RKMBs Forums .::Important::. Politics and Current Events Dominion Case Moves Forward, WB adds to "Deep State" list

Another Trump judge...another victory against Trump's allies trying to overthrow a legal election.

Surely, this man must be "deep state" or they have "kompromat." Right, Mentally Ill Boy?



https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...ove-forward-court-rules/?sh=4b12b8bf5d21

From Iggy’s link
“ Nichols ruled against those arguments, writing in his opinion that Dominion had sufficient grounds to argue Powell and Lindell made their fraud claims “knowing that they were false or with reckless disregard for the truth.”
The judge cast doubt on Powell and Lindell’s assertions they have evidence proving their voter fraud claims, noting Powell “faces an obvious hurdle” because she’s never actually produced a key piece of evidence she claims to have, and said “a reasonable juror could conclude” Lindell’s claims of a “vast international conspiracy that is ignored by the government but proven by a spreadsheet on an internet blog is so inherently improbable that only a reckless man would believe it.”

Seems like a golden opportunity for them to enter in their evidence and speak under oath, lol.

Add the Washington Times to the list of the "compromised." The slow backing away from Lindell is a beautiful sight to behold.

Enjoy the gulag, Komrade Wonder Boy!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/11/mike-lindells-lead-cyber-expert-says-they-cant-pro/

You're such a gloating partisan jerk, Iggy.




See how easy that is?

There was no victory in this, all the judge did was throw out Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Milke Lindell's push to dismiss the case before trial. The judge just said they couldn't pre-emptively dismiss the case, that it had to be determined in a trial by jury.

I find it suspect that the judge wouldn't move the trial out of Washington DC (an area that is aound 90% Democrat, and as proven in the Roger Stone case, has a high likelihood of having an overwhelmingly Democrat jury, or a unanimously Democrat jury) and it is very reasonable to move the venue to a region where the jury pool would be more 50/50 in ratio.

I don't know the political history of the judge, U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols, age 51, who was appointed by Trump in June 2018 . But many of his comments seem overly partisan, as if he is pre-judging the case, and any juror who read this article could be tainted by his remarks pre-judging the case.

The lawsuits filed by Dominion and Smartmatic against not only Giuliani, Powell and Lindell, but also filed in similar cases against FOX News, NEWSMAX, and OAN, as well as several prominent conservative anchors, is a clear bid to intimidate them away from reporting the truth about Dominion and Smartmatic's corrupt voting machines, and about the rabid Democrat partisanship of its employees, many openly BLM and Antifa members, who shut down their social media accounts and self-incriminating posts of their raabidly leftist views. Particularly Dominion vice president in charge of systems security Eric Coomer. Even if it can't be proven that Coomer said "Trump isn't going to win, I made fucking sure of that. Ha ha." , it can still be proven that he was rabidly and vitriolically a hyperpartisan leftist in his social media posts, and in control of the Dominion's election machines, and an enthusiastic supporter and member of Antifa. There is plenty of evidence of Dominion voter fraud, adjudication of votes (to change them for Biden), handing out sharpies, and complete control of election rigging in Maricopa County, Arizona, where the local election officials were completely reliant on Dominion employees to tally the vote, and had no access to passwords, keys, flash-drives and ballot scans to tally on election night, or in the later re-count!
Fox News is an 18 billion dollar company, is being sued for 3 billion. And the intent is to use lawsuits against these news agencies to intimidate and silence other news agencies, who don't want a similar lawsuit filed by Dominion against them as well.

Alison Durkee, writer of the Forbes article, is identified as a "New York based reporter who previously worked for VANITY FAIR", a magazine that for 5 years has been rabidly anti-Trump. Draw your own conclusions.

Yeah...keep coping, guy.

And other than the fact that these conservative news agencies and lawyers have been sued by Dominion and Smartmatic, how are their warnings about Dominion and Smartmatic any different than those by Senator Amy Klobuchar, Senator Elizabeth "Pocahontis" Warren, Senator Ron Wyden and others House and Senate Democrats, who warned of Dominion's lack of voting machine security back in 2019 in a very public statement made into the Senate record? Two of the three were Democrat presidential candidates in 2020, which certainly put them in the Democrt mainstream, and far from dismissable as "fringe".

How are these conservative news sources any different than CNN reporting on the hackability of Dominion machines in 2017?

Interesting how these Democrats and liberal media individuals and groups are not being sued by Dominion and Smartmatic, for making the exact same warnings and observations about Dominion's lack of safety and integrity.


https://www.westernjournal.com/reve...ter-warning-dominion-election-tech-2019/

https://www.wnd.com/2020/11/flashba...-warned-voting-machines-switching-votes/

https://www.oann.com/cnn-exposes-grave-threat-of-voting-fraud/

https://www.oann.com/new-york-times...out-potential-dangers-of-election-fraud/

https://www.oann.com/growing-number...ction-results-pushing-for-hand-recounts/

https://www.oann.com/senate-investi...s-major-discrepancies-deleted-databases/

https://www.oann.com/lawmakers-continue-investigation-into-extensive-evidence-of-widespread/

https://www.oann.com/deleted-files-...-refuses-to-hand-over-machine-passwords/

https://www.oann.com/mounting-votin...fusal-to-allow-audit-of-voting-machines/



It's OK, Iggy... I know it hurts... it's OK....

Keep coping. I'm not a Green Lantern or a Guardian of the Universe. OANN means shit to me.

Like I said, Democrat House and Senate members, and your beloved CNN, have made the same observations and calls for investigation about Dominion's lack of security and integrity.

But because they are not conservatives, for some reason they're not being sued.

If both sides are making the same warnings and allegations against Dominion, why is only one side being sued?
I can't imagine.

I would point out there is a difference in being concerned about hacks vs losers saying it definitely happened in an evil attempt to steal the election. Like I said before WB, I think the difference between us is it actually would matter to me if they had evidence that stood up in court. You will stick with the lie no matter what.

That was not even a literate sentence, and therefore didn't come even close to disputing what I said.

I said Democrats made virtually the exact same allegations about Dominion's voting machines being hackable and a danger to election integrity.
OAN showed the news footage from 2019, where CNN made THE. EXACT. SAME. ARGUMENT.
https://www.westernjournal.com/reve...ter-warning-dominion-election-tech-2019/
https://www.oann.com/cnn-exposes-grave-threat-of-voting-fraud/

But somehow when Republicans or conservative media make the same argument, they are "losers" to you.

Dominion is undeniably in bed with George Soros, the Democrats, and the far Left, including the Clinton Foundation, Antifa and Black Lives Matter. I feel like all Giuliani, Powell or Lindell's lawyers have to do is show that Dominion and Soros' front groups shared office space, and the social media posts of Dominion employees (that were so self-incriminating that they immediately scrubbed them off the internet the moment Dominion's election-rigging and Leftist connections hit the media.) Again, Eric Coomer the VP and director of Dominion systems security being the prime example, in his abundantly posted vitriolic hatred for Trump and Republicans. No one interested in election integrity would ever put a guy like this in charge of election security, let alone one who has so abundantly expressed his hatred for one side of the election ticket.

Wording like that is such an implicit admission to humping your MyPillows while watching Newsmax. Dude, no one feels that way about a fucking news channel, you mentally sick pervert.

Uhm no, Powell and Lindell were not making hypothetical arguments but straight out making claims it happened. You’re trying to make a false equivalence WB.

No, it's a statement of fact that CNN has dozens of times proven it's an unreliable partisan source. But you act like any conservative media source (OAN, Fox News, Newsmax, National Review, Daily Caller, Breitbart... ) is completely unreliable, and that in your view, only "mainstream" (liberal media sources) are "reliable", and any news source you disagree with is for you a source of contempt. Whereas in fact, it is the at least 80% liberal media, who even by a Harvard study was shown to be 93% rabidly anti-Trump, and during the Jan 2020 impeachment hearings reached 100% anti-THESE are the media you trust?!?
The conservative media you seem to despise reliably get the facts right, and report the facts the Orwellian Newspeak liberal media either distorts or selectively ignores.
I cited an hour's worth of examples from Attlkisson' s Hillsdale College lecture on the decline of journalistic standards and the rise of liberal-partisan zealotry.

Or MRC's citing statistics and polls of over 5 decades of liberal media bias:
https://www.mrc.org/media-bias-101

And Tim Groseclose (author of the book LEFT TURN, extensively documenting media bias), cited that of Washington-based reporters during the 2008 election self-identified as Obama supporters at a ratio of 93%, a higher percentage of Democrat allegiance than in the most densely liberal regions of the country in either Boston, Mssachusetts, or Berkely, California.
https://ricochet.com/88333/archives...lists-my-feud-with-eric-alterman-part-2/

And the first book I read on the subject, BIAS by Bernard Goldberg (an award-winning reporter, a self-identified liberal, who worked 30 years for CBS news, and for several years of that, an anchor for 60 Minutes. Certainly, a journalist very familiar with the industry.)

The sources I cited about the election fraud evidence, are sourced and linked. and unlike the partisan Bolsheviks you go to for your propaganda news, THESE sources I've sourced and linked have not repeatedly been caught getting the story completely wrong, to the point they've had to fire reporters and producers, as have CNN, New York Times, Washington Post and others you hold up as if they were the gold standard.
Clearly they have a bias, clearly they have OPENLY ADMITTED their bias, BRAGGED about their bias, and stated it to be their holy mission to defend Biden and the Democrats at any cost, and to destroy Trump.
The ACTUAL journalists I've cited, such as Sharyl Attkisson, Lara Logan, Ron Kessler, John Solomon, Glenn Greenwald and others, have cited what actual journalistic standards are and have been for decades, that their fanatical Ministry of Truth colleagues have abandoned.

A fanatical abandonment of journalistic standards you obviously share. You don't cite facts or logic, every last one of your posts is just more of your infantile "Nyah nyah nyah, you're a poopy-face" garbage.

Lindell is not a journalist. But he has given airtime to a number of cyber-security experts, professional corporate crime investigators, military offiecers trained in psy-ops amd cyber-warfare, and hundreds of election officials and volunteers who made sworn affidavits to what they saw on Nov 3rd, mathematicians and statisticians on the impossibility of what occurred, and the self-incriminating posts and actions of Dominion's own employees.
Whatever Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell might have gotten wrong, or just not been able to prove, is a tiny footnote. The overwhelming thrust of the case they've made is plain as day.

The Dominion and Smartmatic billion-dollar lawsuits against Sydney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Mike Lindell, and conservative news outlets are just intimidation. Dominion lost business as a result of that coverage? Good ! They deserve to lose business.
Giuliani and Powell and Lindell may not be able to prove Colonel Mustard did it with a candlestick holder in the study, metaphorically speaking, where Dominion is concerned, but they have certainly presented a strong case in circumstantial evidence, abundant social-media-posted motive by virtually every Dominion employee, and some very slimy ties to George Soros and his front groups (with whom Dominion shared an office suite!) , Dominion employees' social-media-posted partisanship to the Democrat Party, to Antifa, to BLM, to the Clinton Foundation, and far more.

Only a Democrat-partisan jury (as absurdly on display in the Roger Stone case, with a Democrat-zealot jury forewoman, and a partisan Democrat judge as the cherry on top, in a Washington DC court district that is over 90% Democrat, a jury pool over 90% Democrat) would convict Powell, Giuliani or Lindell of defamation against Dominion.

A Trump appointed judge just pushed the case forward and, in the time since, Lindell responded by...

1. Quickly leaving the stage shortly after the news broke.

2. Had his own data guy refute his claims that China hacked the servers and oddly rescind, rather than claim for himself, the five million dollars that Lindell put up to prove his data was wrong.

3. Claimed he was attacked at his hotel by Antifa despite no police reports and, seemingly, no hotel video to confirm. The scuffle was so bad he showed up to day three without a scratch.

4. Claimed a Gateway Pundit writer is a CIA plant.

5. Said some Pariah level dumbassery about being saved from having his head cut off in Mexico by God.

6. And, said who did it (how do you put, Wondy? VOTER FRAUD!!!) doesn't even matter anymore.

But, yeah, you're the sane one that supports this dude and I'm supposed to treat your ideas as real possibilities. Okay, you delusional and fucking mentally ill moron.

Won't let me delete, but double posted because--holy fuck--the Lindell meltdown today has been hilarious.

Here is the clip in all its mentally broken glory...

https://twitter.com/z3dster/status/1425831724248936448

Big frigging deal. He just meant to say "When I was in Mexico, some guys attacked me and threatened to cut my head off, God saved and protected me."

I fail to see what you're so orgasmic about, no revelation of anything. I see pretty much every day in the news when Democrats or Republicans are interviewed and they leave out a few words in some clumsy syntax, but you know what they're saying anyway.
Apparently you're so desperate in your partisanship for some kind of major error by Lindell that you want to make that into something it's not. Big frigging deal.
The incident in Mexico I've heard him talk about before, 15 or 20 years ago when he was he was still a crack addict, traveling to Mexico and involved with drug traffickers his lifestyle got him in contanct with. You seem to be under the misperception that this is a recent event, where he was saying Dominion ninja assassins were sent to kill him or somesuch. Again, Lindell is not the most eloquent speaker, but he's an optimistic guy, whose life is an exaample of how you can go down the wrong path with drugs, and then come out of it, build a business empire, accumulate a large personal fortune, and through his donations and drug rehab programs, help improve the lives of a lot of other people.


I watched about an hour of Lindell's symposium today. Lindell and his guest speakers were clearly saying that Dominion hired people who were former election officials, who were then in charge of running election machines in a clear conflict of interest, and other corrupt actions. Lindell and his guest speakers clearly said over and over that Dominion rigged the votes, and how they rigged the votes.
There was a section about how the computer code for at least some Dominion voter machines was oddly written in Chinese and Croatian. As further proof of foreign hacking and Chinese financing of Dominion voting machines, and Chinese influence over the software programmed into the Dominion machines, the hard-drive put in the machines, and remote-access internet-ready chips in the machines that Dominion alleged their machines were not equipped with. But they undeniably were.

My general opinion of the "Symposium" is that while it has some information, it's very drawn out and padded, and you have to listen to a lot of segments that meander or go nowhere, to get to the parts (like say, with Colonel Phil Waldron) that give a lot of details.
I would prefer if, instead of 12 hours a day for 3 days, that pretty much no one can watch unless they're retired and home with their cats all day, if it were instead maybe 6 hours a day of very organized information, that they could repeat in primetime each day for another 6 hours. When people could in either one 6 hour period, or the repeating 6 hours, actually be able to watch it. I hope that the entire thing is video-posted online, on Vimeo, or Bitchute, or Rumble, or one of those (certainly George Orwell's Youtube would delete it immediately, as would Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat or many other Democrat/Left-aligned online platforms). And of course, video-posted on Lindell's own site. Where you could watch bits and pieces of it at your leisure and digest it, when you actually have time.

And while there is information in Lindell's programs, I wish that he would maybe just introduce guests and not do all the interviews himself, but instead hire a professional journalist, who would do a better job, be less rambling, and have less crosstalk, more focused on presenting hard facts and statistical information.
I also felt the 3-day show would have been better served with an advance schedule guide to the guest speakers, so if you can't watch the whole thing, as few can, you could at least know in advance the parts you want to make time for.
With the number of specials Lindell has done at this point, I just feel his special programs should be more smoothly produced and targeted in their presentation of the facts at this point. But I'm grateful Lindell is presenting these facts and guests at all, as no one else is attempting, except for OAN, and to a lesser degree, Newsmax. Fox News (at this point with anti-Trump management, and restraining even their pro-Trump stars from discussing it on air) is ignoring Lindell's symposium.

I don't see any sign that Lindell today (or any day) is rattled, backpedalling, or pulling his punches as a result of the judge going forward with a trial.
And as I already said, Iggy, you're gloating about the judge not throwing out the case in advance as some kind of great "win" against Lindell, Powell and Giuliani. No, the judge just didn't dismiss the case, and ruled for both sides to have their day (or weeks) in court. Again: big frigging deal.

As I also said previously, the judge (appointed by Trump in 2018) by going forward with the trial, might just be showing he doesn't have a bias toward protecting Trump supporters. But interesting how many other judges in Nov and Dec 2020 didn't give the evidence of election fraud the same opportunity to be heard in court.

Yes, Alex, what is "I'm not reading all of that because I expect it is why no one takes your mentally broken ass seriously?"

Yeah, I know... you've got nothin'.

Trump lawyers just were recently sanctioned for they’re actions/lies btw.

Specifically what?

The Democrat/Left is always accusing or filing lawsuits against Republicans, as part of their propaganda war. That doesn't mean there is actually any substance to what they allege.

.