What everyone knows is that there was more than enough evidence to do a similar raid of Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, and DOJ/FBI did NOT.
Further the FBI and DOJ just sat on their hands while Hillary Clinton and her subordinates deleted 33,000 self-incriminating e-mails, and bleachbitted the hard-drives of their computers, and smashed all Frau Hitlery's cel phones to eliminate the incriminating messages and email on those. All >>>>AFTER<<<< they were subpoenaed as evidence. The FBI even gave them permission to destroy much of the remaining evidence. Some cel phones were turned over with the SIM cards (i.e., the memory cards) removed, rendered useless as evidence. These people destroyed evidence, and yet no aggressive raids by DOJ and FBI.
The FBI and DOJ also gave Mills and Abedin immunity, in exchange for exactly no information.
Contrast that destruction of overwhelming evidence and clear crimes (selling State Department influence in exchange for hundreds of millions in foreign donations to the Clinton foundation, for openers), to the piddly offenses DOJ and FBI are raiding Trump on with what legal scholar Alan Deshowitz describes as "extreme aggression". Was there really any evidence that Cohen would have destroyed evidence he never had a clue DOJ and FBI would aggressively raid?
