Originally Posted By: from the "factcheck"

In addition, the intelligence community's inspector general, Michael Atkinson, deemed the complaint an "urgent concern" that he was required by law to provide to the congressional intelligence committees. But [acting Director of Nationa Intelligence Joseph] Maguire refused to do so on the advice of the Justice Department, resulting in a standoff with Congress that ultimately resulted in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi backing a formal impeachment inquiry against Trump.


That lyingly glosses over quite a bit. DNI Maguire, having never received a "whistleblower" report anything like this one, consulted lawyers of the Justice Department to decide from an informed legal perspective how to handle the report. Together, Maguire and DOJ, while investigating the report themselves, ultimately decided that there was not enough substance or confirmed information beyond hearsay to submit the report to the Congressional committee.

This unprecedented "whistleblower report" is in truth a White House leak hiding behind a mask of pseudo-legitimacy. It is yet another attack on the president, and just the latest half-baked excuse to pursue a presidential impeachment that House Democrat radicals have been itching for since before Trump was even inaugurated in early 2017.

AGAIN:
1) Who is Trump's "whistleblower" accuser?
2) What EXACTLY is Trump accused of doing?
3) What corroborating evidence is there of the unknown allegation Trump is accused of?

This is so clearly a set-up, and the Democrats are trying to rush this presidential coup along before the public realizes they've been bamboozled by the Democrats and the Deep State. AGAIN .

But it's too late. The public already knows what the Democrats are up to.


Nothing in the NBC News article explains 1) why the form was recently changed sometime in the last year, and why no one knows precisely when or who or why the form was changed, just in time to launch this attack on Trump with the new report form, 2) who within the CIA approved the changes, although it seems to have been approved at least partly by CIA director Gina Haspel herself, and 3) how Gina Haspel has ties with John Brennan, one of Trump's most vociferous critics, and is widely believed to be the architect of the Russia Hoax himself, 4) that several of Haspel's closest assistants are from Brennan's staff, one of whom came out of retirement to serve as Gina Haspel's assistant, 5) that Haspel was assigned to London with the CIA directly by Brennan in 2016, and that coincides with when Peter Strzok was in London assembling the Russia Dossier with Christopher Steele to falsely incriminate Trump.

It gives off an overpowering stench of Deep State anti-Trump corruption and conspiracy. There is no legitimacy whatsoever to this coup attempt.

  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.