There is a literal army of cops, military, and secret service in DC, apparently. They correctly anticipated these fucking retards, who feed on obnoxious protest events, would be shutting down highways and tearing up streets.
doesn't explain why damn near every actual rioter and vandal I've seen amid the protests has been some white kid. see, there's legitimacy to the fear of black Americans, and I think they're right to protest this moment. the interesting thing is, they've been far more orderly (from what I've seen; coverage varies from network to network) than their self-designated "allies". yes, a lot of people are loud and angry, and I support their right to be. but it's easy to tell who's wearing their Privilege Armor during their storm of egowank and virtue-signaling. the really sad thing is, when things get hand-to-hand violent and arrests and beatings start, the "allies" will fare far better than the mostly peaceful protesters.
I'd correct Martin Luther King, Jr, and say that Rioting is the opportunism of those pursuing an agenda other than The Unheard.
I've never seen rioting, whether in L.A. following the 1991 Rodney King verdict, Ferguson Missouri, Baltimore, or anywhere else that it didn't do the most destruction to The Unheard. That it didn't destroy the jobs, property and businesses of precisely those the rioting was alleged to champion.
Yes, it is rather odd that a lot of the people I saw filmed on that inauguration parade route wearing BLACK LIVES MATTER shirts were entitled bearded hippie-looking white kids. I don't know whether their skin color would prevent them from being arrested, but certainly their parents will provide them, if arrested, with far better lawyers than the black kids.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
I think everybody realizes that angle would make it look fuller but here's time lapse video of the mall that shows it never filling up... PBS time lapse video
It's gotta be embarrassing for the piece of shit's cheerleaders to be told obvious easy to debunk lies. At least his staff gets paid anyho
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
It's beautiful to see the airline take sides with the Republican guy who was harassed.
I'd love it if M E M could at least acknowledge how off the deep end this was. And how Democrats' opposition to the rule of law regarding Trump's win despite that he LAWFULLY WON THE ELECTION is likewise anti-American and way off the deep end.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
You guys have accused him of all sorts of things but bragging about being able to commit sexual assaul is a new one. Can't even imagine WB using the "everyone talks like that" line to defend a Clinton in that hypothetical.
After a year of constantly saying that Trump's behavior is going to keep him from winning, I don't think you're in any position to be saying what would have lost him the election. Especially since CNN, MSNBC, et al. treated the recording as though it was the proof that such an incident occurred.
Yes, damn those pesky Russians for leaking true, but negative, things about Hillary.
Funny how, out of one side of the libs' mouths we get "Hillary won the popular vote," and out of the other we get "the Russians cost Hillary the election."
If those emails were so damn dispositive, she shouldn't have won the popular vote, correct?
You can review what you guys were saying when the Russian hacked emails were being dribbled out at the tail end of the election. Along with the FBI inserting itself into the election to help Trump I watched a big Clinton lead dwindle down to a couple of points. Your logic that stuff like a gossipy Podesta emails has to be either enough to lose the popular vote or had no effect honestly seems dumb.
As it became clear on Tuesday night that Mrs. Clinton would lose to Donald J. Trump, supporters cast blame on everything from the news media to the F.B.I. director’s dogged pursuit of Mrs. Clinton over her personal emails, and to a deep discomfort with electing a woman as president.
But as the dust settled, Democrats recognized two central problems of Mrs. Clinton’s flawed candidacy: Her decades in Washington and the paid speeches she delivered to financial institutions left her unable to tap into the anti-establishment and anti-Wall Street rage.
And she ceded the white working-class voters who backed Mr. Clinton in 1992. Though she would never have won this demographic, her husband insisted that her campaign aides do more to try to cut into Mr. Trump’s support with these voters. They declined, reasoning that she was better off targeting college-educated suburban voters by hitting Mr. Trump on his temperament.
Instead, they targeted the emerging electorate of young, Latino and African-American voters who catapulted Mr. Obama to victory twice, expecting, mistakenly, that this coalition would support her in nearly the same numbers. They did not.
Early on, Mr. Clinton had pleaded with Robby Mook, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager, to do more outreach with working-class white and rural voters. But his advice fell on deaf ears.
It's really a case of you not wanting to admit the Russians helped your party win the election and what that means. They recognize Trump for what he is and what he'll accomplish for them.
I don't condone bragging about being able to commit sexual assault either.
This guy does
I'll say it again: If all the allegations against Trump were true (and they're definitely not), they would still pale beside what Bill Clinton is PROVEN to be guilty of.
When will M E M and the Democrat/Left give up this canard? Or at least hold their own to the same standard?
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
You guys have accused him of all sorts of things but bragging about being able to commit sexual assaul is a new one. Can't even imagine WB using the "everyone talks like that" line to defend a Clinton in that hypothetical.
I've known many guys who bragged about stuff they didn't actually do.
And yes, I do defend that as just locker room talk, to try and impress. Unlike Bill Clinton, Trump even in his bragging didn't force or intimidate a girl into doing anything. In Trump's recorded audio on the bus, Trump says that when you're famous, beautiful women want to be close to you, and they willingly let him (or other celebrities) do whatever they want with them. So in this hypothetical Trump bragged about, even if he really did it, it was always consensual.
Compare that with statements by Paula Jones or Juanita Broaddrick (to name only two), who were assaulted by Bill Clinton. And arguably assaulted again by Hillary Clinton, when she led the campaign to destroy these women, knowing these women were not lying about what Bill Clinton did to them.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
It's really a case of you not wanting to admit the Russians helped your party win the election and what that means. They recognize Trump for what he is and what he'll accomplish for them.
Another false narrative you are deceitfully trying to front. There is no evidence to support this. The intelligence evidence is that even the Russians thought Trump would lose, and that the best they (the Russians) could do is undermine her credibility as an elected president. They DIDN'T plan on Trump winning. PERIOD.
Further, the evidence is that WikiLeaks obtained the self incriminating e-mails of Hillary, Podesta, Wasserman (Bitch-Cunt) Schultz and other DNC officials through DNC officials, **NOT** from the Russians, as Julian Assange has said himself. Such as the suspiciously murdered Seth Rich, who arguably the Hillary campaign had killed to silence.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
You can review what you guys were saying when the Russian hacked emails were being dribbled out at the tail end of the election. Along with the FBI inserting itself into the election to help Trump I watched a big Clinton lead dwindle down to a couple of points. Your logic that stuff like a gossipy Podesta emails has to be either enough to lose the popular vote or had no effect honestly seems dumb.
As it became clear on Tuesday night that Mrs. Clinton would lose to Donald J. Trump, supporters cast blame on everything from the news media to the F.B.I. director’s dogged pursuit of Mrs. Clinton over her personal emails, and to a deep discomfort with electing a woman as president.
But as the dust settled, Democrats recognized two central problems of Mrs. Clinton’s flawed candidacy: Her decades in Washington and the paid speeches she delivered to financial institutions left her unable to tap into the anti-establishment and anti-Wall Street rage.
And she ceded the white working-class voters who backed Mr. Clinton in 1992. Though she would never have won this demographic, her husband insisted that her campaign aides do more to try to cut into Mr. Trump’s support with these voters. They declined, reasoning that she was better off targeting college-educated suburban voters by hitting Mr. Trump on his temperament.
Instead, they targeted the emerging electorate of young, Latino and African-American voters who catapulted Mr. Obama to victory twice, expecting, mistakenly, that this coalition would support her in nearly the same numbers. They did not.
Early on, Mr. Clinton had pleaded with Robby Mook, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager, to do more outreach with working-class white and rural voters. But his advice fell on deaf ears.
Another narrative by M E M and the DNC/Left easily disproven by the facts.
It wasn't the Russians, it wasn't FBI director Comey, it wasn't "fake news" (IRONY, how the Obama/Hillary-adoring media tries to float that one!), it wasn't any unfair leverage unleashed against Hillary. Despite that she out-spent Trump more than 2-to-one, despite having the collective media on her side, despite every dirty trick unleashed on Trump, despite even the Republican establishment attacking and undermining Trump, Trump still won. Fair and square. By campaigning harder, and campaigning on the issues that mattered to the public, and with a stated resolve to actually change course, that we have seen implemented with incredible speed in the last 7 days.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.