I agree that the Israel comments were calculated. Romney wants some of those Jewish votes and would say about anything to get them. When you start talking about one group being more culturally superior than another and the hand of providence playing a part, that doesn't strike me as good statemanship.
And by "say about anything", you mean Romney would actually stand by Israel. As Opposed to Obama, who made empty assurances, stabbed Israel repeatedly in the back, and has overseen the worst relations with Israel the U.S. has ever had.
Romney, on the other hand, would restore strong solidarity with Israel. And that solidarity alone would deter war in the Middle East, that Obama's distance from Israel has encouraged. Just as he has distanced Britain, just as he has distanced Poland, just as he has distanced Czech Republic. To a level that manifestss anti-Americanism, if not outright treason, in Obama's actions, that Obama's intent is to weaken the ability of the U.S. and Europe to project global power.
Likewise Obama's funds to U.S. and Mexican state-owned oil companies, while banning offshore drilling and permits to U.S. private oil companies on public land.
Likewise the reductions in our nuclear arsenal and conventional forces to unprecedentedly low levels, that many in the Pentagon and Joint Chiefs and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta have said are dangerous reductions.
Likewise Obama's push for open borders and amnesty for illegal immigrants. Even
suing Arizona for trying to defend its state borders that his Obama's federal government will not.
Likewise Obama's apologies and reversals of U.S. foreign policy worldwide.
And especially, likewise Obama heaping up almost 6 trillion in new debt, that threatens to collapse the dollar and our economy. That the chairman of the Joint Chiefs called the greatest current threat to our national security. Because our military cannot defend the nation if our economy implodes.
AGAIN: This is not by accident. This is Cloward and Piven strategy, Saul Alinsky, SEIU, William Ayers, and all the other radicals whose ideology Obama is deeply marinated in. Not just something from Obama's past 20 years ago, but clearly seen in what Obama and his appointed White House subordinates have said repeatedly, in recorded public statements and speeches.
Obama has clearly lied repeatedly to any number of voters: Jews, blacks, hispanics, oil and coal industry workers, and his vow to "find the middle" and not splinter the nation further along race and class lines.
Republicans, whether Ronald Reagan or the 1994 "Contract With America" mean what they say and follow up on the promises they campaigned on when elected.
Whereas the Democrats campaign as one thing, and then pursue a very different far-Left agenda when in office. Democrats, by nature of their agenda, rely on deceit and false promises to gain the position to advance their true agenda.
And to cover their tracks, Democrats slander their opposition to divert attention away from their own lies and deceit.
