This latest round of accusations involve more than four women. There are now a number of witnesses from his college days alleging behavior that should have made him ineligible for a lifetime appointment on the SC if true.
The key words there:
if true.
Slanderous wild accusations, completely unsubstantiated. See what I linked above, about penises in faces and "harmless fun", from the New York Times, no less!
These are not serious allegations with anyone willing to go on the record against Kavanaugh. It's a pseudo-credible smear. Even less credible than the
proven lies of the four women who accused him a year ago.
The best revenge Kavanaugh can have is to, like Clarence Thomas before him, stay on the Supreme Court for 40 years. Thomas was even better, because he is a decisive hardline conservative.
You should be pleased with Kavanaugh, since he is a rule-of-law guy, who rules overwhelmingly in favor of the law, even when the law doesn't support his own conservative beliefs. Even the liberal clerks who served under Kavanaugh praise his nonpartisanship and respect for the rule of law.
As opposed judges like Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, whose ideological biases take a high priority for them above the rule of law. For example, Ginsberg when she participated in a ruling that advanced gay marriage nationally, was later revealed to have conducted a gay marriage herself within weeks of the ruling. With her bias, she should have recused herself from that decision. But she's a social justice warrior, which has a higher priority for her than being a neutral judge.
