Originally Posted By: Prometheus
 Originally Posted By: G-Man
It's a question of prosecutorial ethics.


Why do you think this is a Law School Blog Website? Common sense and actual ethical morality can always trump any lawyer technicality in the most basic and honest ways. It's simple: Ethical Morality is Truth, and Lawyers Lie. See?


You're again attacking G-man in a cowardly way --repeatedly-- when you know he has you on ignore and can't read what you say.


Beyond that, your view of events is that what you believe prejudicially out of liberal self-righteousness is "truth". Despite that the evidence contradicts your preconceived biases, and appears to justify Zimmerman's acquittal. Since the state fails to make a case beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman did not kill Trayvon Martin in self-defense.

And the simple statement of the facts --i.e., reality-- you distortedly spin as a "lawyer trick". Somehow in your deluded mind, any facts that exonerate Zimmerman --witnesses that say Martin was on top of Zimmerman, photos of Zimmerman's wounds that prove self-defense-- are an affront to "Ethical Morality" and "Truth". Whatever selective Orwellian definition of those terms you choose to espouse.

"Liberal clown" pretty well covers it.

  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.