Uhm somebody from the party of Trump has very little credibility talking about character. Charity fraud, birtherism, massive amounts of adultery, lies and corruption are your values now.
That's quite a cluster of Democrat propaganda to deconstruct.
[quote=M E M]quote=Matter-eater Man]Uhm somebody from the party of Trump has very little credibility talking about character. Charity fraud, birtherism, massive amounts of adultery, lies and corruption are your values now.
Most of that would describe the Clintons, the Kennedy family, or quite a few others in the Democrat party. Assuming all you allege about Trump is true, one can make mistakes and redeem themselves and be a better person going forward.
At the very least, Trump is not a treasonous America-hating cultural marxist radical who wants to "radically transform" America, who sees the Constitution as a "transitional document" that can be altered in pursuit of a socialist utopia to replace it. At least Trump is not a radical like the Democrat sackss of shit (which by the way includes every 2020 candidate who all raised their hand on a debate stage in support of these things:
open borders, to de-criminalize illegal immigrants, to GIVE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED HEALTHCARE to illegal immigrants, to allow convicted felons to vote from their jail cells, gun confiscation, de-criminalizing every single narcotic drug, the party of homelessness, the party of people pooping and shooting drugs in the street, the party of weaponizing federal agencies against their opponents. Yours is the party of Jim Crow, segregation, the Ku Klux Klan, and now the party of identity politics, polarization and race hustling, of de-Christianizing America, and late-term abortions.
And you have the audacity to talk about immorality?!?
Rush Limbaugh’s are your heroes and the Roger Stone’s are the ones that you see as victims.
Rush Limbaugh has committed no crime or dishonor. I still recall in 1994 when Ronald Reagan sent a letter to Rush Limbaugh, telling Limbaugh that he had led the country as far as he could, and that he saw Limbaugh as the new spiritual leader of the Republican party. What a deep honor Limbaugh must have felt in that moment.
In addition to politics, Limbaugh is an industry innnovator who many others have acknowledged personally saved A.M. radio. And there created a platform for conservative thought that avenues like print news and broadcast television had been used to lock out conservative thought.
Limbaugh has nothing to apologize for.
Roger Stone, for all his flamboyance and bombast, is an author and political advisor for decades. The crimes alleged against him (like against Michael Flynn, George Papadaapoulos, Paul Manafort, and other still being persecuted by a Democrat-weaponized DOJ and FBI) are
process crimes that otherwise never would have been prosecuted. Shakedowns by FBI/DOJ that they were forced to confess to under duress, process crimes,
not ACTUAL crimes. Stone was bankrupted by litigation and then unable to further afford legsl defense forced to confess to lying, regarding an alleged crime by Trump that the Mueller special investigation team of 17 Trump-hating lawyers finally had to confess had no supporting evidence. So Stone was forced to confess to purjury about a crime that didn't happen.
Obama winning the popular vote along with the electoral was “razor thin” compared to Trump’s huge electoral college won that didn’t include the popular vote. We are now in the largest economic expansion in history. Most of it occurred under Obama.
Whether you like it or not, those are the rules of U.S. presidential elections, and Trump won by a landslide in electoral college votes. I
LOVE how the assholes of the Democrat/Left went on and on about how Trump couldn't win electorally, the "blue wall" and all that crap, on and on for months about how there was no way Trump could win the electoral college.
Then election night, Trump
won the electoral college, fair and square, by a landslide. And now all the assholes of the Democrat/Left can talk about is how Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.
Let me give you a review of why the electoral college exists: It exists to give proportional representation to all 50 states, so that a candidate can't just campaign in a few population centers like New York and Illinois and California and Texas to lock up the vote while ignoring the rest of the country.
The electoral college also assures that if there is corruption and millions of illegal votes in, say, California, where illegal immigrants can get a drivers license, and by cheecking a box with no verification tht they're not a citizen,
can illegally vote. Millions of illegals.
Catherine Englebrecht and her organization studied illegal voting in just 28 of the 50 states and found 7 million illegal votes. Hillary Clinton's "popular vote victory" of 2.8 million votes could be achieved just in the corrupt state of California. Just the kind of state election corruption the electoral college was designed to prevent.
