.
I don't understand the Democrat/Left's obsession wih making this all about Trump, of Trump allegedly being compromised by his relaionship with Jeffrey Epstein.
When the overwhelming evidence points to the Democrats.
Trump knew Jeffrey Epstein socially at parties, and is reported to have flown on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane ONCE, from New York to Palm Beach, and on that occasion was reported to have his wife and one of his daughters on the plane also. So with them along... where is his opportunity to have sex with Jeffrey Epstein's under-age sex slaves?
Further, it appears Trump spent just enough time privately with Epstein to see what Epstein was about, with all Epstein's under-age girls.
Trump saw Epstein was trouble, and wisely steered clear of Epstein after that.
And even more, threw Epstein out of the Mar A Lago club for mistreating the daughter of another club member, and for Epstein's recruiting young female employees away from Mar A Lago. After seeing Epstein up close, beyond just meeting him in public at social parties, Trump distanced himself after one flight together.
As contrasted with Prince Andrew, who had to make a $22 million settlement to Virginia Giuffre.
And Bill Clinton, who made 26 flights with Epstein aboard the "Lolita Express", 5 times of which Bill Clinton left behind his Secret Service protection detail, so as to not make them witnesses to his sinister actions.
And even further beyond that, two of Epstein's lawyers, Alan Dershowitz who legally defended Epstein when he was first convicted, and David Schoen who was Epstein's lawyer the second time in the 9 days before Epstein's death, BOTH ATTORNEYS said they had gone over what Jeffrey Epstein had against Trump and others, and Epstein had sworn to each of these atorneys that he had nothing compromising to use against Trump. That in either's consultations with Epstein, if he had anything,
ANYTHING to use against Trump, he would have revealed it to them and used it as leverage to get himself a lighter jail sentence.
David Schoen was accused of breaking attorney-client confidentiality to say this, but Schoen said that
1) Epstein was very vocal around many people, that he had nothing to use against Trump, that Epsttein was not quiet around anyone surrounding them during legal disscussions, or wanting confidentiality about what he did or didn't know.
And
2) that confidentiality no longer existed once Jeffrey Epstein was dead, that what was revealed could no longer harm him.
But by both attorney's accounts, Epstein had nothing compromising to reveal about Trump. Or he would have desperately used it to leverage a lighter sentence.
So... you guys are so eager to imply Trump is guilty of something, despite all this being common knowledge now, proving Trump is NOT.
And meanwhile, you are dismissive of the far greater evidence of Bill Clinton, and of
pretty much the entire Democrat party, for which Epstein had far more interaction, and was deeply involved in poliics and in fundraising for the Democrat party.
That said, I'm among the many Republicans who are disappointed that Trump has not pressed for release of all the evidence related to the Epstein case.
Though that might still be pending.
It annoys me that Trump, after vowing to release all the evidence, now says reporters should stop asking him about the Epstein case evidence.
Although that could simply be because the Trump-hating liberal media and Democrat leadership are using the Epstein case to eclipse all of Trump's many other Nobel Prize-worthy peace agreements and economic deals.
But I DO think everything should be revealed about the Epstein case, and that contrary to Trump's dismissive comments, it REMAINS VERY IMPORTANT.
Epstein employed under-age girls as sex slaves and videotaped those sessions as blackmail against industry leaders, against billionaires, against politicians, and perhaps heads of government intelligence agencies of nations worldwide. Epstein had close o a billion-dollar fortune, and i's sill a mystery what the source of his wealh was, other than blackmailing famous people after videoaping hem having sex with under-age girls.
There are about 300 then-underage girls (who are now women) who were used for these videotaped blackmail sessions, and they have the potential to incriminate perhaps
thousands of very important men involved, in nations worldwide. Details that could topple governments.
So it is important, and should no be dismissively swept under a rug.
And it bothers me that attorney general Pam Bondi, FBI director Kash Patel, and assistant director Dan Boningo, who a month prior just said there were mountains of evidence they had on their desks and were reviewing, now say "Oops, sorry, there's no evidence after all. That's all there is"
I don' believe that for a second. They JUST SAID they had tons of evidence they were going through.
Maybe there's not enough evidence to convict, maybe the Deep State hid the evidence during the Biden years, and the curren DOJ don't have enough evidence to convict yet, but maybe they are confident it will surface or be disclosed by whistleblowers who didn't burn the evidence as ordered by he likes of Comey, McCabe and Brennan.
Okay, say that then, but don't try to bamboozle us and say there's nothing there. That might be the truth, but after their prior statements, that doesn't seem believable.
Patel, Boningo and Bondi have indicated that many of these Jeffrey Epstein sex slaves who were then young teen girls, are now women in their 30's and 40's who are now married and have children, and don't want to participate with DOJ as witnesses and have their lives and families ripped apart again.
But the liberal media and the Democrats are no better.
During the last 4 years, 2 of which
Democrats controlled all three branches of government, and all 4 years they controlled the presidency, the DOJ and the FBI, the Democrats never showed
he slightest interest in investigating or releasing documents about Eptsein.
So while I'm less than thrilled with Bondi, Patel, and Boningo, the hypocrisy of the Democrat / Left and George Orwell's liberal media, frankly stinks to high heaven.
I even consider the possibility that Bondi, Patel and Boningo could have been threatened or blackmailed into silence.
That was certainly what was attempted 30 years ago, under the Bill Clinton administration in the 1990's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_FBI_files_controversyAnd the Democrat-Bolshevik Party is ten times as mean and ideologically crazy now.
As evidenced by the weaponization of government for the last 9 years by Obama himself, Joe Biden, Hillary Clintton, James Comey, James Clapper, John Brennan, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Rod Rosenstein, Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Susan Rice, on down.
{b] HEADS OF EVERY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ON UP TO EVERY WHITE HOUSE CABINET MEMBER, UP TO OBAMA AND BIDEN THEMSELVES[/b]
And that is just a fact at this point.
And to hide that fact, the Democrat / Left and the liberal media try to create a new false narrative about Trump, despite ALL the evidence
against them, against the Democrat party leadership, and against the liberal media who did their damnedest to cover it up for the last 9 years.
