You may have noticed that most of the Obama years were over 1,700,000. That is not a 180 degree turn as you try to spin it. As pointed out at the beginning of this thread there wasn't a Trump bump. He inherited a growing economy like Bush did with Clinton. The only 180 degree turn is your reaction to the stock market now that it isn't a democrat in power.
Are you hallucinating?
As I just said above, the economy was declining in the last year of Bill Clinton, and almost the day George W. Bush was inaugurated, stats were released that the nation had its third consecutive quarter of negative economic growth, meeting the official criteria for a recession. Since Bush was in office for days, and not for 3 quarters, he cannot be blamed for the RECESSION HE INHERITED.
As I also laid out regarding Trump, his policy IS a 180-degree turn from Obama's statist, big government, anti-capitalist policy. Polar opposite Obama, with Trump cutting regulation and lowering taxes, encouraging businesses to bring factories and jobs back to the United States. That is certainly NOT a continuation of what Obama was doing.
And like Reagan in 1981-1982, it will take a while to see the full benefit of Trump's 180-degree turn of the economic ship. Even so, we are already seeing 3.3% growth, and there was never one year of Obama's 8 years that the economy reached 3%. Trump has already done that, EVEN WITH the destruction to the economy caused by 5 devastating hurricanes to the U.S. in the tens of billions each. If not for that, Trump's policy would have already reached 4% annual growth.
Obama's policy created false "growth" by creating $10 trillion in new federal debt over his 8 year term, more than all previous presidents combined. And printing over 3 trillion in new currency (there was only 800 billion in printed currency when Obama took office), more than quadrupling the money supply. It was a smoke and mirrors presidency.
But if you're an
Alinsky-trained cultural Marxist revolutionary, that kind of policy that sets up the U.S. for self-destruction that kills jobs and makes tens of millions more dependent on the federal government (and therefore perfect statist Democrat voters) makes perfect sense. Likewise Hillary Clinton, another Alinsky-trained cultural Marxist revolutionary.
Deception is at the core of planning for these and other Democrats. Obamacare, for example, was designed to fail, to collapse. And coincidentally, to collapse in 2017. Hillary Clinton was supposed to win in Nov 2016, and she would have then bailed out the planned healthcare collapse and declared socialized medicine (i.e., "single payer") to replace it. Not because it accidentally failed, but precisely because it was designed to fail from the very outset.
Likewise "fast and furious", designed by Democrats to smear gun retailers and justify a crackdown on gun retailers, but the true facts were exposed and blew up in their face. Another Democrat deception.
The names Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, and Donna Brazille are all likewise self-explanatory examples of Democrat deception, in the scandals synonymous with their names and Wikipedia listings.
Likewise Al Franken.
Chuck Schumer.
Harry Reid.
Nancy Pelosi.
Dick Durbin.
>>>ALL<<<< the Democrat leadership!
Aided and abetted by anti-American puppetmasters like George Soros and new Washington Post owner/billionaire Jeff Bezos. These Democrats and their benefactors are globalists and cultural Marxists whose shared goals are destruction of U.S. sovereignty, and absorption of the U.S. into the global system, and a contempt for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law in achieving those ends.
