Quote: the G-man said: Another example of "mainstream" liberal hate:
The St. Petersburg Democratic Club has taken out in a local weekly newspaper, with these "nice, clean comments" about Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld:
If that's what they want to do to the President's Secretary of Defense, you have to wonder what they are planning for the President.
Granted, after the Drudge Report picked up on the ad, the Club Vice President Edna McCall claimed they didn't mean it literally. But how much do you have to hate a President to not immediately realize what "pull the trigger" means?
(BTW, suppose a local Republican club placed a newspaper ad soliciting donations for President Bush and urging the assassination of a prominent Democratic official. Wouldn't it be national news?)
No one from the club could be reached for comment, but the ad was condemned by other Democrats, including the presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry.
"We are calling the Pinellas County Democratic Party chair about this ad and demand that it be retracted," Kerry campaign spokesman Stephanie Cutter told CNN. "John Kerry does not condone this type of advertising and believes that it is wrong."
Pinellas County Democratic Party Chairman Kevin Jensen told CNN that he, too, was outraged by the ad, and said party officials "don't condone this type of stupidity."
The club, listed on the Pinellas County Democratic Party's Web site as one of its "officially chartered" clubs, does not speak for the county party, he said.
Liberals frequently make these kind of un-American statements and gestures, and then backtrack later when they are exposed on camera or in written articles.
Yourself included, Matter eater Man, over the last two pages of this topic (which is more or less an extension of this one: )
Do liberals HATE America? HERE You give a list of protest slogans you endorse, and then backtrack to say you don't, when called on your blatant anti-Americanism.
But the truth is:
How different is this call to put Ashcroft "up against the wall", from the DAILY bitter rhetoric unleashed by Democrats against Bush and his administration?
They call Ashcroft "Asscroft".
They call Bush "The Puppet", "The Chimp", "The Shrub", and a dozen other names I can't remember.
As the signs in the above photos demonstrate (which Whomod click-and-dragged across several topics) this "put Ashcroft up against the wall" venom is absolutely no different from what liberals/Democrats are chanting constantly --and I don't mean radical fringe liberals, I mean visible mainstream liberals who are out there every day, spewing "Bush is an idiot" and other statements that are similarly objective in reviewing the facts.
Is Ted Kennedy not a "mainstream" liberal ?
Is Howard Dean (who alleges Bush knew in advance of 9-11, without evidence) not a mainstream liberal ?
Is Al Gore not a mainstream liberal ?
Is John Kerry not a mainstream liberal (who without evidence expressed off camera --he thought !!-- that Bush and his cabinet are "the worst bunch of crooks I've ever seen". )
Is Tom Daschle ?
Nancy Pelosi ?
If these are not "mainstream" liberals, then who the hell is ?
Liberals and Democrats call Bush a "draft evader", alleging --without evidence-- that Bush went A.W.O.L. for a short period while he was in the National Guard.
And yet these same liberals turn a blind eye to the fact that Bill Clinton unquestionably IS a draft evader. Proven by many witnesses, and a letter in Clinton's own handwriting.
Bush served in the National Guard, and yet liberals regard him as worse than a true draft evader.
And if Republicans bring up the fact that Clinton is unquestionably a draft evader, then liberals/Democrats regard that as "picking on" Clinton.
Nice double-standard.
And par for the course with virtually all liberals.
I ask you: Which side makes up the conspiracies and allegations to suit their hate, and ignores the true facts?
Clearly, it is Democrats.
Bitter, angry, slanderous allegations toward Bush and his administration.
No evidence against Bush.
Democrats undermine our military, divide our nation, sneer at a proven Islamic terror threat, sneer at a Republicvan administration for acting against a threat "without evidence", and accusing Bush of "blood for oil", "war profiteering" , BLA BLA BLA.
All this, despite that the U.N. weapons inspection reports, and the intelligence of every other nation involved with Iraq, saw the same threat that Bush is allegedly making up.
And these liberals disgrace America before the world with their bitter unfounded allegations. For what?
To promote their own vicious agenda, by whatever illicit means available.
The level of hate in Democrats --and I mean many, a visible majority, not just a select few-- I wouldn't put assasination of Republican leaders out of the realm of their liberal fanaticism.
Again: What Democrats/liberals are doing is so far removed from any possible illusion of productive discourse, or respectful civil disobedience. It is not "democracy". It is disgrace.
It is an angry, bitter slander campaign, a vicious weekly exercise in character assasination and erosion of our institutions.
Against factual charges, Bush could more easily defend himself.
But how does Bush defend himself against liberal innuendo, rumor, half-truth, deliberate distortion, slander, conspiracy theories, and pure unrelenting liberal hate?
The allegations affect public perception by sheer quantity of allegations, not based on any evidence. The American public hears the allegations so often, they feel after a while there must be some truth to the charges.
But it's liberal smoke. That's all there is.
~
Bush gave a great statement and press conference tonight. And as much candor as he was able to give. You could see the piranha in the press room, waiting to tear off a piece of him.
It must be very difficult for him to be patient and sincere, when he is attacked so bitterly and baselessly every single day.
Quote: Matter Eater Man said:
No one from the club could be reached for comment, but the ad was condemned by other Democrats, including the presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry.
This would be the same John Kerry who made an obligatory press statement about what a good thing it was that Saddam Hussein was captured?
And then, hours later, made bitter accusations about how incompetent the Bush administration is, and how if anyone else was President, Saddam would have been captured months earlier?
Lying, divisive piece of crap liberal.
~
Bush's speech tonight was outstanding. It cut to the bone of what the conflict in Iraq is all about: bringing democracy, freedom and hope to the Middle East through a seed planted in Iraq, knowing that war is costly, but that we have to stay the course, and do the job right.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
