A look at one muslim zone in the U.S., "Islamburg", located outside Binghaamton, NY.
In another report by Hannity last night, Robert Spencer said in addition to "no-go" muslim zones across France, Sweden, Holland and other European nations, there are about 35 in the U.S.! In Michigan, New York, and other states with high levels of new muslim immigrants.
There's estimated to be about 3 million muslims in the U.S. (much lower than Europe) and about 100,000 new muslim immigrants to the U.S. every year. A bit like letting in massive immigration from Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in the midst of World War II. Or like adding an entire new muslim town to the U.S. every year.
All these rallies with people saying, "I am Charlie" are so fucking stupid. And all the news outlets are calling this an example of "standing up" to the terror and "extremists".
I'm reminded of the protests in Iran where hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets said they weren't going to take it anymore. Then suddenly, it fizzled because they were unwilling to do anything beyond that. All "Kiss Kiss", but no "Bang Bang". Another culture clearly the victim of western peacenik assholes who claim that violence is unnecessary to facilitate improvement. OF COURSE France--one of the countries from which that mindset originates--is going follow the same cycle as Iran.
Yes, exactly. All for the cameras, with no substantial real opposition. It somehow reminds me of State Department official Jen Psaki, hash-tag tweeting her protests to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Guns and ammunition might make the point more strongly.
Quote:
=Pariah] I have no doubt that the French National Front will build more steam, but people are going to eventually lose their sense of urgency here all the same.
What makes it worse is that Hamas and Hezbollah apparently has the more liberal commentators fooled--no difficult task there--after speaking out against the attack. Every time I hear the phrase, "Once you've lost [BLANK], you've definitely lost the [BLANK]," my eyes roll of their own volition. I'm sure there's a name for that kind of argument, I just don't know what it is.
Recycling the "actions of the few" and "no true Muslim" tunes is a textbook KGB disinformation tactic designed to divide your enemies.
A coalition of the media, the far-Left, and aggrieved minorities, stoking white guilt for alleged atrocities of the past, to undermine nationalism and belief in capitalist Western culture, undermining it, indoctrinating a shame in our culture so it will be undefended by the new generation, and undefended will be replaced by the new (at least temporary) socialist order.
Muslims are not communists, but they serve their purpose as an ally in the revolution stage.
Does it really surprise you at this point when the media sides with the enemy?
All these rallies with people saying, "I am Charlie" are so fucking stupid. And all the news outlets are calling this an example of "standing up" to the terror and "extremists".
I'm reminded of the protests in Iran where hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets said they weren't going to take it anymore. Then suddenly, it fizzled because they were unwilling to do anything beyond that. All "Kiss Kiss", but no "Bang Bang". Another culture clearly the victim of western peacenik assholes who claim that violence is unnecessary to facilitate improvement. OF COURSE France--one of the countries from which that mindset originates--is going follow the same cycle as Iran.
Yes, exactly. All for the cameras, with no substantial real opposition.
How is this different than, say, the solidarity protests?
Say what you will about the cheese eating surrender monkeys but at least they are out and protesting. The US would be on the second leg of its open air apology tour at this point and trying to find a way to combat "workplace violence."
And speaking of apology tours....
America snubs historic Paris rally: President Barack Obama and other top members of his administration have snubbed a historic rally in Paris today that brought together more than 40 world leaders from Europe, Africa, the Middle East and even Russia.
I guess the golf courses in France aren't up to his excellency's exacting standards.
Oh my, I guess FOX is now part of the conspiracy...
Quote:
Erik Wemple Fox News corrects, apologizes for ‘no-go zone’ remarks By Erik Wemple January 18 at 11:56 AM
If Fox News anchors hadn’t gotten the message before, they will now: The network isn’t going to sanction loose and utterly unsupported chatter about Muslim “no-go zones” in Europe. In its programming last night, Fox News issued two corrections on the matter, one of which acknowledged that “we have made some regrettable errors on air regarding the Muslim population in Europe, particularly with regard to England and France.” That came from Julie Banderas during the Saturday night program “Fox Report.”
She continued: “To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country and no credible information to support the assertion there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion.”
Later in the evening, Jeanine Pirro, host of “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” presented her own correction for the centerpiece of Fox News’s “no-go zone” week. On her Jan. 10 program, Pirro welcomed terrorism analyst Steve Emerson to speak about these zones, which Emerson described this way: “They’re sort of amorphous, they’re not contiguous necessarily, but they’re sort of safe havens. And they’re places where the governments, like France, Britain, Sweden, Germany — they don’t exercise any sovereignty so you basically have zones where Sharia courts are set up, where Muslim density is very intense, where police don’t go in.” Though Emerson claimed that this phenomenon plagued Europe very broadly, he zeroed in on Birmingham, England: “There are actual cities like Birmingham that are totally Muslim, where non-Muslims just simply don’t go in,” he said. (A separate no-go-zone correction was issued by”Fox & Friends” on Saturday morning.)
In her correction, Pirro laid responsibility for the bad information on Emerson, and on her failure to correct him: “Last week on this program,” said Pirro, “a guest made a serious factual error that we wrongly let stand unchallenged and uncorrected. The guest asserted that the city of Birmingham, England, is totally Muslim and that it is a place where non-Muslims don’t go . Both are incorrect.” She went on to provide 2011 census data noting that 22 percent of the city’s population self-identifies as Muslim and that there’s no evidence of the whole no-go thing.
Not bad, though a review of the offending segment reveals that Pirro’s errors extend beyond just the failure to challenge Emerson. She gave the impression that she was rooting for these falsehoods. “This is metastasizing into a simple takeover,” she said at one point of the Muslim presence in Europe.
The Emerson-Pirro exchange mushroomed into a big problem for Fox News. Not only did the usual media-watchdog suspects hammer the network for trading in nonsense, the British prime minister did as well. “When I heard this, frankly, I choked on my porridge and I thought it must be April Fools’ Day,” said David Cameron, who finished with this rip against Emerson: “This guy’s clearly a complete idiot.” ...
No worries though, it's viewers want to believe otherwise and I'm sure Hannity and others on FOX will stick to delivering the news that it's viewers desire, truth be damned.
though a review of the offending segment reveals that Pirro’s errors extend beyond just the failure to challenge Emerson. She gave the impression that she was rooting for these falsehoods. “This is metastasizing into a simple takeover,” she said at one point of the Muslim presence in Europe.
I notice this Erik Wemple hit piece on Fox only mentioned the error on Judge Jeannine Pirro's show, but still used it as a blanket to smear all of Fox News. To my knowledge it was one guest, making one error. And Pirro responding to what she trusted her guest to be telling her as fact. As cited in the Hannity clip I posted above several days ago, as told to Hannity by a different guest, there are 752 of these "no-go" zones in France, and in Sweden, England and other European countries. It was overstated by one guest about one city in England, but the "no-go" zones clearly exist. Autonomous muslim regions where the French police and fire departments don't go into, where muslim communities provide their own.
Certainly the non-assimilation of muslims, the muslim hostility toward the European nations they live in, the desire to establish Sharia law in all these nations, and the Islamic terrorism in Europe and worldwide, are undeniably real.
Let's be honest, the mainstream media is overwhelmingly liberal, and generally despise Fox News for its airing of a dissenting conservative perspective, even though they present both sides in a "fair and blalanced" debate. And no doubt Wemple lives for the opportunity to whale on Fox when they make an error (as all news agencies inevitably do at one time or another, and offer corrections). And jump on Fox News in a way that they wouldn't if a liberal/mainstream network made a similar mistake.
Compare, for example, the selective omission of the other networks who didn't even mention Obama's absence from the Paris rally of virtually all world leaders. Neither Obama, Biden, Kerry, or even Eric Holder (who happened to be in Paris and right across the street and still didn't attend!) Even when Obama's White House press secretary Josh Earnest a day later was questioned by Fox White House correspondent Ed Henry and Earnest unprecedentedly for Obama's White House, admitted that the administration made an error, the mainstream media STILL didn't cover it, or acknowledge that there was international criticism of Obama for not attending. Or acknowledge their own error in not reporting it (as Fox News DID!)
The other networks also vastly under-reported Republican sweep of the table in the Nov 2014 elections. Somehow when Republicans win the (overwhelmingly liberal) news media has no interest in reporting it. Again a case where to know the facts, one would have to turn to Fox News, to see what was selectively omitted by the entire rest of the mainstream media.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
No worries though, it's viewers want to believe otherwise and I'm sure Hannity and others on FOX will stick to delivering the news that it's viewers desire, truth be damned.
Do you honestly believe that these no-go zones are some kind of fantastical myth?
Just because European governments don't acknowledge the militancy of their Muslim ghettos in an official capacity doesn't mean they aren't as described.
If you're really that stupidly ignorant though, you should try walking with your boyfriend down one of those streets if ever you get a chance to go to Europe. See what happens.
With Obama's State of the Union dominating the news, I forgot to post one of the oddest diplomatic moves in U.S. history.
When Obama failed to show up with other world leaders, and neither Comrade Obama, V.P. Biden, Secretary of State Kerry, or any other prominent member of his administration made a solidarity-appearance with other world leaders in Paris (Attorney General Eric Holder was in Paris, and by all accounts was right across the street and still didn't show!) John Kerry brought in James Taylor to sing the U.S.'s apology.
Followed by an awkward, overly long and outright creepy man-hug by Kerry of French president Hollande.
I posted a clip of Brigitte Gabriel before, but here's the complete "Rise of Radical Islam" special. One of Hannity's more informative shows.
Brigitte Gabriel's and others' cited numbers, of muslims worldwide:
1.2 billion muslims worldwide. 15-25% are radicalized/jihadist (about 300 million).
From a 2013 study:
An average 77% of muslims in the 5 most populated states (Indonesia, Nairobi, Banghadesh, Pakistan, Egypt), support establishing Sharia law as the law of the state, and of establishing an Islamic caliphate.
There are 44 million muslims living in Europe, expected to rise to 58 million over the next 15 years. 6.5 million muslims live in France (10% of France's population). French President Hollande won with 93% of Muslim voters [defeating more pro-U.S./ pro-French-nationalist former president Sarkozy].
Brigitte Gabriel again, citing the history of Islamic immigration to France, and non-assimilation of so many muslims, in Europe, the U.S., Canada and Australia. Debating Khaled Baydoun, professor at Barry University school of law (in North Miami, near me!)
Even among highly-educated U.S. muslims, 58% don't believe criticizing Islam should be protected under the First Amendment. 48% of U.S. muslims think criticizing Islam should be criminalized. 12% of U.S. muslims think those criticizing Islam should be killed.
Repeating that there are 751 muslim-only "no-go" zones in France. And attempts by muslim immigrants to do the same in courts of the U.S. and other nations, "attempting to destroy Western nations from within" (quoting Islamic leaders.)
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
What is ignorant is hating people that don't intend you or anybody any harm.
Hate's not the issue. Acknowledging destructive cultural threats is.
I realize that you have a vested interest in defending as many minorities as possible so as accumulate more support in the cultural Marxist fold, but your inability to discriminate with whom you make friends only guarantees your own (violent) destruction as a social group. Keep in mind that members of this culture would have no problem killing you for the sake of the morality you keep solely as a sexual being (you ignored that part before, so lets see if you do it again).
You can deny hate isn't the issue but you don't have to delve to deep into posts to see that it is. But hey let's pretend it isn't. What are your principled ethical solutions for the Muslim threat you perceive?
How about the hate of Democrat/liberals, who label Tea Party members and other Republican leadership as "terrorists" (despite their not committing violence), while never labelling muslims who are actual terrorists as terrorists?
Liberals have also been quick to put "right wing hate" labels on multiple shooters over the last 5 years or so, despite that the shooters actually turned out after closer examination to, in fact, be liberals.
Plus at least two other liberal college professors who shot up their campuses. And the incredible media silence over Christopher Dorner's praise of MSNBC and other liberal-media pundits as the ideological source of the indoctrinated rage that fed his killing spree.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
You also continue to ignore Pariah's point, M E M.
Just a few days ago, ISIS tossed two gay arab men off a tall building to their deaths. Specifically because they were homosexual. Comrade Obama is enabling the expansion of muslim jihad by doing nothing to stop it. And if they can expand their Jihad into the U.S., you'll be one of the first ones they'll slaughter. Despite the exaggerated "tolerance" you express toward them, even as you intolerantly label conservatives who might not agree with you, but would never threaten you or deny you free speech.
Now would be the perfect time to quit supporting an oppressive regime that exports an ever-improving strain of religio-political Wahhabism found at the heart of groups like AQ, ISIL, etc...
Now would be the perfect time to suspend Islamic immigration to the United States, except for very selective proven friends of the U.S. (currently we bring in 100,000 muslims a year, and likely not very selectively).
We should also enact laws that more easily allow deportation and renouncement of citizenship to muslims who are proven to be involved in activities hosstile to the United States.
And European nations would be wise to do the same.
40% of the world's population is in India and China, some of the brightest and best potential immigrants in the world, I don't understand why Western nations even want muslim immigration at this point.
For that matter, we don't really need immigration at all at this point. We should reduce U.S. immigration from 1.2 million a year down to about 250,000 and secure our borders. And focus our resources on training and fully employing the vast numbers of unemployed and underemployed citizensalready here.
If either party really cares about the middle class and poor, that is.
Now would be the perfect time to quit supporting an oppressive regime that exports an ever-improving strain of religio-political Wahhabism found at the heart of groups like AQ, ISIL, etc...
You seem to be coyly referring to Saudi Arabia. And maybe Jordan. Great idea, alienate ourselves from the few allies we have left in the middle east. And further collapse U.S. influence in the region, as we already have with our 30-plus-year ally Mubarek in Egypt.
As proven with the fall of Mubarek, and with the Shah of Iran, and of Ghaddafi in Libya, what replaces our friendly dictator allies can be worse and less predictable than the dictatorships they replace. Iraq and Afghanistan are likely in the future to be added to that list of "the devil we don't know" replacing the one we know.
I kinda see where he's coming from here though. Saudi Arabia sends a constant flow of funding to Shariah-based Islamic schools in Europe that churn out ISIS sympathizers.
I get what you're saying about removing leaders that actually work consonant to our goals. However, Mubarak et al weren't funding subversive movements in Western countries.
Saudi Arabia is an ally. But I question its overall usefulness (compared to, say, Israel or Georgia) when it's encouraging the growth of weeds in our own backyard.
Suppose for a moment Saudi Arabia was absorbed into the ISIS fold, thus consolidating more of the ME into a singular body of hostility. What's the most we lose?
To me, it seems Saudi Arabia is playing a long, dangerous gambit to be the undisputed top dog (or last man standing) in a rejiggered pan-Arab world. It all rests--in my mind--on just how well Frankenstein can control his monster.
Is this the first time someone has so transparently played both sides in a bid for power? No. But, I do think this time could prove especially disastrous if things go awry.
I understand the want--even, the need--for a balance to Iran. I`m just not completely convinced that this one is the one with which we really ought to be siding.
A devil...no matter how well you know him...is still hardwired to do devilish things.
