Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 12 of 12 1 2 10 11 12
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31





Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31


I was looking at Wikipedia's listing for the trump sexual allegations, and they've re-arranged it slightly:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

 Quote:
1 Accusations filed in court against Trump
1.1 Ivana Trump (1989)
1.2 Jill Harth (1992)
1.3 Summer Zervos (2007)
1.4 Alva Johnson (2019)

2 May 2016 New York Times story
3 Recording controversy and second 2016 presidential debate

4 Public allegations of unwanted physical contact since 2016
4.1 Jessica Leeds (1980s)
4.2 Kristin Anderson (1990s)
4.3 Cathy Heller (1997)
4.4 Temple Taggart McDowell (1997)
4.5 Karena Virginia (1998)
4.6 Mindy McGillivray (2003)
4.7 Rachel Crooks (2005)
4.8 Natasha Stoynoff (2005)
4.9 Juliet Huddy (2005 or 2006)
4.10 Jessica Drake (2006)
4.11 Ninni Laaksonen (2006)
4.12 Cassandra Searles (2013)

5 Allegations of pageant dressing room visits
5.1 Miss Teen USA contestants
5.2 Bridget Sullivan (2000)
5.3 Tasha Dixon (2001)
5.4 Unnamed contestants (2001)
5.5 Samantha Holvey (2006)



They rearranged it to the ones who have actually file cases in court, and into a second tier of those who publicly accused Trump of inappropriate sexual behavior short of rape.

And a third tier who said he walked in the Miss America dressing rooms and saw them changing, or "He looked at me creepy" typoe stuff. Which again, in the latter two categories, is not rape or sexual assault.

At least Wikipedia is a bit more honest about that in this new reformatting of their listing.



Less clear: none of these allegations are proven (as compared with, say, Bill Clinton, or the Kennedys).

Also less clear: Many of these women either:
1) were involved in business with Trump, and only made sexxual allegations after their business didn't go their way, and thus was motivated by payback
2) were politically motivated, by women who clearly stated their allegience to Hillary Clinton as who they were voting for and "Trump has to be stopped". And adding evidence to this motive, most of them revealed their allegations in October 2016, as an orchestrated "October surprise" to cripple Trump's candidacy in the weeks before the election. Most likely orchestrated by the Hillary campaign itself.


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Pariah
Trump will win in a landslide both in the popular vote and the electoral college.


"Are you eating it...or is it eating you?"

[center][Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com] [/center]

[center][Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com][/center]
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
Trump remains silent over Russia’s cyber attack

Can’t he pretend it’s a democratic governor that was going to be kidnapped by a right wing militia, tried and than executed?


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
Trump remains silent over Russia’s cyber attack

Can’t he pretend it’s a democratic governor that was going to be kidnapped by a right wing militia, tried and than executed?


This is just the same Democrat complaining about every crisis Trump faced during his presidency over the last 4 years: Why isn't Trump publicly telling the liberal media, and through them the Russians and the Chinese and the Iranians and the North Koreans, what he is planning?

Gee, I can't imagine. Perhaps so he won't telegraph his strategy and lose the element of surprise, so our enemy won't know in advance what he's doing?


THE DEMOCRATS: If it's bad for America, that's what they support.

And by the way, it's the guy at CISA who Trump fired, Christopher Krebs, who was asleep at his post for a year while Russia and China were hacking our cyber-defense infrastructure systems.

Krebs, the same moron who said "Our elections have never been more secure".


Maybe, y'know, if the deep state/Democrat-loyalist FBI and DOJ and CIA were not focused for the last 5 years on trying to destroy Trump and his administration, they might have been able to detect the foreign threats to our country's cyber-infrastructure THAT IT IS THEIR JOB TO PROTECT US FROM.

But yeah, it's all Trump's fault. Sure M E M... rolleyes


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
Since I posted trump actually did speak on this by contradicting his own government by saying it could be Gina, lol. Putin is going to miss his orange buffoon.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
Originally Posted by WB
Maybe, y'know, if the deep state/Democrat-loyalist FBI and DOJ and CIA were not focused for the last 5 years on trying to destroy Trump and his administration, they might have been able to detect the foreign threats to our country's cyber-infrastructure THAT IT IS THEIR JOB TO PROTECT US FROM.

But yeah, it's all Trump's fault. Sure M E M... rolleyes




M E M, you don't know your own ass from a hole in the ground. It's terrifying that you can vote, with your overzealous resistance to the true facts.

Our country's cyber-infrastructure has been hacked, and it's believed that the Russians, the Chinese and the Iranians are all involved in it. It's not Trump saying that, it's every expert and official I've seen interviewed regarding the cyber-security field. And no one can say for sure who did the hacking at this point, but the fingerprints seem to lead most to a group of Russian-employed hackers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cozy_Bear


These are people who could be paralyzing our country for a military invasion, could cause all our nuclear reactors nationwide to melt down, or imminently unleash a nuclear attack after neutralizing our early warning defense, and counter-attack capability. Or just shut down the nation's power grid, so we would all starve to death in a matter of weeks.

And you're partisanly just jumping on this as another way to blame Trump for something. Clearly, Trump is not any more of a cyber-security expert than Joe Biden is. It's the bureaucrats who are entrusted to protect us who have dropped the ball, not Trump himself. And I would far more Trust a proven and decisive leader like Trump to jump on eliminating those holes in the system, vs. an incompetent and corrupt Joe Biden, who is enslaved to the very nations attacking us by his corrupt financial relationships with them.

AGAIN: If these agencies were not turning all their energy the last 5 years on destroying Trump, maybe they would have detected these foreign attacks on U.S. cyber-security in advance.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
.



TRUMP DECLASSIFYING DOCUMENTS FROM FBI, DOJ, STATE DEPARTMENT, REVEALING AT LONG LAST HOW THESE AGENCIES PLOTTED ILLEGALLY AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL WITH THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN TO DESTROY TRUMP'S 2016 CAMPAIGN, AND THEN PRESIDENCY


Quote
by John Solomon, Jan 15 2021


Delivering in his final days on one of his last unfulfilled promises, President Trump is declassifying a massive trove of FBI documents showing the Russia collusion story was leaked in the final weeks of the 2016 election in an effort to counteract Hillary Clinton's email scandal.

The memos to be released as early as Friday include FBI interviews and human source evaluation reports for two of the main informants in the Russia case, former MI6 agent Christopher Steele and academic Stefan Halper.

The president authorized the release of a foot-high stack of internal FBI and DOJ documents that detail significant flaws in the investigation and provide a detailed timeline of when the FBI first realized the Steele dossier was problematic, multiple government officials told Just the News.
Among the bombshell revelations is an admission by Steele that he violated his confidential human source agreement with the FBI and leaked information from his dossier to the news media in the final weeks of the election because he wanted to counteract new revelations in the Hillary Clinton email scandal that were hurting her election efforts. The former foreign intelligence officer made the confession in a fall 2017 interview with agents.

Steele, who was hired by Clinton's campaign law firm to compile anti-Trump dossiers attempting to link Trump to Russian influence, told agents he had two clients at the time — Clinton and the FBI — and chose the interests of the Democratic candidate over the bureau in leaking.
Steele told the bureau that then-FBI Director James Comey's decision to reopen the Clinton email probe in fall 2016 triggered him to leak his dossier details in what he described as a taking-the-gloves-off moment.

The FBI interview summary makes clear that Steele, a British citizen, was allegiant to Clinton, did not like Trump and believed a Trump presidency would be negative for his homeland and thus made a decision to meddle in the U.S. election by leaking information to the news media.
The leaks, which led to Steele's termination as an FBI informant, have been known for more than a year, but his motivation for leaking was hidden in the classified documents.

His admission that the Russia collusion narrative, later debunked by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, was injected into the public as a means of counteracting Clinton's email scandal corroborates other information obtained by the CIA.

Late last year, the Trump administration declassified evidence showing the CIA warned President Obama and the FBI that it had intercepted intelligence indicating Hillary Clinton had personally ordered up an operation to "vilify" Trump with a false story of collusion as a means of distracting from the negative publicity of her email scandal.
Multiple investigations have concluded that much of Steele's dossier was debunked or never corroborated by the FBI and likely contained Russian disinformation planted with his sources.

The probes found the FBI wrongly continued to rely on the allegations of Russia collusion to target Trump campaign figures for investigation and failed to disclose major flaws in their investigations to the courts that had authorized surveillance warrants.

The investigation also found that Steele's primary source of Russian intel later disowned or distanced himself from the claims attributed to him in the Steele dossier and that U.S. intelligence had concerns the source was tied to Russian intelligence.
The soon-to-be-released records also expose a tantalizing connection between Steele, his primary source and one of the Democrats' key impeachment witnesses in the Ukraine scandal, former Trump National Security Council Russia expert Fiona Hill.

Steele divulged to the FBI that he was introduced by Hill to his primary sub-source of information for his anti-Trump dossier and that he later told Hill that the source had provided information for his now infamous memos.

The documents also will settle a long-debated question in Washington about whether the FBI's tactics amounted to spying on the Trump campaign.
Tasking instructions the FBI gave to Halper, an academic who long worked as an FBI informant, make clear he was instructed to infiltrate the Trump campaign by posing as someone who wanted to work for the GOP nominee and then targeting campaign advisers to find out what they knew about Trump or his campaign's ties to Russia.

Halper was specifically instructed by the FBI to focus on campaign advisers Sam Clovis, George Papadopoulos and Carter Page, in some cases recording some of their conversations, the records are expected to show.

In her impeachment testimony in 2019, Hill acknowledged she knew Steele since 2006 when he worked for MI6 and she worked for the Bush administration.
She, however, did not make any mention of introducing Steele’s primary subsource and in fact expressed her own doubts about the Steele dossier, suggesting it could very well have been Russian disinformation.
She said she held “misgivings and concern that he could have been played” by the Russians because they “would have an ax to grind against him given the job that he had previously.”

“I don’t believe it’s appropriate for him to have been hired to do this,” she testified about Steele. “I almost fell over when I discovered that he was doing this report.”


This could lead to indictments even after Trump's departure. And at the very least, at least much that has been stonewalled and hidden by FBI, DOJ and State Department bureaucrats, even after Trump months ago pressed them to disclose it, will finally be revealed to the public.

And maybe that sunlight alone will embarass corrupt officials into resigning, and vindicate Trump and his officials, after four years of malicious persecution.

This is the best news since Ric Grennell as acting Director of National Intelligence released a swarm of documents, including clossed-door testimony transcripts, whose mere revelation prevented the Democrat leadership from further lying, and crippled the Democrats' deceitful narrative that there was massive evidence against Trump regarding Russia collusion. There wasn't a single shred of evidence, and in a single day that narrative was over, and all the Democrats involved were proven to be liars. They lied for 3 years to CNN, MSNBC and the New York Times, saying there was evidence against Trump, but under oath in closed-door testimony they had to tell the truth, that there was no evidence against Trump. Which is why Rep. Adam Schiff kept the closed-door transcripts locked away and classified for so long. And once revealed, Adam Schiff has absolutely no credibility left. Likewise Rep. Eric Swalwell.

I hope this latest round shames a lot of these federaal agency Democrat operatives into resigning. Prison is where they belong, but I'll settle for truth that ruins their credibility, and simultaneously vindicates Trump.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
.

In a weird (and barely reported) event, FBI U.S. attorney John Durham stepped down as a U.S. attorney, but is staying on as special investigator of the Russia Hoax.

https://www.oann.com/fbis-wray-slow-walking-probe-into-russia-hoax-due-to-durham-probe/

Quote
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 8:31 AM PT – Wednesday, March 3, 2021
FBI Director Chris Wray admitted to slowing the investigation into origins of the Russia hoax, but insisted former U.S. attorney John Durham was to blame.

“Because we’re cooperating fully with Mr. Durham’s investigation, at his request, we have slowed that process down to allow his criminal investigation to proceed,” explained the agency chief.
Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday that the Obamagate probe had to proceed slowly because it had to go through the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility.

During the hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) attempted to get Wray to identify the cause behind the delay.
“At the moment, that process is still underway in order to make sure that we’re being appropriately sensitive to the criminal investigation,” stated the Louisiana lawmaker. “So, you’ve had had to hold up as a result of a criminal investigation.”
Republican senators have criticized the bureau for dragging their feet with regards to the potential prosecution of top Obama-era officials. They said those officials illegally spied on the 2016 Trump campaign and helped promote the Russia hoax for political purposes.


I'm very cynical that this investigation will ever turn up anything. It is a ruse to convince the public, and particularly Republicans, that investigation is actually happening. But I suspect this is just theatre, and in truth no case is being made. It is a ruse to give former Obama administration officials (specifically Obama himself, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, James Comey, James Clapper, John Brennan, Sally Yates, and FBI officials like Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Kevin Clinesmith, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew McCabe, and others in FBI/DOJ) cover for several more years, until they can say it was so long ago that it no longer matters, and quietly let the case die with no indictments.
Whereas the Comrade Commissar Soviets of the 97% Democrat-aligned DOJ/FBI maliciously prosecute non-existent crimes by the likes of Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort and George Pappadapoulos, with absurdly long sentences, corrupt judges and corrupt juries, just to smear and destroy those who supported Trump.

This comes despite Durham having resigned as U.S. attorney last month.
Meanwhile, he has continued in charge of the Russia hoax as a special counsel. Which is planned to accomplish absolutely nothing. I'd love to be proven wrong and see actual indictments and prosecutions of those I named above. But I'm not holding my breath.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
It’s not weird because that happens routinely when a new President is elected. Biden will allow Trump’s politically motivated investigation to continue but it’s main reason for being failed like his attempt to stop Congress from certifying the election results. Republicans are now focusing on making it harder to vote. I’m sure there will be new allegations for 2024 too I’m sure.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
It’s not weird because that happens routinely when a new President is elected. Biden will allow Trump’s politically motivated investigation to continue but it’s main reason for being failed like his attempt to stop Congress from certifying the election results. Republicans are now focusing on making it harder to vote. I’m sure there will be new allegations for 2024 too I’m sure.

It's not "politically motivated" because it was then-attorney general Barr who appointed Durham. And even then, Barr took his sweet time appointing a special investigation by Durham as U.S. attorney to investigate the CLEAR Democrat abuses in the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation, and in the Trump-Russia investigation. If iDurham's investigation were politically motivated, that investigation would have concluded at least 6 months to a year before the Nov 2020 election, as it should have. That Durham has stonewalled, as did the previous judge appointed before him, and has come forward with absolutely nothing despite overwhelming evidence, in particular internal self-incriminating texts and e-mails that FBI has done their damnedest to erase. But even what they couldn't hide is overwhelming and incriminating. Likewise the Hunter Biden laptop they tried to hide, and the Anthony Weiner laptop before that. Interesting how all these hidings of evidence work in the Democrat party's favor. AGAIN: by an FBI and DOJ that politically donates 97% for the Democrats. They have become the Democrat-Bolshevik party's KGB. They fly cover for Democrts, and maliciously prosecute and manufacture the evidence and FISA warrants to prosecute Republicans who should never have been prosecuted.

The politically motivated action is on the part of the 97% Democrat-campaign-donating DOJ and FBI. And by Democrats across the board in any branch of government, anywhere they are in power. In New York, in Michigan, in California, in the Dianne Feinstein case where she employed a Chinese spy for 20 years.
In the Eric Swalwell case where he was funded and having sex with a Chinese spy for his entire political career. And he still sits on House national security and judiciary committees, where he could be leaking top-secret information to China, who have incredible leverage over him.
Likewise "Joe China" Joe Biden, and son Hunter Biden, who have made tens of millions in secret deals with China, and are likewise wide open to blackmail. Talk about your Manchurian candidate!

Your piece of shit Democrat party is corrupt to the core.
I'm deeply concerned that this country might not be able to survive four years of Biden/Democrat control.
In every conceivable way, they are doing a fast-track to destroy this country:

1) ending the Canadian XL pipeline,

2) ending drilling on public lands (that also prevents drilling on private lands), Ending U.S. energy independence, despite that Trump made us energy-independent for the first time in 70 years. Now we will once again be dependent on hostile foreign nations, and more likely drawn into foreign mid-east wars that Trump insulated us from by energy independence.

3) ending construction on the border wall, ending 16,000 high-paying oil and construction jobs in the process, and ultimately 2 million jobs in related industries that will disappear,
4) putting the U.S. back in the Paris Accord agreement that will cripple U.S. industry, despite that we were lowering emissions faster than any other country WITHOUT the agreement under Trump, and despite that the agreement doesn't force similar compliance by the world's greatest polluters such as China, India, Pakistan, and Iran.

5) Not only ending Trump's securing of the border for the first time ever, but disastrously inviting a flood of illegal immigrants, enriching drug cartels who traffic illegals, and by encouraging it, subjecting tens of thousands of women and children to rape, murder and prostitution, that simply maintaining Trump's policy would have prevented. And also subjecting the entire nation to a surge of unvetted, medically untested illegals, many with Covid-19. Biden is endangering the entire country by not securing our border.

6) The flood of illegals is used as cover to further cause a spike in drugs across the border that Trump's policy was strangling out of existence.

7) an open border also means a flood of new criminals and terrorists to prey on Americans.

8) passing election legislation "House H R 1" bill, that will permanently destroy election integrity if passed. What was done in 6 states in Nov 2020 will become corrupt policy in all 50 states.

9) passing a 1.9 TRILLION "Covid relief": bill, that in truth is packed with decades of wet-dream Democrat pork spending, only 9% of which would actually go for Covid-19 prevention, and most of it going to Democrat political allies as a slush fund to attack Republicans.

10) Democrats are pushing to basically outlaw dissenting thought, to take Fox News, OAN, and Newsmax off of cable. To silence all non-Democrat political dissent in broadcast news. While simultaneously trying to take every Republican/conservative political group and grassroots spokesperson off of Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and other social media. It is the death of free speech, and the birth of a system like China, the Soviet Union, Cuba, and Venezuela, all of which regimes Democrat leaders have praised and share Bolshevik / authoritarian ideology with. It's no surprise they would attempt a power grab in the same vein as the authoritarian leaders they openly admire, quote and emulate. From the Clintons to the Obamas to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and Ocasio-Cortez, on down.

And that's far from a complete list of the Democrat-Bolshevik pushes to seize power, and destroy the nation on all fronts. What more evidence do you need, that the Democrats despise this country, and enact policy on every front to destroy it. Even in education and popular culture indoctrinating "1619 Project"-type ideology that the U.S. historically was and still is a racist, misogynist and evil place that doesn't deserve to exist. That serves only the ideological interests of Russia, China and every other foreign power that would like to destroy us. Democrats are destroying the country for them.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,820
Likes: 41
“ It's not "politically motivated" because it was then-attorney general Barr who appointed Durham.”

lol


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
“ It's not "politically motivated" because it was then-attorney general Barr who appointed Durham.”

lol


I think it's pretty clear that Trump was increasingly displeased with Barr's performance as attorney general in the last few months.

And that the evasion and delay of an actual investigation happened with Durham's predecessor, and continues now. If Durham's investigation were politically motivated, his report would have been released 6 to 12 months before the Nov 2020 election, to benefit Trump.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,064
Likes: 31
.

Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, and even White House servers to falsely link Trump to Russia, Durham finds

Quote
Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham found.

Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty.

The indictment against Sussmann, says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

But Durham's filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled "Factual Background," reveals that Sussmann "had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign."

Durham’s filing said Sussmann’s "billing records reflect" that he "repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations."

Page 12 of 12 1 2 10 11 12

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5