Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
Quote:

DtWB said:
That's still a bitter liberal partisan smear on your part that bypasses the truth.


How can you tell if Wednesday is being bitter?
Quote:

DtWB said:
...In contrast to Ted Kennedy's remarks about President Bush, which are vicious accusations based on a pathetically flawed argument. Not just a bungled sentence, but the very foundation of Kennedy's partisan attack is based on science fictional misrepresentation of the facts, and pure malice on his part.


That sounds very different from the previous posters who declared Kennedy as "senile" or a "lush". It's somehow fair to make these judgements from one gaffe? As for pathetically flawed arguments, have you ever heard Bush talk about his plans for Social Security?




Kennedy has made many similar attacks on Bush, regarding the Patriot Act, 9-11, military spending in Iraq, the decision to invade Iraq, the inability to find WMD's despite Saddam Hussein's clear pursuit of WMD's and material breach of U.N. weapons bans on WMD's for Iraq.

Each a baseless emotionally charged slander attack, whose sole purpose (rather than a serious inquiry with the best interests of the nation in mind) is to put on a show for his ultra-liberal voter-base, and feed their preconcieved notions with more baseless smears on Bush, that confirm what they (without facts) already believe.

Kennedy (on a more personal level) may be other things as well, but I'm not overly concerned with those allegations.

Chappaquiddic is proven.
Ted Kennedy's cheating at Harvard is proven.
The Kennedy family's rigging of elections through its ties to the Mafia is proven.

I concern myself with things that can be proven.

The more personal allegations of Kennedy's personal life don't concern me.
Only where he negatively impacts our government, national defense, and public policy.




And on your other point, I grant you, that Bush's social security reform plan was one of the most poorly executed events of his presidency.

It's undeniable that social security is in jeapordy and needs reformed.

But I think Bush's plan, while it may have been a valid proposal, was poorly explained and thus gained no support, even within the Republican party.
I was solicited to support it, and I wrote my congressman (Clay Shaw) and both FL senators, and said that unless the plan were better presented in detail, I could not.

I know you guys like to portray all republicans as just goose-stepping behind anything Bush proposes, but that really isn't the case.

  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.