RKMBs Forums .::Robegories::. Comic Books DC Comics Under Fire for Hiring Anti-Gay Author Orson Scott Card to Write Superman

Ahead of the release of this summer’s Superman film Man of Steel, DC Entertainment is launching a new digital anthology of short comics starring the last son of Krypton entitled Adventures of Superman. Unfortunately, the series is being launched with a story written by Ender’s Game author and outspoken homophobe Orson Scott Card, leading to an online backlash against both the project and the publisher. After all, doesn’t Superman stand against such bigotry?

News of Adventures of Superman broke last Wednesday, with Card listed as co-writer on the first two installments (Aaron Johnston, who has previously worked with Card on Marvel’s Ender’s Game comics as well as a number of science fiction novels, is the other writer, with Chris Sprouse and Karl Story illustrating). Almost immediately, internet reaction condemned Card’s involvement in the title, suggesting that it was tantamount to DC supporting his views on homosexuality.

Card, who is a board member of the National Organization of Marriage, a political non-profit that works against the legalization of same-sex marriage, has been outspoken about his homophobic views for decades. In 1990, Card argued that “laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books … used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society’s regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.” In 2004, he wrote that equal marriage rights for gay people could “strike a death blow against the well-earned protected status of [my], and every other, real marriage” as well as American civilization itself.

In the same essay, Card asserts that “the dark secret of homosexual society — the one that dares not speak its name — is how many homosexuals first entered into that world through a disturbing seduction or rape or molestation or abuse.” This conflation of homosexuality with rape and sexual abuse would surface again later in 2011 after the republication of Card’s novella Hamlet’s Father, which recast the dead King in Shakespeare’s famous play as a gay pedophile who sexually abused Horatio, Laertes, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern when they were children. Several critics have asserted the book implies those characters become gay as a result of the abuse, although Card disputes that interpretation.

These beliefs align with Card’s larger, fiercely conservative worldview, which has inspired essays arguing that President Barack Obama was reelected last year because the media conspired to help him win a second term and that America’s public school system is “brainwashing” children through selective history lessons in order to create an army of Democratic Party voters – or as he calls them, the “Leftaliban.”

In response to Card’s involvement with the series, All Out, an international campaign for LGBT equality, has created an online petition calling for the writer’s removal from the title that has already surpassed its first target of 5,000 signatures and is now aiming for 10,000. This has, in turn, been characterized as “censorship” by others, with Kick-Ass creator Mark Millar going so far as to describe it as “fascistic,” suggesting issues with his understanding of the term. (Hint: A public petition asking a company to do something may not actually fall under the dictionary definition of fascism).

The issue has already inspired boycotts and parodies, bleeding from internet fandom into reports at mainstream news outlets like The Huffington Post, NPR, USA Today and The Guardian, which may help push DC into taking action. The publisher has recently been willing to reverse unpopular decisions based on fan reaction, after all.

When contacted for comment, DC Entertainment’s Courtney Simmons gave Wired the following statement: “As content creators we steadfastly support freedom of expression. However, the personal views of individuals associated with DC Comics are just that — personal views — and not those of the company itself.”

Adventures of Superman launches digitally in April, with a print edition following in May.

After all, doesn’t Superman stand against such bigotry?

There are conservatives out there that I enjoy reading but he's actively working to stop gays from getting married. If somebody was hypothetically working that hard to stop athiests from getting married maybe you could understand why it's a bigger deal for some people.

There are conservatives out there that I enjoy reading but he's actively working to stop gays from getting married. If somebody was hypothetically working that hard to stop athiests from getting married maybe you could understand why it's a bigger deal for some people.

Just like me with those who actively supported Romney. That however is different to me than somebody specifically working to limit my rights and freedoms.

You mean like all the liberal celebrities who oppose the Second Amendment?

...How long before married people answer the dictators thus: Regardless of law, marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down, so it can be replaced with a government that will respect and support marriage, and help me raise my children in a society where they will expect to marry in their turn.

How classy.

My point was to just try to give you some type of reference as to why some people are not so casual about Card's political activities. If somebody was actively trying to mess with your marriage I highly doubt you would be putting money in their pockets. I do reallize you don't care when it's gay people being married because it doesn't affect you personally but you should be capable of understanding why it's a big deal for gays and others with some empathy.

Biological imperatives trump laws. American government cannot fight against marriage and hope to endure. If the Constitution is defined in such a way as to destroy the privileged position of marriage, it is that insane Constitution, not marriage, that will die.

Moore called it a lovely thought.

deseretnews.com

I wonder if DC comics is aware that Card has threatened to destroy the government over gay marriage?

So Orson Scott Card's free-speech views, expressed somewhere outside the comics medium, are unacceptable... but fantasies about violently killing President George W. Bush, and spraying his bood and brains all over the walls of the Oval Office --while he was still a sitting president-- are perfectly fine?


Not to mention, comics stories that favorably endorse and promote the gay lifestyle are equally offensive to the rest of us, as Card's personal opinions of gays are to a few intolerant liberals. I would venture to guess that to most of the public, a story that promotes homosexuality is more offensive than a story that condemns homosexuality.


Score another one for the "tolerant" voice of liberalism.

They've released the first art from Card's Superman story:

...How long before married people answer the dictators thus: Regardless of law, marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down, so it can be replaced with a government that will respect and support marriage, and help me raise my children in a society where they will expect to marry in their turn.

once again my main point was that if somebody was working that hard to keep you from getting married I doubt you would be so casual about his politics.

Card channeling Ghandi? I don't think so WB.



Card's talk about destroying the government aside, once again my main point was that if somebody was working that hard to keep you from getting married I doubt you would be so casual about his politics. Just look at how you respond to just somebody saying they're not going to buy something.