Obama didn't produce the intel but was briefed on it. You believe the guy who brags about being able to sexually assault women and obvious lies about crowd sizes. You don't have to tell me who you believe
Obama has a circle of yes-men who do whatever he says. As president, he would sack generals who gave him advice (to increase military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan) that he didn't want to hear. If given advice he didn't want, Obama would fire these generals. The yes-men who pushed for that "complete garbage" (again, Pulitzer winning journalist Bob Woodward) report to be given to Trump were those Politburo intelligence appointees Obama left behind.
And again, Trump's recorded bus comments from 10 years ago, boasting about sexual exploits with women who eagerly gave themselves to him because he was famous,
pales beside the ACTUAL and MULTIPLE sexual assaults of Bill Clinton.
Is having sexual relations with his 23 year old intern Monica Lewinsky more presidential?
Was violating Lewinsky with a cigar more presidential?
Was Hillary Clinton leading the charge to destroy Bill Clinton's female accusers, women she destroyed
even though she KNEW they were telling the truth about Bill Clinton?
Was renting out the Lincoln bedroom more presidential?
Pedophile island.
Whitewater.
Pay-to-play between donations to the Clinton Foundation buying influence in Hillary Clinton's State Department.
Hillary's private server allowing national security to be hacked EVERY DAY of the four years Frau Hitlery was secretary of state.
You obsess over the grain of sand that implies Trump guilty of something, while giving a free pass to the MOUNTAIN that proves the Clintons guilty beyond all doubt.
Again: If Trump were guilty of all
alleged about him, it would still pale before what Bill Clinton is PROVEN guilty of. And Hillary as well.
