"We have to blur some faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ," Johnson said Tuesday.
Openly talking about interfering with an DOJ investigation. Can't wait to see the spin doctoring on this one.
I guess this means the nutters are letting go of the myth about the traitors being ANTIFA plants.
In my opinion, Mike Johnson is not doing enough, and is too slow to release the 40,000 hours of surveilance video.
The video either proves or disproves whether protesters did something wrong on January 6th or not (whether ACTUAL Trump supporters, or false-flag Federal agents or Antifa DISGUISED as Trump supporters.
And the video released so far increasingly proves that the "insurrection/storming of the Capitol" was almost 100% a false Democrat narrative, that the video PROVES they did nothing wrong, and many long-time political prisoners, incarcerated for purely political Democrat-narrative reasons, have been released as a direct result. Beginning with Jacob Chansley, the "Quanon Shaman" guy. Imprisoned for more than 2 and 1/2 years, who video proves did absolutely nothing wrong. Tucker Carlson airing that video in April 2023, proving his innocence, is what finally got Chansley released. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Chans
Speaker Mike Johnson is acquiescing to Democrat and DOJ/FBI requests to digitally mask the faces of people in the crowds in the released surveillance. Which is infuriatingly opposite what should happen, it would hide the FBI, DHS and DC Metro police undercover faces, would hide that THEY incited, that THEY smashed windows, and THEY committed violence, that peaceful Trump supporters were blamed for. These agents should be exposed, arrested, prosecuted, and jailed. What they did is treason and war on the American people. And cheated Donald Trump and House/Senate Republicans and 74.3 million Trump voters of the ability to LEGALLY challenge the electoral votes in the illegitimate 2020 election. And that illegitimacy has now been proven a dozen different ways. (The CIA and Blinkin whipping up the false "51 intelligence experts" letter to claim the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation, Elllon Musk's exposure of the "Twitter Files" of federal agencies partnering with social media to censor conservative communication before the 2020 election, and maany other Democrat/Deep State tricks.)
Let the 40,000 hours of surveillance video be fully released, and be further proof of that.
Link for your partisan accusations WB However, other evidence omitted by Carlson shows that Chansley entered the Capitol without permission, was repeatedly asked to leave the building, and was not accompanied by cops at all times.
For instance, a statement signed by signed by Chansley and his attorney contradicts the suggestion that he was 'escorted' by cops throughout the riot.
The statement admits that Chansley entered the Capitol through a broken door as part of a crowd that 'was not lawfully authorized to enter or remain in the building' and that he was one of the first 30 rioters inside.
It also notes that although officers asked Chansley and others multiple times to leave the Capitol, he did not comply and actively urged on his fellow rioters.
What sickens me is Trump trying to protect not just all the rioters but even the ones that were beating on law enforcement. His special people. Johnson specifically states why republicans are blurring the faces so they won’t get charged. "We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don't want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ and to have other concerns and problems," Johnson said at a press conference.
As one example, read any Julie Kelly column for American Greatness over the last 3 years. Or her book on the subject.
In the January 6th topics, I've already provided dozens of links over the las 3 years. Asked and answered, abundantly.
Originally Posted by M E M
However, other evidence omitted by Carlson shows that Chansley entered the Capitol without permission, was repeatedly asked to leave the building, and was not accompanied by cops at all times.
For instance, a statement signed by signed by Chansley and his attorney contradicts the suggestion that he was 'escorted' by cops throughout the riot.
The statement admits that Chansley entered the Capitol through a broken door as part of a crowd that 'was not lawfully authorized to enter or remain in the building' and that he was one of the first 30 rioters inside.
That is again carefully worded deception. It is A FACT that video shows Chansle being escorted around the Capitol by at least 9 Capitol police officers. He was not rioting, he did not smash windows, he did not commit violence or threaen anyone. At most, Chansley was guilty of trespassing. That's it. Several of the 9 officers even opened doors for Chansley, far from restraining him or him offering any forcible entry.
Originally Posted by M E M
It also notes that although officers asked Chansley and others multiple times to leave the Capitol, he did not comply and actively urged on his fellow rioters.
If that were true and not total B.S. disproven by the surveillance video, Chansley would not have been released a few days after Tucker Carlson aired he video footage in April 2023.
That is another carefully worded deception that attempts to lyingly circumnavigate the facts. There is clear video released by Tucker Carlson that shows other Trump supporters in the Senate chamber, and an officer follows Chansley as he enter the room others were already in, and after Chansley growls a friendly hippie-ish "Heeeeeeeeeyyy" to the others already in the room, the officer tells all of them to be careful and not damage anything because this room is, like, the most sacred place in the building. But clearly they were NOT damaging anything, because the officer would be telling them to stop if hey were already doing so. The officer just passively stood there, and made no effort to either restrain them, or make them leave.
The Democrat narrative about January 6th as a terror threat or "insurrection" is completely disproven by the surveillance video.
And the smashed windows, I would lay money that was by undercover federal agents or DC Metro officers (DISGUISED AS Trump protesters) who smashed those windows, to allow people to passively walk in. As evidenced by the desperation of FBI to blur the faces in the video when released, to prevent FBI from being embarassed by the crimes committed by their own officers. AGAIN: That we know of so far, from their own admission, there were "at least 20" undercover FBI agents disguised as Trump supporters, at least 20 DHS agents (by DHS' own admission) undercover disguised as Trump supporters, a least 10 undercover DC Metro officers (by DC Matro's own admission) disguised as Trump supporters, and at least 20 Antifa led by John Earle Sullivan (and I've posted the video of them gloating about i repeatedly) DISGUISED as Trump supporters . And those are the ones that we know of, that they admit, so far. That's 70 fake Trump supporters, of the 600 "protesters" who entered the Capitol building that day. What are the odds (70 non-Trump disguised agents, vs. 60 total incidents of vandalism or violence) that most or all of the crimes alleged were by them, and not by ACTUAL Trump supporters ?
Originally Posted by M E M
What sickens me is Trump trying to protect not just all the rioters but even the ones that were beating on law enforcement. His special people. Johnson specifically states why republicans are blurring the faces so they won’t get charged. "We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don't want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ and to have other concerns and problems," Johnson said at a press conference.
What sickens me is your still reaching for and selling a false narrative, despite all that has been revealed that this was a complete FBI / DOJ/ DHS, and DC Metro false-flag set-up. The four officers in their house hearings testimony were clearly reading scripts, and could not even pronounce the words that were scripted for them to read !!!!! Your vicious Democrat-Bolshevik party has already shredded 40% of the Democrat "House Select Committee on January 6th" depositions and records, because it was clearly self-incriminatingly falsified evidence, and Committee Democrats shredded it so that it could not benefit he Republicans when hey took over the House majority in Jan 2023.
The four officers are clearly Democrat partisans. Michael Fanone (after saying in an interview that Republicans are ":a cancer that needs to be cut out"), became a pundit on CNN. Gee, what a surprise. Officer Harry Dunne turns out to be a Black Lives Matter advocate, who has a long history before Jan 6th of posting vitriolic stuff about Donald Trump and his supporters on social media long before January 6 2021.
I posted about all these 4 officers and their ridiculous Soviet style show trial testimony when they appeared in propaganda House committee hearings:
Speaker Nancy Pelosi has carefully tried to stage-manage the fallout of the Capitol riots. She has proposed a 9/11-style commission, headed by a blatantly partisan general, in order to purportedly get to the bottom of what really happened on January 6th.
The decision came on the same day she was served notice by high-ranking Republicans that she herself has many serious questions to answer regarding the Capitol attacks.
The questions include what she knew about reports of a planned attack on the Capitol building; why security requests from the former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was turned down by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms six times; and why the Capitol security was so woeful that police officers even held the doors open for rioters and gawked as unarmed miscreants took over the Senate chamber.
Speaker Pelosi is now being accused of having weakened security before and during the Capitol riots due to “optics.” A report from the Daily Caller citing multiple anonymous sources say the former House Sergeant at Arms is “covering for her.”
The Daily Caller provides a timeline that exposes the problematic timing of Irving reportedly being contacted on the request.
The New York Times previously reported that the Speaker’s office confirmed that the National Guard was approved around 1:43 pm. Sund said he sent a request for help from the National Guard to Irving around 1:09 p.m, according to CNN. Irving said he was contacted about the matter after 2:00 pm, Axios reported. Sources questioned how Irving got the request after 2 pm but Pelosi approved the request at 1:43 pm.
“If you believe Irving’s timeline that he testified under oath to, how could he ask for permission from the Speaker 20 minutes before he got the request?” one of the sources told the Daily Caller.
“Also if you believe his sworn testimony that he never had to run the request up the chain, why did the Speaker’s office confirm he did just that?” the same source continued.
“Irving is covering for Pelosi. There’s no doubt,” another said.
The Daily Caller explained why the sources are not currently public.
“The three sources who confirmed the discussion to the Daily Caller did so under the condition of anonymity, citing the fear of putting a chill on further witnesses to how the security situation unfolded Jan. 6,” the DC stated. “The discussion, if accurate, raises questions as to what role Pelosi’s office had in the security failures that resulted in the resignations of both Irving and former Chief of Capitol Police Steven Sund. Pelosi’s Deputy Chief of Staff Drew Hammill did not deny the allegations in a statement to the Daily Caller.”
The National Pulse reported that not only was there a delay getting approval, but that it took hours for more National Guard to be on the scene, despite supposedly being on ‘stand by.’
At 1:09pm, still before the President had finished speaking, Sund called the Sergeants-at-arms of the House and Senate. He told them it was time to call in the National Guard. He even said he wanted an emergency declaration. Both, however, said they would “run it up the chain” and get back to him.
At 1:50pm the Capitol itself was breached. Still before most Trump speech attendees could have arrived.
What happened after this point was a back and forth over hours between D.C. officials, Army officials, and Capitol police.
Eventually – at past 5pm – the National Guard arrived.
It is important to note that the questions are not merely about what happened during the confusion of the Capitol riots, but in the days prior.
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund told the Congress six times there was a high risk of rioting days before the building assault. After Speaker Pelosi forced Sund to resign following the riot, he wrote her a letter explaining exactly what went wrong. The House and Sergeant at arms were forced to resign.
“Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the ‘optics’ of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence,” NPR reported. “He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.”
His requests for additional National Guard troops would be turned down.
“Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he requested that the National Guard be placed on standby in the days before the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol, but House and Senate security officials turned him down,” the USA Today reported.
The risk of a violent riot breaking out at the January 6th Electoral College session of Congress, following a contested election that would see Donald Trump purportedly “incite” a protest, was anticipated in detail as early as last March.
This was revealed in a Time piece that exposes a full-out effort by radical groups, powerful corporations, and labor unions to “fortify” the U.S. election and keep it from being won by Donald Trump. The Time article also reveals coordination among these influential left-wing groups and radical activists to keep a low-profile at the riots.
Testimony was also entered into the Senate record today from J. Michael Waller, who attested that ‘agents provocateurs’ had infiltrated and agitated the Capitol Riots crowd.
Furthermore, concrete intelligence from early December suggesting foreign influence in the origins of the planned Capitol Building assault has since been reported by CBS News’ Catherine Herridge.
Everyone in D.C. had to have known it would be a powderkeg; just like it was following Donald Trump’s election and his inauguration in 2017, which also saw violent and destructive rioting.
In mid-November, Speaker Pelosi was asked about the propensity of Trump supporters for violence as long as the election objections continued.
Pelosi responded that the words of the president of the United States “weigh a ton,” and while President Trump did not create the problem of (right-wing) violence, “I think he fans the flames.”
“His words weigh a ton. They weigh a ton,” she said. “And people hear things in a way that could encourage some unfortunate situations, as they have done in the State of Michigan.” Pelosi was referring to a plot against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
“There is this element in our country — I don’t think Donald Trump created it, but I think he fans the flames,” he added. “And I think that’s a dangerous situation.”
Earlier, on June 2, 2020, Pelosi called Trump a “fanner of the flames” after police had cleared protesters from outside the White House a day before.
Nancy Pelosi therefore knew and even spoke about the threat from extremists before the Capitol riots.
Despite Speaker Pelosi’s paranoia about Trump supporters and her track record of blaming them for violence, there was a glaring lack of security prior to the extremists’ planned attack on the Capitol building.
Why?
The four police officers who tesitified on Tuesday, July 27 2021 in front of Nancy Pelosi's partisan House hearing committee...
Aquelino Gonnell, Capitol Police Sergeant
Michael Fanone, DC Metro Police officer
Daniel Hodges, DC Metro Police officer
Harry Dunn, U S Capitol Police officer
...have all been revealed to be hyper-partisan Democrats in previous interviews and in their own social media posts. They are rabidly anti-Trump, and were so long before Jan 6 2021.
And they were clearly reading partisan statements written for them, not in their own words. There was a uniformity to the fluffy language used in what they read. In the opening statement by Aquelino Gonnell in particular, this guy comes across as a semi-literate, and CLEARLY did not write some of the metaphorical flourishes tossed in his written statement someone else clearly wrote for him. They were clearly not his own vocabulary, and he stumbled to even read the script in front of him, stumbling on what were for him almost unpronounceable words in almost every sentence. It was unintentional comedy to watch.
McCarthy countered that Pelosi had named lawmakers who share her preconceived narrative of what happened that day while Trump was finishing a speech on the Ellipse not far from the Capitol.
“The speaker has structured this select committee to satisfy her political objectives,” McCarthy said in a public statement. “She had months to work with Republicans on a reasonable and fair approach to get answers on the events and security failures surrounding Jan. 6.”
Two other members of the select committee are widely known for their roles in Trump’s two impeachments by Pelosi’s House.
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He also led the team of House impeachment managers in the 2020 Senate impeachment trial of Trump. In that case, the Senate acquitted the 45th president on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
Another select committee member, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., led the team of impeachment managers in Trump’s second Senate trial early this year, when the Senate acquitted him on the charge of inciting an insurrection.
The other Democrats on the select committee are Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Pete Aguilar, both of California; Stephanie Murphy of Florida; and Elaine Luria of Virginia.
It's a partisan show-hearing, where no facts are gathered, just a pre-conceived Trump-hating narrative, where no facts are gathered to objectively challenge that thesis, just presenting opinionated propaganda from 4 Democrat- partisan officers to conform to that narrative. There are many other officers who could be called to challenge that narrative. There was no cross-examination of their stories, everything they said was taken at face value, and the only two Republicans on the committee (Rep Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney) were basically excommunicated from the party because these RINO "bipartisan Republican committee members" are basically Democrat agents who daily act to undermine their own party. And what they learn in private Republican meetings, they report back to Nancy Pelosi. They undermine their own party at every turn. https://dailycaller.com/2021/07/26/kevin-mccarthy-pelosi-cheney-kinzinger-jan-6-committee-congress/ https://dailycaller.com/2021/07/21/...ittee-jim-jordan-jim-banks-capitol-riot/
Michael Fanone is a Democrat fanatic, who said on video (I think for 60 Minutes) that the Republican party should be "carved out like a cancer". This jerk is another love-child of MSNBC and CNN, their biggest star since Stormy Daniels' creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti. He's a star on those networks only because he props up their lying narrative.
Harry Dunn over several years of social media posts describes Trump as "the racist in chief", with a Twitter hashtag by that name, among many other ultra-left partisan Democrat-Left posts. He has facebook posts of himself in Black Lives Matter clothing, expressing his support of BLM. I wonder how his fellow officers feel about that. He is anything but neutral or "just a cop doing [his] job.." He is a poisonous ideologue, hiding behind a veil of police "neutrality" that he clearly has never had. On Jan 6th, or at any time prior. And his allegations of taunts of "nigger" from the Jan 6th Capitol crowd (not one person, but by his account, the entire crowd was shouting epithets at him that day!) also rings false, and is just disgusting in its incendiary exploitation. I'm absolutely certain that the camera footage inside the Capitol that day, and the body-camera footage of himself and other officers does not verify that absurd allegation.
Likewise Daniel Hodges.
They all are clearly Democrats, and speak and act as Democrat agents, propping up the Democrat narrative. They didn't give objective reports in their House committee testimony, it was emotionally charged narrative, all using the same buzzwords like "terrorists", in statements they clearly did not write themselves.
Their testimony was fake propaganda then. It's still fake propaganda now.
And there's a 40% chance the Democrat "Select Committee on January 6th" has already shredded it.
The clear script-reading by these officers of their alleged own "testimony", that they can't even read or pronounce, is ripe for ridicule. They absolutely were participants in a Democrat-Bolshevik narrative, NOT presenting facts, or even speaking in their own words.
Note who’s trying to character assassinate the officers that were brutally beaten by the Trump supporters while trying to paint the same rioters as the victims. There isn’t even fake sympathy.
Note who’s trying to character assassinate the officers that were brutally beaten by the Trump supporters while trying to paint the same rioters as the victims. There isn’t even fake sympathy.
My cited facts, quoted above.
I'm not slandering anyone, it is A FACT these four officers could not even read or pronounce the words in their testimonies, CLEARLY not their own words, CLEARLY written for them by someone else, CLEARLY a lying Democrat narrative, NOT factual or accurate.
For example, officer Harry Dunn made the incendiary allegation that Trump protesters called him "nigger" over and over, about a hundred times amid he protest. But with hundreds of cel phones recording, and further media reporters with network cameras around him, NOT ONE video has come forward that validates his allegation. Likewise, Harry Dunn's social media posts, where FOR YEARS he railed with hatred on Trump and other Republicans, and voiced his eager support for Black Lives Matter and the Democrat/Left, even posting photos of himself at a Black Lives Matter protest, and wearing BLM clothing. It is a FACT he (Harry Dunn) is a Democrat partisan. Likewise Michael ("Republicans need to be cut out like a cancer") Fanone, now a paid consultant on CNN. Likewise the other two, by their own partisan remarks, for a rigged Soviet-style Democrat-controlled "House Select Comittee on January 6th". It is a FACT this Democrat committee's "evidence" was so self-incriminatingly deceitful, that they shredded 40% of the committee's records before the Republicans could get their hands on them to objectively investigate it, when Republicans gained the House majority in Jan 2023.
I fail to see what is an attempt to "character assassinate", I sourced and cited the objective facts, INCLUDING video of the full three hours of testimony by these four scripted and staged officers, who are clearly partisan Democrats, just reading a partisan narrative. NOT simply testifying in their own words about events they were involved in on January 6th protests, but clearly just reading a narrative with all the desired Democrat-narrative buzz-words, that was written by SOMEONE ELSE.
We all saw how law enforcement was treated on Jan 6. They were outnumbered and many were badly beaten. I watched as republicans squashed an independent commission afterwards. And than the efforts to hinder and attack the one the House had. Then retribution against any republican that wouldn’t choose Trump over the constitution. All the while painting people that were violent with law enforcement as the true victims vs the law enforcement that took the beating on Jan 6. In your partisan world these officers are the enemy because they were in Trump’s way on Jan 6 and they spoke up about it.
We all saw how law enforcement was treated on Jan 6. They were outnumbered and many were badly beaten. I watched as republicans squashed an independent commission afterwards. And than the efforts to hinder and attack the one the House had. Then retribution against any republican that wouldn’t choose Trump over the constitution. All the while painting people that were violent with law enforcement as the true victims vs the law enforcement that took the beating on Jan 6. In your partisan world these officers are the enemy because they were in Trump’s way on Jan 6 and they spoke up about it.
On Newsmax and on OAN, they repeatedly cited that NONE of these propaganda-martyr officers had any visible injuries. No bruises on their bodies and faces, no broken bones, no visible concussions. And these officers as I said had clear Democrat /Left associations in their social media posts, LONG before January 6th events.
I also notice you have absolutely no sympathy expressed for the 50 Secret Service agents who were significantly injured by Antifa/BLM's assault on the White House in May 2020, where they were so close to over-running the White House that they evacuated Trump to a more secure location. And that you also express no sympathy for the 2,000 officers injured nationwide in the BLM riots in 2000. The business looted and burned to the ground in 600 cities that won' be re-built. No sympathy by you for the 5 square miles of businesses looted and burned in your own native Minneapolis. No sympathy by you for the police precinct station in Minneapolis completely destroyed by BLM protesters. You have VERY selective and disproportionate outrage, ONLY for the Capitol riot. Where ZERO people were killed or injured by Trump protesters, but a least one (Ashlee Babbitt) , and possibly three more Trump protesters were killed by the actions of Capitol police, firing concussion grenades over and over into peaceful crowds, who were fragile due to pre-existing diagnosed medical conditions. Ashlee Babbitt was killed without any reasonable basis by Lt. Michael Byrd.
There was ONE apitol building entrance where there was a 30-minute clash with a handful of officers, who ultimately --ON VIDEO-- completely repelled the protesters from the Capitol entrance after about 30 minutes. To repel them, they still clearly had their full strength, and could not have pushed them out like that if they were injured. So that "police badly beaten"is a clearly false Democrat January 6th narrative.
** AND** I'm thoroughly convinced that the violent mob of "Trump supporters" who clashed with police were actually NOT Trump supporters but were instead "at least 20" undercover FBI agents disguised as Trump supporters, "at least 20" DHS agents disguised as Trump supporters, and "at least 10" DC Metro undercover police officers disguised as Trump supporters. By hese law enforcement agencies' own admission. And only the ones they have admitted so far.
As well as roughly 20 Antifa (led by John Earle Sullivan) who just happened to be in the room where Ashlee Babbitt was murdered, and just happened to photograph that shooting by TWO different Antifa persons, from two different angles. How do we know this? Because Antifa posted the video all over the internet, and openly claimed it. You can see John Earle Sullivan PRETENDING to be a reporter, and hear his videotaped words as he tried to scare the officers in the room to make them over-react, right before Lt Michael Byrd shot an UNARMED Ashlee Babbitt to death. How he is still an officer, and not in jail on criminal charges, is an outrage.
I'm sure the 40,000 hours of released Capitol security video will further vindicate the Trump supporters accused of "violence", a clearly false narrative, by a Democrat-weaponized DOJ and FBI. In video after video, Capitol police LET Trump supporters in the building, stood like an honor guard doing nothing to stop them as they walked in, shook hands with them, took selfies with them. Capitol police then walked around the Capitol with them, doing NOTHING physically or verbally to encourage them to leave. In video after video. And to hell wih any "masking" or blurring of the 40,000 hours of footage released, I want THE FACES of every violent protester and vandal shown, and I am 100% sure it will reveal FBI, DHS, DC METRO agents to be the perpetrators **NOT** Trump supporters. If Speaker Mike Johnson fails to secure the full video released, no blurred or "masked", he is helping these Democrat / Deep State rogue agents to frame Trump supporters.
As I've said repeatedly, there were (as reported by Jack Posobiec for OAN, with video evidence) even by Capitol undercover police surveillance estimates "well over 100,000 protesters" there that day. There were at least 6,000 "PEACEFUL and patriotic" protesters standing directly outside the Capitol area, peacefully supporting the Republican House and Senate members LEGALLY challenging the electoral vote. There are MANY, MANY videos of (apparent undercover FBI or Antifa) smashing windows WHO WERE STOPPED by ACTUAL Trump supporters. Over and over. There were only about 600 protesters who went inside the Capitol building, almost all only guilty of "trespassing" (tricked into entering by having barricades removed by police or false-flag agents before Trump protesters even got to the Capitol building. Or tricked by police who INVITED Trump protesters inside. With tons of video evidence to confirm that. And of those 600 who went inside, maybe 10%, about 60 who committed any vandalism or violence, who either clashed with police, or mostly lesser offenses, smashed windows, or stole letters, or Pelosi's podium.
And I'm absolutely convinced that the tiny amount of violence or vandalism that DID occur was committed by false-flag agents (either Federal agents or Antifa) TO FRAME Trump supporters. The guy who was photographed propping his feet up on a desk in Pelosi's outer office (Richard Barnett), said he tried o leave, but others (false-flag FBI) blocked the doorway so he could not leave, and encouraged him to sit at that desk for a photo THEY TOOK. Agents of your 97% Democrat FBI / DOJ , not what the guy himself ever chose to do. (If you didn't know, FBI is a subordinate subdivision of the DOJ. And we've seen over the last 7 years how rabidly anti-Trump/ anti-Republican FBI and DOJ are. The farcical FBI sting over a fake plot to kidnap Michigsn Governor Gretchen Whitmer, whose Trump-hating supervisor insead of being fired was promoted to oversee the FBI's January 6th prottest surveillance. Robert Mueller, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, Bill Priestap, Kevin Clinesmith, Bruce and Nellie Ohr, on down. Pretty much the entire DOJ /FBI leadership, if not the agency's grassroots agents as well.)
"Quanon Shaman" guy Jacob Chansley, once a centerpiece of the Democrat Jan 6th narrative, has been completely vindicated. What exactly did he spend 2 and a half years in a federal prison for, without trial, without legal representation, in awful conditions ? To be a prop for a Democrat/FBI propaganda false narrative. Likewise Richard Barnett.
I notice that George Orwell's Wikipedia propaganda listing for January 6th has been edited about a hundred times, with omissions of things (with no explanation) that have PROVEN to be false. It was initially a page titled "January 6th insurrection". Then when the "insurrection" narrative was proven false, it was changed without explanation or apology to "January 6th storming of the Capitol". Changed again when that was also proven a false narrative. Currently it is softened to "January 6th United States Capitol attack". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
See also the two documentaries that run about once a month on Newsmax, usually on the weekend or late at night : Day of Outrage - 1 hour, on the events of January 6h, as detailed by protesters, journalists, police, political leaders, who were there.
And even better :
Shame of a Nation - 1 hour, on the set-up, false-flag operations, and unconstitutional treatment of January 6th prisoners, harassed, intimidated and extorted into signing false confessions, just to end their ordeal, under the cruelest incarceration, deprived completely of Constitutional rights, lawyers, and even visits with their wives and children. Their jobs and businesses destroyed, without the slightest proof or legal process to prove they did anything wrong. Four have committed suicide in despair. All just to create the false narrative of "dangerous white racist insurrectionist Trump supporters". It shows FBI in advance set up "geo-fence" technology to record the cel phones for identification of everyone in or near the Capitol area, so FBI could round them up as props for their false narrative after Jan 6th. Technology they have NEVER used against islamic terrorists, Antifa, Black Lives Matter, or other domestic violent leftist groups, no matter how much ACTUAL evidence there is of crimes by those on the Democra/Left. Because they are the storm trooper and intimidation wing of the Democrat party itself, and therefore brothers in arms with the 97% Democrat loyalist FBI and DOJ. Only 600 went inside the Capitol on January 6th, only 60 committed any vandalism or violence. And yet FBI (as directed by Merrick Garland) has arrested 1,300 protesters (except, of course Ray Epps and other federal agents, who ACTUALLY smashed windows and led violence that day, probably most of the 60). And they have still made even more arrests 3 years later, in the last montth ! Just to prop up a false Democrat narrative.
At this point I’m just assuming your long rants are full of disinformation WB. Jacob Chansley entered in through a broken door and there is video of him being asked to leave… “ Many of Chansley’s actions on Jan. 6 are documented in video footage from that day.
Chansley pleaded guilty in September 2021 to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding. He was sentenced in November 2021 to 41 months in prison for his guilty plea, as well as 36 months of supervised release and a fine of $2,000 in restitution.
Asked about claims that protesters were led through the building, a Capitol Police spokesperson pointed The Associated Press to an HBO documentary about the riot, “Four Hours at the Capitol,” in which an officer describes his encounter with Chansley, including how he asked the rioter and others to leave the Senate wing.
Footage from the interaction, which appears in the documentary at the approximately 47:30 mark, was filmed by New Yorker writer Luke Mogelson.
“Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”
A video of Chansley walking into the Capitol through the broken door is publicly available on the website of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger lambasted Carlson’s segment on the Jan. 6 footage in an internal memo Tuesday. The Capitol Police spokesperson confirmed the memo’s authenticity to the AP.
“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,” Manger wrote. “The opinion program never reached out to the Department to provide accurate context. One false allegation is that our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides.’ This is outrageous and false.” AP
To your point about me not having sympathy for law enforcement when it was protests from the left, there’s at least a few threads on this board where I think show a difference. I even started a thread about the Twin Cities burning. I didn’t paint the violent protesters as victims in any way or the law enforcement that was trying to restore order as the bad guys. I supported the national guard coming in. I think there was a lot of you trying to paint most of the protesters as thugs and deserving of rough treatment even though most were peaceful. Remember conservatives in general really hating the term “mostly peaceful “? Of course it’s different when Trump supporters are beating on law enforcement in a large crowd of MAGA watching it. There wasn’t sympathy by me for those arrested for trespassing or the sad and very transparent partisan attacks on law enforcement for doing their jobs seen here by you. I guess after supporting Trump’s attempt to steal the election this stuff comes pretty easy for you now.
At this point I’m just assuming your long rants are full of disinformation WB. Jacob Chansley entered in through a broken door and there is video of him being asked to leave… “ Many of Chansley’s actions on Jan. 6 are documented in video footage from that day.
Chansley pleaded guilty in September 2021 to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding. He was sentenced in November 2021 to 41 months in prison for his guilty plea, as well as 36 months of supervised release and a fine of $2,000 in restitution.
Asked about claims that protesters were led through the building, a Capitol Police spokesperson pointed The Associated Press to an HBO documentary about the riot, “Four Hours at the Capitol,” in which an officer describes his encounter with Chansley, including how he asked the rioter and others to leave the Senate wing.
Footage from the interaction, which appears in the documentary at the approximately 47:30 mark, was filmed by New Yorker writer Luke Mogelson.
“Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”
A video of Chansley walking into the Capitol through the broken door is publicly available on the website of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger lambasted Carlson’s segment on the Jan. 6 footage in an internal memo Tuesday. The Capitol Police spokesperson confirmed the memo’s authenticity to the AP.
“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,” Manger wrote. “The opinion program never reached out to the Department to provide accurate context. One false allegation is that our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides.’ This is outrageous and false.” AP
To your point about me not having sympathy for law enforcement when it was protests from the left, there’s at least a few threads on this board where I think show a difference. I even started a thread about the Twin Cities burning. I didn’t paint the violent protesters as victims in any way or the law enforcement that was trying to restore order as the bad guys. I supported the national guard coming in. I think there was a lot of you trying to paint most of the protesters as thugs and deserving of rough treatment even though most were peaceful. Remember conservatives in general really hating the term “mostly peaceful “? Of course it’s different when Trump supporters are beating on law enforcement in a large crowd of MAGA watching it. There wasn’t sympathy by me for those arrested for trespassing or the sad and very transparent partisan attacks on law enforcement for doing their jobs seen here by you. I guess after supporting Trump’s attempt to steal the election this stuff comes pretty easy for you now.
What you say is such a lie that, when Tucker Carlson released the actual security video of Chansley from January 6th, it was SO INCRIMINATING that... Chansley was immediately released from jail. That's it. That's all.
Chansley didn't break a window, he only afterward followed the crowd inside and walked around. No police officer grabbed him, no one urged him to leave. As Tucker Carlson said repeatedly, there were at least 9 Capitol police officers who walked around inside the Capitol wih Chansley. They DIDN'T ask Chansley to leave. They DIDN'T try to physically make him leave.
Chansley DIDN'T commit any vandalism or violence. He came in after windows were broken and just walked around. I've seen nothing anywhere to confirm your allegaion that "Chansley came in through a broken window." That is a false or at best unproven aallegation.
So at the very most, Chansley could only be prosecuted fairly for "trespassing", not all the overblown charges of attempting to obstruct a federal proceeding and other charges, that under duress he was forced to plead guilty to, to end his lengthy prison ordeal. And when the truth was revealed later by THE VIDEO EVIDENCE by Tucker Carlson, the Bolsheviks were forced o release him from jail. Because VIDEO proved he was not guilty of what FBI prosecuted him for.
There's one scene that almost halfway goes along with your narrative, ((slice and diced by AP) where several other guys were in the Senate chamber, and Chansley walks in the room and growls a friendly "Heeeeeeeeeeeyy" to other protesters. But Chansley committed no vandalism or violence, and a few seconds after Chansley entered the Senate chamber, a Capitol officer (as you said, sort of ) sheepishly walked in the room and just stood there, doing nothing to encourage any of them to leave. And the Capitol officer said "Hey, y'know, just don't damage anything in here, because this is, like, the most sacred room in the building." And they didn't. The guard DIDN'T tell them to leave. The guard DIDN'T make any effort to physically make them leave. It was much more passive than you portray it, NOT a command. And as I said, there are many videos (without even the full 40,000 hours released) that show protesters in friendly interactions inside the Capitol with police officers, shaking hands, taking selfies, and just wandering around. Not at all how you try to portray it.
That's the closest to true of anything you said. And it's still factually way off the mark.
The VIDEO doesn't lie. And that's why Democrats are desperate to keep it hidden. Because it shows (in opposition to the Democrat narrative) what ACTUALLY HAPPENED.
"...his release comes weeks after new video evidence emerged, showing Chansley walking with Capitol police who seemed NOT concerned about him posing any danger.. The video led to his lawyer demanding he be released..."
Just as with Rep.Adam Schiff hiding the closed-door testimony during the Trump-Russia collusion false narrative... this Democrat-suppressed Capitol security video is the only thing that made this Democrat lie, for a while, SEEM true.
“Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”
Right there on video he was asked to leave. You can continue your attempts at disinformation all you want. Your loyalty to Trump and party over country isn’t shocking anymore.
“Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”
Right there on video he was asked to leave. You can continue your attempts at disinformation all you want. Your loyalty to Trump and party over country isn’t shocking anymore.
That's garbage, and YOU KNOW it's garbage.
YOU have chosen party loyalty over country, as you continue to support a Democrat-Bolshevik Culural Marxist party that consisently weaponizes federal agencies against its political opposition since at least 2009, weaponizes law (in the form of "lawfare"), and openly worships Saul Alinsky, Che Gueverra, Fidel Castro, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Hugo Chavez, and many other Marxists they OPENLY QUOTE. Bill and Hillary Clinton (HIllary wrote her theseis on Saul Alinsky, and is indoctrinated in Alinsky tactics, almost worked for him, and in letters expressed wild enthusiasm at the release of his book RULES FOR RADICALS.) Barack and Michelle Obama. https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/barack-hussein-obama/ Bernie Sanders. https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/?s=berniee+sanders
Anita Dunn : "My two most quoted sources, the Pope and Mao Tse Tung." Ron Bloom : "We agree with Mao, that capitalism is mostly a sham, and that power is mostly administered at the barrel of a gun." Mark Lloyd , on Hugo Chavez's marxist state takeover of Venezuelan media : "Very effective, and a good model to follow." Van Jones, on Soros patterned marxist revolutions, by coordinating higher elected marxists and grassroots radicals: "Top down, bottom up, inside out." Valerie Jarrett, in Obama's White House, described by staffers as "the second half of Obama's brain". https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/?s=valerie+jarrett
Bernie Sanders. Elizabeth Warren. A O-C and the whole "squad". Cory Booker. Hakkim Jeffries.
And pretty much all the subordinates in the Clinton and Obama administrations. And below in the federal agencies they've hijacked.
And I have already posted both the quotes, and Democrats quoting them IN VIDEOTAPED COMMENTS here, over and over, for years, all along the same lines of "We agree with Mao, that capitalism is mostly a sham, and that power is mostly administered at the barrel of a gun.". We've certainly seen plenty of manifestations of THAT on display since 2009, during both the Obama and Biden administrations. And in the Democrat-Bolshevik James Comeys and Peter Strzoks and Bruce Ohrs and John Brennans, weaponizing their federal agencies even during the Trump administration, against the Trump administration itself.
Yours is the party of Marxism and chaos. Oppositte that, Trump and his movement are trying TO SAVE and restore our Constitutional republic, from the monsters who run the Democrat party, and their deep state agents abusing our federal agencies, who are openly trying to turn his country into a one-party authoritarian Marxist / Socialist state.
I also notice that even after about 15 years of my citing the threat of Cultural Marxism and its close to unanimous control of the Democrat party, you've never denied that you're a Cultural Marxist. Despite how often I've cited how it infests and ideologically drives every corner of the Democrat party. From the Clintons to the Obamas, Bernie Sanders, A O-C, on down. You certainly ascribe to their propaganda tactics.
So in response to a video showing he was asked to leave after you repeatedly have asserted that he was never asked to leave you proclaim I know it’s garbage. Your false assertions certainly are as your shaman was clearly asked to leave in video. He participated in an attempt to stop the constitutional transfer of power. That isn’t a small thing WB nor do I believe for a minute you would feel the same way if he had been a liberal protester. It was of course something you wanted to happen. Your pretense that you support the constitution and the rule of law is truly what you’re revealing to be garbage.
So in response to a video showing he was asked to leave after you repeatedly have asserted that he was never asked to leave you proclaim I know it’s garbage. Your false assertions certainly are as your shaman was clearly asked to leave in video. He participated in an attempt to stop the constitutional transfer of power. That isn’t a small thing WB nor do I believe for a minute you would feel the same way if he had been a liberal protester. It was of course something you wanted to happen. Your pretense that you support the constitution and the rule of law is truly what you’re revealing to be garbage.
So in response to a video showing he was asked to leave after you repeatedly have asserted that he was never asked to leave you proclaim I know it’s garbage. Your false assertions certainly are as your shaman was clearly asked to leave in video. He participated in an attempt to stop the constitutional transfer of power. That isn’t a small thing WB nor do I believe for a minute you would feel the same way if he had been a liberal protester. It was of course something you wanted to happen. Your pretense that you support the constitution and the rule of law is truly what you’re revealing to be garbage.
The video clearly shows Quanon Shaman guy committed no violence, and was never commanded to leave, or physically pressed by police to leave. Despite your sophistry to try and circumnavigate the truth, the Capitol officer in the video NEVER commanded Jacob Chansley to leave, it was very passive and never rose o the level of a command to leave. Quite the opposite, this Capitol officer and a total of 9 Capitol officers walked around the building with Chansley, and NEVER verbally or physically pressed Cansley or the others to leave.
You try to portray this as some kind of "violent insurrecion" on Chansley's part. But when the video was revealed it was SO INCRIMINATING THAT...
FBI was forced to admit that Chansley was NOT guilty of what FBI alleged, and he was immediately released from jail. After 2 and 1/2 years in jail, imprisoned FOR NO REASON.
My FACTS, your transparent lies, the truth is exposed despite your desperate grasp for another Bolshevik narrative. It doesn't fly. Chansley was released, because he is demonstrably innocent. As are so many others unjustly jailed after January 6h.
So in response to a video showing he was asked to leave after you repeatedly have asserted that he was never asked to leave you proclaim I know it’s garbage. Your false assertions certainly are as your shaman was clearly asked to leave in video. He participated in an attempt to stop the constitutional transfer of power. That isn’t a small thing WB nor do I believe for a minute you would feel the same way if he had been a liberal protester. It was of course something you wanted to happen. Your pretense that you support the constitution and the rule of law is truly what you’re revealing to be garbage.
Just reposting to show that you’re the one peddling a false narrative WB.
So in response to a video showing he was asked to leave after you repeatedly have asserted that he was never asked to leave you proclaim I know it’s garbage. Your false assertions certainly are as your shaman was clearly asked to leave in video. He participated in an attempt to stop the constitutional transfer of power. That isn’t a small thing WB nor do I believe for a minute you would feel the same way if he had been a liberal protester. It was of course something you wanted to happen. Your pretense that you support the constitution and the rule of law is truly what you’re revealing to be garbage.
Just reposting to show that you’re the one peddling a false narrative WB.
It is a fact that the Capitol officer did NOT command Jacob Chansley or anyone else to leave. Very passively he said "any chance I could persuade you to leave?" That is NOT a command. The Capitol officer did not say "Leave now." The officer did NOT say "I'm going to arrest you for trespassing" The officer DID NOT say these things.
And it is a FACT that Chansley is videotaped walking casually around inside the Capitol, accompanied by at least 9 different officers. NONE of whom told him to leave, NONE of them tried to restrain Chansley or the other trespassers. Quite the contrary, the Capitol officers just stood there as protesters casually walked in, and even talked with hem and took selfie photos with them. So what you say is clearly a lie.
It is a FACT that when Tucker Carlson played the security video on his show in April 2023, revealing he evidence to millions of people, FBI was forced to abandon their narrative about him, and quitetly release him from jail. FACT. FACT !
How many billion times have I said this? There were about 6,000 protesters peacefully protesting outside the Capitol. Of those, about 600 went inside the Capitol, most of them invited in by the officers on duty, who even ( ON VIDEO) held the double doors wide open for protesters to enter. Of that 600, only about 60 in any way committed any vandalism or violence. And as I said, that is PROVEN by the 40,000 hours of surveillance video.
And very mysteriously, the worst offenders briefly put up on FBI's website for identification, before FBI took down their photos, never identified them, never arrested them, never imprisoned these false-flag agents. (Ray Epps, for example.) Because clearly, they were FBI undercover agents, [i]disguised as[i] Trump supporter, false-flag agents WHO WERE SENT THERE TO FRAME Trump supporters. And Antifa, doing the same thing. So instead of arresting the ACTUAL violent protesters and vandals, FBI for pure propaganda narrative purposes, is incarcerating the real estate agents and grandmas who only trespassed inside the Capitol. Even if Chansley was "guilty" of some crime, as you hysterically project a narrative for, all he did ( beyond any dispute, verified ON SURVEILLANCE VIDEO ) is walk around inside the Capitol. So his only crime, at most, is trespassing. The innocent people your side maliciously propagandized for 3 years as "INSURRECTIONISTS"
You can't have an "insurrection" without guns. But by the FBI's own admission ( AGAIN: Jill Sanborn, FBI's assistant director of counter-terrorism, who led the FBI investigation of the January 6th riots, in her Senate testimony) said there was NOT ONE firearm confiscated anywhere in Washington Square that day. There goes your total B.S. narrative. No military/insurrection seizure of government buildings, police stations, infrastructure, communications centers, none of that. Even the FBI admitted there was "no organized insurrection." The Democrat narrative is A LIE. Pure and simple. It is A LIE.
FBI held honest working people and business owners and grandmas in federal prison, without even decent drinking water, prison guards forced INNOCENT people to drink moldy water out of toilets for 3 years and counting, just to humiliate them, that denied them due process, denied them access to attorneys, many kept in solitary confinement for months, beaten by guards in their cells, unable to even have their wives and children visit. All done just so FBI could extort confessions and plea deals for crimes they DID NOT commit, which they did just to end their ordeal. Innocent first amendment PEACEFUL protesters, who have lost their jobs and businesses and had their homes foreclosed for no good reason, without even a trial to determine whether they were actually guilty of a crime.
And SIMULTANEOUSLY... FBI let all the ACTUAL vandals and violent offenders go, most of them never even arrested. Because they were the FBI's own storm trooper. Or Antifa. John Earle Sullivan and his 20 or so Antifa group members, were in the House office room when Ashli Babbitt was shot, and THEY ORCHESTRATED the situation so they could videotape it, FROM TWO ANGLES, BY TWO DIFFERENT PERSONS there to videotape it. And yet... John Earle Sullivan was not forced to remain incarcerated for months and years, and have HIS home foreclosed, or lose HIS job. And he is free to spread his propaganda hate every day for the last 3 years on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and the rest. Even as President Trump in that same 3 years, was instantly banned from these platforms, the moment he conceded the election on January 6 2021.
Who is the terrorist, who orchestrated the actual death of Ashli Babbitt ? And conversely, who just told his supporters to exert their first amendment right to "PEACEFULLY and patriotically" assemble and petition their government, to protest outside the Capitol, in support of Republican Senate and House members, who inside were LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY challenging the electoral votes of a rigged 2020 presidential election ?
The FBI had so many paid informants at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, that it lost track of the number and had to perform a later audit to determine exactly how many “Confidential Human Sources” run by different FBI field offices were present that day, a former assistant director of the bureau has told lawmakers.
At least one informant was communicating with his FBI handler as he entered the Capitol, according to Steven D’Antuono, formerly in charge of the bureau’s Washington field office.
D’Antuono has testified behind closed doors to the House Judiciary Committee that his office was aware before the riot that some of their informants would attend a “Stop the Steal” rally thrown by former President Donald Trump, but he only learned after the fact that informants run by other field offices also were present, along with others who had participated of their own accord.
The Washington field office had to ask FBI headquarters “to do a poll or put out something to people saying w[ere] any CHSs involved,” he said, so they could get a handle on the scale of the FBI’s spying operations at the Capitol that day.
“We started getting responses back” from FBI headquarters, added D’Antuono, which helped identify which field offices had planted confidential informants in the crowd.
One paid informant from the Kansas City field office was at the Capitol as the crowd surged inside and allegedly was in communication with his FBI handler “while they were in the crowd, I think, saying that they were going in,” according to the former bureau brass.
“They were trying to stop some of the action happening and they left or whatnot.”
Asked how many informants the audit discovered were in the crowd that day, D’Antuono would only say “a handful.”
The FBI spends an average of $42 million each year in payments to its Confidential Human Sources, according to the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General, which has raised concerns about the vetting process for these paid informants.
In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Tuesday, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) described D’Antuono’s testimony as “extremely concerning.”
It suggests that “the FBI cannot adequately track the activities and operations of its informants, and that it lost control of its CHSs present at the Capitol on January 6,” he wrote.
“These revelations reinforce existing concerns, identified by Special Counsel [John] Durham, about the FBI’s use of, and payment to, CHSs who have fabricated evidence and misrepresented information.
“The Justice Department Inspector General also identified critical problems in the FBI’s CHS program,” Jordan added, “including the FBI’s failure to fully vet CHSs and the FBI’s willingness to ignore red flags that would call into question an informant’s reliability.”
Jordan has asked Wray to provide a “substantive briefing” on how the FBI used paid informants on Jan. 6, 2021, and “any specific guidelines or admonishments that were provided to FBI CHSs prior to deploying.”
Wray has also been asked to provide all debriefing documents received from Capitol riot informants.
Jordan also wants source reporting documentation relating to former British spy Christopher Steele, who was responsible for a now-notorious “dossier of false allegations about the Trump-Russia hoax.”
The number of FBI informants present during the Capitol riot has long been a controversial topic at trials of the hundreds of defendants apprehended since that day.
Defense lawyers at the trial of five “Proud Boys” recently asserted that the FBI had as many as eight informants spying on the organization and that at least one was with them at the Capitol that day. Former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund has said that, in addition to the paid informants, the FBI had at least 18 undercover agents in the crowd plus an estimated 20 from the Department of Homeland Security.
Up till now RebelNews and American Greatness, and RevolverNews had confirmed from the FBI's own investigative reports there were "at least 20" FBI agents in the crowd disguised as Trump supporters. Plus another 20 or so Antifa disguised as Trump supporters, led by John Earle Sullivan, and extensively evidenced on the internet in their own videos. Plus another 10 undercover DC Metro police officers disguised as Trump supporters, that they admitted to (and I linked) a few months ago.
And now the FBI is admitting that they "can't even count" how many FBI fake protesters disguised as Trump supporters were there that day. And "an estimated 20 from the Department of Homeland Security." Plus whatever else they admit to in the future when forced by further evidence revealed.
So... are these still "MAGA civil war fantasies"... if they're now proven to be TRUE ?!?
I predicted two years ago the truth would come out, and it has. And this isn't even the full extent of authoritarian deep state war on Trump supporters, just what we know so far, with more to come.
Keep in mind also that the Democrat-Bolshevik "select committee on January 6th" has already shredded 40% of their own Bolshevik narrative. Because they know it is false, and if it still existed, it would be exposed and vindicate Trump, vindicate Trump's indicted cabinet members, and vindicate the 1,300 or so mostly innocent people who have been jailed , prosecuted and intimidated into plea deals for crimes they did not commit. Persecuted for almost 3 years, FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON, other than to prop up a Democrat narrative and Bolshevik power grab. If not shredded, a year or so from now the Democrats' own records would be used to prosecute them, therefore the Democrat-Bolsheviks had to shred them.
He was asked to leave WB. You have been fully exposed as the one running with a false narrative. What these people did wasn’t acceptable nor can we continue as a functioning government if a group of people can shut down the transfer of power because their lying loser wants to stay in power.
He was asked to leave WB. You have been fully exposed as the one running with a false narrative. What these people did wasn’t acceptable nor can we continue as a functioning government if a group of people can shut down the transfer of power because their lying loser wants to stay in power.
If I'm the one "exposed", M E M, why was Jacob Chansley immediately released from jail when the security video was released in April 2023? YOU are the propagandist. When the leftist false narrative that he was a "violent insurrectionist" was exposed as OBVIOUSLY false (by SECURITY VIDEO EVIDENCE), he was released. Up til then, while Democrats hid the evidence for 2 and a half years, they were able to front that narrative.
THE MOMENT that video surveillance was released, the rationalization to keep Chansley in jail evaporated, and the [Democrat-Bolshevik] injustice of keeping him in jail was exposed. And Chansley was released.
He served most of his sentence and was released early for good behavior. Happens all the time. Your speculation and downright false claims don’t add up to proof WB.
“ Early Release of ‘QAnon Shaman’ Due to Plea and Prison Protocols, Contrary to Online Claims By Brea Jones
Posted on April 5, 2023
Quick Take Jacob Chansley, also known as the “QAnon Shaman,” was sentenced to 41 months in prison for participating in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, but he was released early to a halfway house on March 28 because of his plea agreement and prison protocols. Social media posts falsely claim that his release was due to videos shown by Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson.
Full Story On Jan. 6, 2021, the U.S. Capitol building was stormed by a mob of more than 2,000 protesters driven by false claims that the 2020 election was “stolen” — a narrative pushed by former President Donald Trump and other Republicans. More than 1,000 people have been arrested for the assault on the Capitol, including more than 500 who have pleaded guilty, according to the Department of Justice.
One of the high-profile arrests was Jacob Chansley, also known as the “QAnon Shaman” or Jake Angeli, who was filmed and photographed inside the Capitol during the riot wearing a horned, furry headdress, face paint and no shirt.
Chansley pleaded guilty to one count of obstruction of an official proceeding as part of a plea deal with the government.
Chansley, who was one of the first 30 people to enter the Capitol building, faced a maximum of 20 years in prison for his obstruction charge but received a 41-month sentence on Nov. 17, 2021. He was also required to pay $2,000 in restitution for damages at the Capitol.
At his sentencing, Chansley said, “I was wrong for entering the Capitol… I have no excuse. No excuse whatsoever. The behavior is indefensible.”
Due to Federal Bureau of Prisons protocols and his plea agreement, Chansley — who had served 16 months of his prison sentence — was transferred to a halfway house in Phoenix on March 28 and is expected to be released on May 25.
But posts on social media falsely claim that Chansley was released early from prison because videos shared by Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson proved his innocence.
As we previously wrote, Carlson on his March 6 show advanced the false narrative that the rioters “were not insurrectionists, they were sightseers,” using surveillance footage from that day that he had obtained from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. “The tapes show the Capitol Police never stopped Jacob Chansley. They helped him. They acted as his tour guides,” Carlson falsely claimed.
“BREAKING NEWS: ‘QAnon Shaman’ Jacob Chansley is freed from prison 14 months early after his lawyer said J6 footage showing him being escorted into Senate by cops was exculpatory,” read a post on Facebook.
Another post claimed, “Q Shaman has been RELEASED following video evidence showing that January 6 was a hoax & inside job!”
But the claims in the posts are wrong.
Chansley’s move to a halfway house wasn’t connected to the recently released videos.
Albert Watkins, the lawyer who represented Chansley during the trial, told us in an email, “The release of Mr. Chansley was solely a decision of the Bureau of Prisons and was based on the plea agreement, sentence, and the protocols of the Bureau of Prisons.”
“It was a decision which was part of an established protocol in place since well prior to the release of the videos,” Watkins said.
Emery Nelson, a spokesperson for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, told us in an email, “Jacob Anthony Chansley transferred on March 28, 2023, from the Federal Correctional Institution Safford to community confinement overseen by the Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) Phoenix Residential Reentry Management (RRM) Office.”
“Community confinement means the inmate is in either home confinement or a Residential Reentry Center (RRC, or halfway house). Mr. Chansley’s projected release date from custody is May 25, 2023, via First Step Act release,” Nelson said.
Nelson directed us to more information on the First Step Act, a law passed in 2018 that required the attorney general to develop a system for the Bureau of Prisons to assess the recidivism risk and needs of federal prisoners.
“While we don’t discuss a specific inmate’s release method, we can share that an inmate may earn good conduct time. Prior to the FSA, qualifying inmates earned up to 54 days of good conduct time for each year served” and the bureau “pro-rated the amount of good conduct time earned for the final year of service of sentence. Under the amendments made by the FSA, qualifying inmates will be eligible to earn up to 54 days of good conduct time for each year of the sentence imposed by the court,” Nelson said.” Factcheck
![[Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com]](http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a275/captainsammitch/boards/banners/blogban3.jpg)
[/center]![[Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com]](http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a275/captainsammitch/boards/banners/jlamiska.jpg)
[/center]
