Eh,it's no better/worse than when Obama made his recorded comments at a fundraiser about people that cling to their guns and religion. These are comments that are made to those that share the same opinion/view as the person speaking. No more,no less in my opinion. Much ado about nothing.
That is a good point. However, whereas the media did their level best to cover up the Obama remarks, they're pulling an all out offensive against Romney.
They've completely dropped all pretext of being anything but appendages of the DNC.
That.
Romney said nothing that isn't obviously true.
A vast percentage of the population is addicted to liberal entitlements that the Democrats are championing and expanding to create a permanent Democrat majority.
And Romney rightly said that these people won't vote for Romney or the Republicans no matter what he proposes.
Romney rightly said that he will go for every vote he can get, but realistically will focus on moderates and independents that have a greater likelihood of being won to Romney's side and voting for him.
Romney also said that we are on the path to becoming Greece (i.e., riots, a collapsed currency, and junk-bond credit status; the difference being that, unlike Greece, no one will be able to bail us out). Our economy and dollar will implode, unless new leadership changes economic course from the orgy of deficit spending and printing of money that Obama has pursued.
To emphasize the point, (1) Bernanke announced QE-3, printing about 400 billion more over the next year, that will further de-value the dollar, and (2) the world's credit agencies downgraded the U.S. federal credit rating.
AGAIN.And while our embassies burn worldwide and the reforms in muslim countries Obama pushed collapse, the mainstream media ignores these failures, and the above mentioned collapsing economy, to focus on Mitt Romney's "tone", and y'know, the color of his shoes, and the utter failure and stupidity of his...
being right!The liberal media rails on Romney for appearing on Neil Cavuto's show, who "softpedaled" on Romney by asking him direct questions about his remarks.
While Obama gets praised by the same media for going on David Letterman and getting asked
really tough questions about how good he looks, and how much he weighs ("about 180 pounds"), deep, penetrating questions about Obama's global failures in the Arab world, and the fact that he's still blaming it on "spontaneous rioting that just got out of hand", instead of what every other government worldwide (including the Libyan president) calls an
organized terrorist attack. Well, maybe next time.
Obama's too busy right now.
Meeting with David Letterman right now, while Obama's distance from Israel on the Iranian nuclear crisis moves us toward World War 3.
And with Beyonce.
And with Jay Z.
No time for a meeting with Netanyahu, though.
Which do you think is more important? And the reaction from the media toward Obama's obliviousness toward multiple national and global threats? Complete silence. Nothing. Just fawning like schoolgirls over Obama's appearance on Letterman. While the media strains to make every attack possible on Romney.
It's unbelievable, the bias, the double-standard, the outrageous level of cover the mainstream media is flying for Obama.
