You also snuck this one by me...
Nope, you just gave Hannity a free pass. You can make all the accusations you want but those would be off topic and sad partisan deflection. Hannity is also very biased so if you don't accept fact checks I'm sure as heck not accepting Hannity crap.
But...
As Hannity tells it, there is no actual business relationship. It sounds to me like he just informally asked Cohen's opinion over cocktails or dinner, and that Hannity entrusted the actual transactions to other lawyers that he actually paid.
Since Cohen said that Hannity is his client, it's legitimate to clarify what Hannity's relationship is with Cohen. But pending any facts to the contrary, Hannity has answered those questions, and he doesn't have business ties to Cohen.
WHAT ABOUT THE LAUNDRY LIST OF REPORTERS HANNITY CITED WITH FAR MORE EXTENSIVE UNDISCLOSED POLITICAL TIES?!?
A long list of undisclosed incestuous relationships by CNN reporters and executives?
Who donated 96% for Hillary Clinton?
With extensive ties to the Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton administrations and staff?
You once again hold Republicans to a >>>>FAR<<<<< higher standard than the thieving Cultural Marxist America-hating bastards you align yourself with.
You lyingly allege I gave Hannity a free pass. I clearly didn't. I said that it was legitimate to ask about Cohen's relationship. But Hannity answered and there is no legal relationship. So unless there's some evidence otherwise, Hannity has nothing more to answer for.
As opposed to the mountains of evidence against Hillary Clinton and the evil minions among her staff, and in the DOJ and FBI.
