posted on social media self-incriminatingly prove that his leftist group were the ones truly responsible for the violence.
Sorry that these FACTS interfere with your lying narrative.
He never broke 50% while he was President. Sort of hard to do when you’re pleasing the camp auschwitz crowd I would imagine.
Assuming the "camp Auschwitz"-shirt guy is not an Antifa guy PRETENDING to be a Trump supporter to smear them at the rally, as many others like Jon Sullivan were. And it was Sullivan who deliberately caused the violence, not Trump. As Trump's 1 hour and 11 minute speech proves (which is why leftist big tech social media and the liberal media are trying so hard to ban it, so people caan't see the truth, that Trump did nothing wrong). Just as the videos Jon Sullivan and his BLM group posted on social media self-incriminatingly prove that his leftist group were the ones truly responsible for the violence.
Sorry that these FACTS interfere with your lying narrative.
He never broke 50% while he was President. Sort of hard to do when you’re pleasing the camp auschwitz crowd I would imagine.
Assuming the "camp Auschwitz"-shirt guy is not an Antifa guy PRETENDING to be a Trump supporter to smear them at the rally, as many others like Jon Sullivan were. And it was Sullivan who deliberately caused the violence, not Trump. As Trump's 1 hour and 11 minute speech proves (which is why leftist big tech social media and the liberal media are trying so hard to ban it, so people caan't see the truth, that Trump did nothing wrong). Just as the videos Jon Sullivan and his BLM group posted on social media self-incriminatingly prove that his leftist group were the ones truly responsible for the violence.
Sorry that these FACTS interfere with your lying narrative.
And the graph shows that during Trump's 4 years, Trump on many days polled higher than Obama at the same point in his presidency.
Keep pounding that delusional sand, you terrorist sympathizer!
I don't see any facts to prove my alleged delusion, just your usual petty insults.
Even if this "camp Aushwitz" guy turns out to be an actual Trump supporter, he's one lone nut, and not representative of the Trump movement, or a participant in any violence. Also: 1) Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner is Jewish 2) his daughter Ivanka, Kushner's wife, converted to Judaism 3) Trump's grandchildren are Jewish 4) Trump, after 30 years of promises to do so by 5 previous presidents, is the president who finally fulfilled the promise to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. 5) Trump is otherwise the most pro-Israel president ever. 6) Trump negotiated a middle east peace deal that has secured the safety of millions of Jews in Israel 7) Democrats are the party of antisemitism, as exemplified by Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Barack Obama and Keith Ellison's ties to rabid antisemite Louis Farrakhan. And the entire party removing a pro-Israel policy from their platform. And for that matter, removed the God of Israel from their platform.
....Oh wait. No it isn't. Trump is drawing tremendously huge crowds every where he goes--even places he hasn't gone (see also: Beverly Hills)--and, predictably, the polls have once again gone from YUGELY favoring Democrats to evening out with, or leaning toward, Trump.
Trump will win in a landslide both in the popular vote and the electoral college. Any other reported result will, and should, be challenged.
I'm hearings murmuring about watermarks. Very sophisticated and impossible to duplicate watermarks that are on ballots the ballots....hmmmmm....this will get VERY interesting if true.
President Donald Trump publicly lashed out at Gov. Doug Ducey on Monday, contending the Republican leader and Trump supporter "betrayed the people of Arizona" by certifying an election that didn't go the president's way.
As Ducey signed the certification documents Monday, his cellphone buzzed with the ringtone of "Hail to the Chief." Ducey said he set that for calls coming from the White House. Monday, he muted the ring tone and set the phone aside, continuing to sign documents that made Trump's loss official.
Link - Breitbart: Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.
Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:
Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
…
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.
Tim Pool phrased it adequately. Texas has just NUKED the Democrats from Orbit. This suit meets ALL the qualifications:
1) It goes direct to the Supreme Court on account of a dispute between multiple states.
2) It was filed mere HOURS before safe harbor day, which puts all of the defendant states in dispute and de-solidifies electors.
3) Because this is a dispute between the states addressing the constitutionality--or lack thereof--of the past election, that means that Trump is not actually engaging in Lawfare since the Constitution supercedes the law.
Link - WT: GOP electors cast votes for Trump in Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania
Republican electors in Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania cast votes for President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence on Monday in hopes a court might overturn Joseph R. Biden’s win, even as the Electoral College voted across the nation to certify the Democrat’s victory.
Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer said Republican electors met at the state capitol to cast votes for Mr. Trump because a Trump campaign lawsuit challenging the state’s election is still pending.
“Had we not meet today and cast our votes, the President’s pending election contest would have been effectively mooted. Our action today preserves his rights under Georgia law,” Mr. Shafer tweeted.
The Pennsylvania GOP said the Trump campaign asked Republican electors to vote for Mr. Trump to preserve the right to another legal challenge that could overturn Mr. Biden’s win.
“We took this procedural vote to preserve any legal claims that may be presented going forward,” Trump campaign Pennsylvania chair Bernie Comfort said in a statement. “This was in no way an effort to usurp or contest the will of the Pennsylvania voters.”
Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward said Republican electors also met Monday to vote for Mr. Trump. She said legal challenges to the election are still being heard.
“It is imperative that the proper electors are counted by Congress,” she said.
The actions keep open the option of sending pro-Trump slates of electors to Congress, which will vote on Jan. 6 on whether to accept each state’s electoral votes. Congress can only approve one slate of electors from each state, either for Mr. Biden or for Mr. Trump.
Apparently, WI and MI GOP Electors voted as well, but I'm still trying to confirm that.
They say that this is for a provisional declaration on the 6th. But I don't think this is going to be fully determined til the 20th. Just a hunch.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry gushed over President Joe Biden’s inauguration on Thursday, although its river of praise read more like a backhanded parting shot at the departing Trump administration than any deep appreciation for the new one.
As Reuters pointed out, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying made a point of including a new propaganda phrase adapted by the Chinese Communist Party from a line in Biden’s inaugural speech and repeated by Chinese state media: “I believe if both countries put in the effort, the kind angels can triumph over evil forces.” The line is a play on Biden saying, “Through struggle, sacrifice, and setbacks, our better angels have always prevailed.” Biden was, in turn, quoting Abraham Lincoln’s inaugural address.
“In the past years, the Trump administration, especially Pompeo, has laid too many mines that need to be removed, burned too many bridges that need to be rebuilt, damaged too many roads that need to be repaired,” Hua said on Thursday, referring to former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. “President Biden also mentioned in his inauguration speech that Americans have much to heal, much to restore. This is exactly what China-U.S. relations need,” she said.
Apparently, that need for healing and restoration is not urgent enough for China to drop the petty-revenge sanctions it imposed on departing Trump officials during the Biden inauguration ceremony. Even the Biden team thought those sanctions were a bit much, denouncing them as “unproductive and cynical,” but Hua insisted they were appropriate and would remain in force. “China’s decision to impose sanctions on these U.S. individuals is a legitimate and necessary response to their erroneous behaviors that severely violated China’s sovereignty, security and development interests on China-related issues. It fully demonstrates the Chinese government’s determination to safeguard national interests,” she said. “I must stress that in the past few years, out of selfish political agenda and bias and hatred against China, some anti-China politicians in the United States planned, worked on and made a lot of crazy moves that severely interfered in China’s internal affairs, undermined China’s interests, hurt the Chinese people’s sentiments, and damaged China-U.S. relations. China has pointed out multiple times that these anti-China politicians will pay for their crazy acts,” she added.
Those "selfish" and " erroneous behaviors" were, y'know, eliminating annual trade deficits of over 500 billion a year to something resembling proportionate and equal mutual trade, putting pressure on China to stop its cyber-theft estimated at about 600 billion a year, targeting every U.S. large company and every federal branch of government hit by Chinese cyber-hacking,. AndChinese aggression toward its neighbors in and around the South China sea. And its attempted crushing human rights violations in Hong Kong, and increasingly telegraphing they plan to do the same to Taiwan. And imprisonment, slave labor, forced sterilization, torture and genocide of Uyghurs in Xinxiang province, estimated to be about 1 to 3 million incarcerated. And the same treatment of those in occupied Tibet.
You know. "selfish" stuff like that. Stuff Biden will roll over and play dead over, and allow the Chinese to run wild.
The Chinese were holding out to see if #JoeChina, China's inside man, could get elected, and they were successful. Trump never avoided the subject, he plainly said that if he was elected to a second term (and he was, and electoral fraud cheated him of that second term) that China could not hold out another 4 years, and would within weeks of his re-election be forced to sign a deal with Trump. Same with Iran. Same with North Korea.
But because Biden was able to rig the vote and do a soft coup, all these nations are laughing at us and slapping each other high-fives. Likewise Al Qaida. Likewise the Mexican drug cartels (that also make a third of their profits trafficking illegals into the U.S.). Likewise ISIS. Likewise Russia.
Not even a week into Biden's presidency, he is destroying this country from within. Biden scrapped the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, that instantly terminated 11,000 jobs and threatens U.S. oil independence, and will kill another 700,000 jobs over the next 10 years. Biden is allowing Chinese components into the U.S. electrical grid, that can be cyber-hacked and be used in a war to destroy us. Biden wants to re-enter the Iran nuclear deal, that will ASSURE Iran gets nuclear weapons within just a few years. And they have ICBM's now that will allow them to target the U.S. and any other part of the world. AND WILL SET OFF A NUCLEAR ARMS RACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST. Biden re-entered the U.S. into the Paris Accord that Trump took us out of, that will further cripple U.S. industry, despite that WITHOUT that agreement, the U.S. has till now had lover emissions than any other nation on earth. And despite that while crippling COMPLIANT U.S. industry, the Paris Accord puts not requirements of compliance on China, India, Iran, North Korea or the other greatest polluters on earth. All it does is damage the U.S.
On every level, Biden is signing policy that will hurt the country, cause skyrocketing prices of fuel and goods, and eliminate millions of jobs. I seriously hope we can survive 4 years of Obama, before the Democratss can do permanent damage. He is acting as if he were elected and had a mandate, but he was NOT elected. And Democrats won't allow the evidence to be looked at, because they know that's the case. It is quantifiably proven by every measure that Trump is the most effective president in over 50 years, and has overseen the highest rise in incomes in every demographic: blacks, hispanics, women, asians, people under 25, and whites. The lowest unemployment in over 50 years. The first rise in real incomes in 50 years, ESPECIALLY benefitting the middle class and poor. A big part of that was reigning in illegal immigration, so that an uncontrolled swarm of illegal immigrants stopped driving down wages. Guess what Biden immediately destroyed? BORDER SECURITY.
It's an absolute fact that Joe Biden is a self-confessed prostitute for lobby cash who will sell himself to whoever greases him with corrupt financial compensation for the betrayal. Both Biden's sons sat on the boards of the largest corporations in his state, that greased him with huge campaign contributions, and were rewarded with huge legislative favors from Biden, that paid off for them in the billions. Biden is China's guy, and the New York Post broke that story a month before the election. Peter Schweizer and Gregg Jarrett exposed that corruption closer to 4 years ago in their books. Michelle Malkin exposed Biden's 50 years of corruption in her 2010 book CULTURE OF CORRUPTION. It's beyond denial. All the Orwellian mainstream media and social media do is suppress this information about Biden's undeniable corruption, but they cannot hide it. THAT's your "turd", M E M.
President Joe Biden campaigned on a message of unifying a deeply fractured nation, reiterating the theme frequently during his inauguration speech earlier this month. According to a recent poll, however, the new administration has thus far attracted the approval of less than half of the country.
In fact, Rasmussen found that outgoing President Donald Trump had a higher approval rate before leaving office than Biden did a week into his term.
Despite puff pieces and general approval from the mainstream media in regard to his nascent presidency, following years of widespread vilification of the Trump administration, the Democratic Party’s promise of unity has not come to fruition. The polling firm’s daily presidential tracking poll found Biden’s approval and disapproval ratings were tied at 48% each.
Breaking the results down further, 34% said they “strongly approved” of Biden’s performance, compared to 41% who “strongly disapproved. The supposedly divisive Trump administration ended on decidedly better terms, according to the poll. Upon leaving office, Trump had an approval rating of 51% — three points higher than his disapproval rating.
Of course, Rasmussen polling results are frequently outliers compared to other major firms, and the early Biden approval numbers are no exception.
The RealClearPolitics average of polls, which includes Rasmussen, finds that Biden has the approval of nearly 55% of the nation and just 37% disapprove. Reiterating the disparity between polls, the same average as reported at the end of Trump’s term found his rating was underwater by 15 points with just 41% overall approval.
In a separate survey question, Rasmussen reported that of 1,000 likely voters polled between Jan. 25-26, only 16% believed the country was more unified than before the election. About one in four felt the level of division between Americans was roughly the same.
Perhaps most telling, a whopping 56% believe the nation’s sharp divisions have only grown deeper since Biden’s inauguration. Nevertheless, some experts believe Biden’s inaugural “honeymoon” period is likely to be short-lived.
As Fordham University political scientist Jeffrey Cohen explained: “One of the things that’s happened is that old-fashioned ‘let’s give the guy a chance’ has kind of evaporated. Instead, people don’t break out of their voting patterns. The divisiveness that you see in election campaigns stays.”
And as I've pointed out often, that's with the media acting as Biden's protector and propping him up every day, and that same media hyperpartisanly attacking Trump and kicking him down every day. And yet, even with all that, Trump holds this level of popularity. With poll evidence, more popular than Biden, despite the Orwellian Newspeak media.
Far from striving for unity and any outreach to the 74.3 million Trump voters he cheated on election day (and won't even allow investigation of the ballots to assure them it was a fair election), Biden has turned Washington DC into an armed camp, has called anyone who disagrees with him "domestic terrorists" who need to be spied on by federal agencies, has overseen calls to de-platform conservatives who even criticize him from Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Amazon and other social media, and further calls to take Fox News, OAN and Newsmax off the air "de-platforming" them from cable television subscribers. And even had the likes of Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi accuse Republican House and Senate members as "enemies within our own ranks."
These same Democrats that accuse Republicans of "inciting", are the same Democrats that cheer on Antifa and BLM burning hundreds of cities nationwide, the same Democrats who cheer on attacks on federal buildings and ICE compounds EVERY DAY, and never acknowledge that their own rhetoric DIRECTLY incites and encourages these attacks. Even as they try to manufacture allegations that Trump incited riots at the Capitol on January 6th. DESPITE that the NYPD, FBI and DHS were made aware these Jan 6th attacks were planned long before Trump ever gave his speech that day. Despite that the attacks that day moved into position BEFORE Trump began his speech. Despite that there are no words in Trump's 71-minute speech that incited violence. If it were there, the Democrats and liberal media would be quoting it endlessly. They're not.
The Democrats at every turn are the ones inciting division and political violence. Biden, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer, Maxine Waters, Cory Booker, Ocasio-Cortez, pretty much every Democrat.
And then Biden has the audacity to pass an unprecedented 40 executive orders in his first 8 days, ramming his Bolshevik nation-destroying agenda down the nation's throats, as if this fraudulent unelected clod had some kind of mandate to do so.
Even Tulsi Gabbard has made a public statement about how dangerous what Team Biden, Pelosi and Schumer are doing.
Even the New York Times published an editorial saying okay, enough with the executive orders already, that he should time to try to actually lead and build coalitions, not deliver unpopular executive orders like a tyrant king.
Is it any wonder that in less than 2 weeks, in ACTUAL polls and not gushing liberal media puff pieces, Biden has already dropped below 50% in not even his first 2 weeks? Democrats are proving their tyranny and abuse of power, and corruption every day.
Biden’s 54 percent approval is based on polls. I guess media puff pieces equates to polls where you don’t like the results. As for executive orders I’m good with Biden’s fast action to remove at least some of the trump stain. I’m sure his second term will have far fewer executive orders.
Biden’s 54 percent approval is based on polls. I guess media puff pieces equates to polls where you don’t like the results. As for executive orders I’m good with Biden’s fast action to remove at least some of the trump stain. I’m sure his second term will have far fewer executive orders.
I already said, Gallup and Rasmussen are among the best known polls in the U.S., and Rasmussen has been the single most accurate in calling multiple elections since 2000. As compared with the bulk of liberal media polls that have been wildly inaccurate. But as my article above cites, the other polls are taken into account in the RealClearPolitics average of polls, despite their skewed liberal bias.
In fact, Trump was a historically unpopular president. According to Gallup, which started tracking presidential performance in 1938, Trump had an average approval rating of 41 percent during his time in the White House—lower than any other commander-in-chief in modern history.
CNN is reporting that the case to prove Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick’s death was murder may be falling apart.
Investigators are struggling to build a federal murder case regarding fallen US Capitol Police officer, Brian Sicknick, vexed by a lack of evidence that could prove someone caused his death as he defended the Capitol during last month’s insurrection.
Authorities have reviewed video and photographs that show Sicknick engaging with rioters amid the siege but have yet to identify a moment in which he suffered his fatal injuries, law enforcement officials familiar with the matter said.
Soon after Sicknick died on January 7, prosecutors in Washington opened a federal murder investigation, dedicating a team inside the US attorney’s office to build out a case, authorities have said.
This is a far cry from what we were told—that the officer was beaten to death. Not only can authorities not explain his death, but they also admit to having given out false information that the officer was bludgeoned by a fire extinguisher.
According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true.
How can we know so little about the cause of this man’s death almost an entire month later?
To date, little information has been shared publicly about the circumstances of the death of the 13-year veteran of the police force, including any findings from an autopsy that was conducted by DC’s medical examiner. In a statement the day after the insurrection, Capitol Police said that Sicknick had been “injured while physically engaging with protesters” and collapsed as a result of his injuries sometime after returning to his office. He died the next day in a local hospital
.
We don’t know if he had any health conditions that contributed to the death. We don’t know the cause of death. Basically, we know nothing about how or why this man died, but his death was used to paint all of the protesters at the Capitol as violent insurrectionists. There’s no question that some of them did act violently, but if they did not commit murder, we should know that, too.
The FBI says that 100 officers were injured in the Capitol events. I hope that didn’t happen, honestly, because it is upsetting to think about people who agree with me politically participating in violence like that. If they did, they should be locked up. But I don’t know how anyone can know anything definitively at this point after learning that reports about Sicknick were not correct. What else about this reporting was wrong? Will we ever know?
In court documents, FBI agents have laid out elements of the attacks faced by officers in alarming detail. More than 100 police officers were injured in the melee, including at least 15 officers who required hospitalization, according to court documents.
Even though the network is reporting the major questions surrounding the officer’s death, CNN contributors are still claiming that Sicknick was killed “in the January 6th terrorist attack,” though he died a day later and authorities don’t know how or why. Does that seem like good journalism to you? It’s clear that no matter what comes from this investigation, Officer Sicknick will be forever used to push the left’s narrative that a protest in which a tiny percentage of the attendees got out of control was a “violent terrorist attack” and an “insurrection.” Whether that is actually true doesn’t seem to matter. How do you like living in a post-truth reality?
Officer Sicknick is lying in honor in the Capitol.
My condolences to the Sicknick family. However he died—and maybe we’ll find out one day— it’s a sad loss. Rest in peace.
So a further piece of the Democrat lying narrative (and rationalization for a national lockdown on 74 million "white supremacist" Trump supporters) is falling apart.
Further, officer Brian Sicknick was a Trump supporter, who wrote multiple letters to House and Senate leaders about his outrage that Trump was being impeached in 2020, and appealing to them to stop the unwarranted impeachment procedure.
Again, I suspect that if Sicknick had been killed and it was an ACTUAL Trump supporter, that person would have been arrested a long time ago. Plenty of video and photos of the protest crowds and Sicknick clashing with them, plenty of people they could identify and pull in to interrogate to find out who any unknown person was inside the Capitol. I think the 97% Democrat-donating FBI doesn't want to bring them in, because it doesn't fit their Bolshevik party's narrative.
Investigators have recommended that prosecutors decline to bring charges against a US Capitol Police officer in the shooting of a pro-Trump rioter who was killed during the insurrection, according to people familiar with the matter.
The shooting of pro-Trump rioter, Ashli Babbitt, remains under investigation by the DC Metropolitan Police, the US Attorney’s Office in Washington, DC, and civil rights prosecutors, a routine process for shootings involving the Capitol Police. A final decision hasn’t been made, the people familiar with the probe told CNN. Justice Department officials could make a final decision in the coming days.
CNN has reached out to Metropolitan Police and the US Attorney’s Office in DC for comment. The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the recommendation.
Babbitt was fatally shot as the mob tried to force its way toward the House Chamber where members of Congress were sheltering, US Capitol Police said in a statement. She was given medical assistance immediately and taken to a hospital, where she was pronounced dead.
Babbitt was an ardent Trump supporter who held strong political views, her mother previously told CNN, and was “passionate enough to die for what she believed in.”
Babbitt, who was previously married but separated from her husband in 2019, frequently attended pro-Trump rallies. She flew to Washington, DC, from San Diego, California, with the intent to participate in the protest, her mother said. A CNN review of Babbitt’s social media accounts determined Babbitt frequently voiced support for Trump and other Republican figures on Facebook. She also shared content promoting political conspiracy theories often pushed by far-right figures.
Babbitt served as a senior airman in the US Air Force from 2004 to 2008 under the name Ashli Elizabeth McEntee, according to military records. She was a member of the Air Force Reserve from 2008 to 2010 and was in the Air National Guard from 2010 until November 2016, records show.
Piece-of-shit CNN fails to mention that Babbitt was UNARMED when she was shot from several yards away, climbing through a window, by the officer. Remember when an identified violent repeat felon piece of garbage was shot (not killed) by police in Kenosha, Wisconsin when the thug reached for a knife in his SUV? And there were riots and half a city burned because of alleged excessive force? "Black Lives Matter" they scream in an orchestrated event, despite on a perfectly legitimate police shooting.
But when Ashli Babbitt, a decorated 35 year old military veteran, UNARMED, is shot dead? Nothing to see here, no further investigation, no charges, move on. Does Ashli Babbitt's life matter? Apparently not so much.
And I would point out that BLM leader John Earle Sullivan orchestrated the panic on the police side of that Jan 6th incident. And yet he is home, under only house arrest and still stoking violence on Facebook and Twitter, who apparently have no problem with him directly causing Babbitt's death, and further using their social media platforms to promote violence. He probably will see his case dropped by the 97% Democrat-campaign-donating DOJ/FBI as well.
You understand what Babbit was doing beyond just climbing through a window WB? If this was a lefty mob doing the same thing I would want our democracy protected regardless. She was part of a violent mob fighting against democracy. I do feel bad that she fed on Trump’s lies and hope that there is justice for the blood on that pos hands.
This is the part where I mention it wouldn't have happened had she just complied with the commands of the officers, right?
Okay, great. So she should have been arrested for trespassing and vandalism. But killing her was a clear case of excessive force.
If she had been black and Democrat, whole city blocks would have been burned and looted in her name, and her family would become overnight millionaires in an excessive force lawsuit against the Capitol police department.
Maybe, she shouldn't have been hanging around people that beat cops with American flag poles and fire extinguishers. She really sucked at decision making. Predictable results end up fairly predictable. This woman is no Crispus Attucks.
You understand what Babbit was doing beyond just climbing through a window WB? If this was a lefty mob doing the same thing I would want our democracy protected regardless. She was part of a violent mob fighting against democracy. I do feel bad that she fed on Trump’s lies and hope that there is justice for the blood on that pos hands.
No, she just climbed through a window, while BLM thug John Sullivan (pretending to be a Trump supporter) screamed "come on, come on, let's go". And then, stoking both sides to attack each other, Sullivan then pretended to be a reporter and walked to the other side, putting on his fake press badge and camera, and said to the police "Hey, I don't think you should stay here, I've seen a lot of officers to get hurt today, I don't want that to happen to you..."
All on video, M E M, if you cared what the truth was. Video RECORDED BY JOHN SULLIVAN HIMSELF, and posted and gloated about self-incriminatingly on social media, and gushed over on CNN. FOR WHICH HE WAS ARRESTED BY THE FBI.
You need to watch the video. Officers were overwhelmed by the mob and we’re just lucky there wasn’t more death. And I think you can count on trumpers getting treated like BLM’ers from now on.
You need to watch the video. Officers were overwhelmed by the mob and we’re just lucky there wasn’t more death. And I think you can count on trumpers getting treated like BLM’ers from now on.
I've seen the video. The one with Ashli Babbitt is not as you describe it:
I would point out that ALL the violence that day was pre-planned and reported to authorities up to a month in advance, and much of it was orchestrated by BLM and Antifa, and some of them have been arrested. The other "right wing" rioters, such as the Boogaloos (that are at least partially tied to BLM) and the right-wing militia Oath Keepers who I mentioned earlier, and possibly the Proud Boys (who in the video I saw didn't look like they could conquer a large cheese pizza), all planned their violence up to a month prior on social media (as NYPD got wind of weeks in advance, and warned FBI and DHS, who sat on their hands and let it happen, because they wanted it to happen, to feed the Democrat narrative of "dangerous white racist insurrectionists we have to crack down on"). And these fringe groups got in place for their planned mischief before Trump even spoke on Jan 6th. Some of them may have been "right wing", but they were not Trump supporters in the normal sense, nor were they motivated by Trump's speech on Jan 6th. They were too far away and mobilizing their pre-planned attacks while Trump was still speaking, 45 minutes walking-distance away.
A group pushing for election integrity and expunging the outdated voter-rolls in Wisconsin, of dead voters and other fraudulent voters, and mail-in ballots that allowed the 2020 election to be riigged.
You understand what Babbit was doing beyond just climbing through a window WB? If this was a lefty mob doing the same thing I would want our democracy protected regardless. She was part of a violent mob fighting against democracy. I do feel bad that she fed on Trump’s lies and hope that there is justice for the blood on that pos hands.
No, she just climbed through a window, while BLM thug John Sullivan (pretending to be a Trump supporter) screamed "come on, come on, let's go". And then, stoking both sides to attack each other, Sullivan then pretended to be a reporter and walked to the other side, putting on his fake press badge and camera, and said to the police "Hey, I don't think you should stay here, I've seen a lot of officers to get hurt today, I don't want that to happen to you..."
All on video, M E M, if you cared what the truth was. Video RECORDED BY JOHN SULLIVAN HIMSELF, and posted and gloated about self-incriminatingly on social media, and gushed over on CNN. FOR WHICH HE WAS ARRESTED BY THE FBI.
I love your "so gullible that all it took was one "lefty" guy to say "let's go" to turn thousands of Trump supporters into violent idiots in a frenzy" defense of these people.
A group pushing for election integrity and expunging the outdated voter-rolls in Wisconsin, of dead voters and other fraudulent voters, and mail-in ballots that allowed the 2020 election to be riigged.
Allow same day registration and other safeguards for those that “accidentally” get purged so that they are not disenfranchised too.
![[Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com]](http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a275/captainsammitch/boards/banners/blogban3.jpg)
[/center]![[Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com]](http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a275/captainsammitch/boards/banners/jlamiska.jpg)
[/center]
![[Linked Image from srnnews.com]](https://www.srnnews.com/media/2019/05/155785140921669hGhWMahsJ6-859x624.jpg)
![[Linked Image from funkyimg.com]](https://funkyimg.com/i/368wD.jpg)