Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
the G-man #1224636 2017-12-09 5:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
This "addition" to Roy Moore's signing of her yearbook is significant, because hers were the most salacious allegations of Roy Moore's accusers. She said she was 14, and Roy Moore roughly kissed her and grabbed at her private parts. This forced clarification on her part puts in question everything she alleged about Roy Moore.

In addition, the inconsistencies I cited earlier:

  • She alleged he picked her up at her mother's house, but court orders show she was a rebellious girl with disciplinary problems, to the point that custody at that time was taken away from her mother, and she was living with her father. But she alleged Moore would pick her up on the other side of town, at her mother's house.
  • She alleged that she would take phone calls from Moore in her room. But court transcripts from 1979 have her mother clearly saying she did not have a phone in her bedroom.
  • At the mall where Moore was allegedly trolling for under-age girls, the mall allegedly banned him from there, with the threat the police would be called if he showed up there. But the guy who was the mall manager said that NEVER HAPPENED, and there was no such restraint on him coming to the mall. I find it hard to believe he could remain an assistant district attorney if it were true
  • Likewise, a waitress from 1977-1979 who worked with all the girls allegedly hit on said despite being employed there 3 years through that exact period, she never saw Moore there, or heard anything about him from her co-workers.


So while not as publicized, the inconsistencies abound about Moore's accusers. And I, like the majority of Alabama voters, don't believe the accusations, and consider them a politically timed hit job.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
You may have noticed there's a huge movement of those sexually harassed coming forward against powerful people. When it's a republican politician apparently it's all lies and orchestrated. Get the pedo elected. It's fitting with Trump in office.



It would have been even more fitting when Bill Clinton was in office. Who has legitimately been accused of rape, sexual harassment as governor, and more recently sex with under-age girls on "pedophile island" alongside his pedophile billionaire buddy, where Bill Clinton temporarily abandoned his Secret Service agents to hide his activities.
Bill Clinton, who was disbarred for perjury and fined almost $100,000.
And Hillary Clinton, who knew the accusations were true, but led the charge to destroy Bill Clinton's accusers, despite that Hillary knew the truth.
Or perhaps we could discuss the huge donations from muslim nations to the Clinton Foundation, that bought the Clintons' silence on the misogyny and suppression of women in muslim nations.



As I said previously, the Democrats such as Franken, Conyers, Charlie Rose and Matt Lauer folded quickly under pressure of the accusations because they're clearly true. Including photographic/video evidence in Franken's case and some others.

I'm persuaded in the Trump and Moore cases of their innocence because:
1) Both firmly protest their innocence across the board. There is no half-hearted ambiguous apology from either.
2) The accusations in Trump's and Moore's cases are both from roughly 40 years ago, with no recurring victims in the intervening 38 years or so. If they were predators, there would be an ongoing pattern of bad behavior, and would be more victims coming forward, from more recently.
3) Both the Trump and Roy Moore cases follow an identical pattern of DNC dirty tricks, of an orchestrated salvo of accusations coming out all at once, from 38-plus years ago, just weeks before the election. These would be difficult to prove in court from so long ago, and their only real purpose is to slime the candidates right before the election. But in both cases, the constituents aren't buying the accusations, or at least not nearly enough of them.


There are other Republicans who have committed bad acts that I don't defend. In these two cases, the circumstances make me question the accusers, not the candidates.


Wonder Boy #1224641 2017-12-09 1:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
I think the RNC is just showing that if Clinton had an R behind his name he would have been just fine. Trump's accusers were certainly not just from decades ago btw.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
I think the RNC is just showing that if Clinton had an R behind his name he would have been just fine.


That doesn't even make sense. Except to just weave the accusation out of thin air.

 Quote:
Trump's accusers were certainly not just from decades ago btw.


All the ones I heard were from the late 1960's. Such as one lady who said Trump groped her on a passenger flight. And by the wildest of coincidences, her and 8 or 9 other women randomly decided to collectively accuse him right after the Access Media bus tape (ALSO from 12 years ago) right before the election. Trump's legal team blasted lots of holes in the inconsistencies of their stories as well.

Republicans accused generally resign quickly, and are roundly condemned and pressured to do so by their peers. And I've always been one to join that call. (Rep Mark Foley, for example. Which while true, was also orchestrated a year in advance as an October surprise blanket attack on the entire GOP.)

But as in the case of the Duke Lacrosse team alleged rape, and the 2015 Rolling Stone manufactured fake expose, there >>>ARE<<< cases where the allegations are not true. Timing accusations in the final weeks before an election, of people who have been in the public spotlight for more than 4 decades, seems to ring false, and to be rather maliciously timed.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Wonder Boy #1224653 2017-12-10 2:04 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man


1 Kristen Anderson ("early 1980's")
2 Mariah Billado (1997)
3 Lisa Boyne (1996)
4 Rachel Crooks (2005)
5 Tasha Dixon (2001)
6 Jessica Drake (2006) - Adult film star!
7 Jill Harth (1992-1993) -Vendetta and lawsuit with Trump in other business
8 Cathy Heller (1997)
9 Samantha Holvey (2006)
10 Ninni Laaksonen (2006)
11 Jessica Leeds (1980's)
12 Melinda McGillivray (2003)
13 Cassandra Searles (2013)
14 Natasha Stonyoff (2005) -PEOPLE magazine reporter!
15 Bridget Sullivan (2000)
16 Temple Taggart (1997)
17 Ivana Trump (1989 - The point reading I >>>KNEW<<< I was being hustled!)
18 Karena Virginia (1998)
19 Summer Zerves (2007)


Okay, some of the allegations are more recent than I recalled previously. But most go back 20 years or more. There are only 5 that don't pre-date the Access Hollywood bus video. All are years before the period Trump became a presidential candidate.

But
1) Many of these women clearly have a political agenda, and clearly state their opposition to Donald Trump as president, and therefore have a clear agenda to make allegations to undermine him as president. I would want to see a background for each of these women's political affiliations, and who they voted for, and if they supported/openly advocated Hillary Clinton and other Democrats. That is the case of many of Roy Moore's accusers as well.

2) While I don't dismiss the more serious accusations of Trump groping and allegedly forcing himself on a few of these women, by their accounts, many of these seem straining to allege anything sexually illicit. Some of the Miss USA contestants say he walked through the dressing room while they were changing. Even if true, that is hardly sexual assault.
Including IVANA TRUMP as an "accuser" is outrageous. She said what she did during a bitter divorce where he'd left her for Marla Maples, and she briefly made some accusations she retracted almost 30 years ago. Saying "I >>>FELT<<< raped" emotionally is much different than saying she was physically raped by Trump. There is clearly a vindictive agenda on the part of the Atlantic in their including this in the article. It is billed as "19 accusers" which sounds persuasive until you read through and see how silly some of the alleged "sexual accusations" are. Trump walked through a dressing room, WOW!
One is a pornstar/porn director who probably is aligned with the Hollywood liberal elite, and has no credibility from the outset. Likewise, the PEOPLE magazine reporter, who apparently from her remarks has accused many others of sexually inappropriate behavior and/or assault.
Another sued Trump over a real estate business deal and likewise has every motive to slime him.
Some of the others just say Trump leaned in for a kiss, and that is open to interpretation. I have French and Brazilian female friends who do the kiss-on-the-cheek thing at parties, and beautiful as they are, I'm frankly not comfortable kissing a girl like that who's not my girlfriend. And 20 years later, they could spin it as something it was not. It's laughable to me that Miss America contestants complain about Trump "looking at us like we were just meat". Do these girls understand what a beauty contest is?!? You walk out on stage and spin around for the judges in a dress or a bikini. I fail to see from their own account what Trump did wrong.

Of Trump's 19 "accusers" (18 actually because Ivana never accused him in 2016) maybe 15 if you eliminate the "he walked through the dressing room" accounts, maybe down to 10 or less if you eliminate the "he looked at me like I was meat" or "he kissed me at a crowded social event" type accusations. And then you're left with a few that look on the surface like actual accusations of something truly inappropriate if Trump actually did it.

But then you get into Democrat political affiliations of the accusers, other assorted personal/professional vendettas against Trump as possible motivation, and actual witnesses to what objectively happened.

Wonder Boy #1224661 2017-12-13 2:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Doug Jones projected the winner!


Fair play!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
This was a surprise. I knew he had a chance but that is a deep red state. And Trump went all in.


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
My condolences, MEM. This means Franken really does have to resign.

the G-man #1224664 2017-12-13 2:59 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Lol, your bitterness is noted. Wonder what the Trump tweets will be. I'm guessing he'll go with accusing the election being rigged.


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Why would I be bitter? I don't live in AL and I've never come out in support of Moore. I've only pointed out the hypocrisy of people like you who have no problems supporting Democrats who sexually harass or assault all females.

the G-man #1224666 2017-12-13 3:45 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
 Originally Posted By: the G-man
ABC News reports Beverly Young Nelson will have a news conference later today. In this interview, she indicates that she added the date/location to the yearbook but maintains the signature is Roy Moore's.

How is Gloria Allred still a lawyer, again? Even if every other accuser is 100% truthful this stunt probably just helped put Moore over the top.


This looks supportive of Moore. You were relatively quiet but when it came time to post something that might help a pedo win, you were there to post it. But if your heart was in different place we can both celebrate that the better person won tonight.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Offline
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
Unfortunately, odds are the DNC will claim this as a win for their establishment despite numbers showing this one hinged on the black vote they've done embarrassingly little to court since the departure of Obama. I haven't been a registered Republican since about 2010, so I don't really have a stake in this, but truthfully neither party deserves the grassroots support they've gotten the past several years. Glad Alabama was ultimately able to make the difficult moral decision of not going with the guy who actually needed to put forth a concerted effort to try and prove he wasn't a kiddie fiddler, though the closeness of the election proves that's not as obvious a choice as I had hoped.


go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_special_election_in_Alabama,_2017

The write in votes (i.e., voters saying "none of the above") were over 22,000, exceeding the margin that Doug Jones won the election by. So it was hardly a statement by Alabama voters that they enthusiastically embrace Democrats. Moore has no humiliation, it was a close election. (Although it can be argued in conservative Alabama, a different Republican candidate would have won in a landslide.)
Moore's loss was a combination of 1) Moore having conservative views that even many conservatives distanced themselves from (making his candidacy flawed from the outset), and 2) further handicapped by lurid allegations of trolling underage girls.
Apparently high black voter turnout was a factor that pushed Doug Jones over the top as well, because Jones prosecuted KKK leaders, and/or because Dems successfully painted Roy Moore as a racist.

I was surprised how much commentary on Fox voiced the idea that it was better for the GOP that Moore lost, because now the GOP won't have to possibly seat him and deal with ongoing sexual allegations, and that the GOP doesn't potentially share in getting slimed by the DNC for seating Moore under the shadow of these allegations.

As close at the election was, I don't see this as a decisive referendum where Alabama voters rejected Moore, either on his conservative views, or on the underage sex allegations. It was very close, roughly 48% vs. 49%, with a lot of write-in votes rejecting both, greater than the margin of victory.

The same Alabama Senate seat is up again in 3 years. Oh well, hopefully next time, with a less handicapped Republican candidate.

I actually envisioned a scenario where, if Moore had won, Jeff Sessions could leave or be fired as Attorney General, and Moore could willingly give up the seat if Sessions were appointed back to his former Senator position.

Wonder Boy #1224669 2017-12-13 12:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Offline
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
It wasn't the sort of landslide you might consider a "decisive referendum", but it's the same sort of statement which was made to the DNC last year. No election is anyone's to lose. You can't just hang your party's letter and endorsement on a fundamentally flawed candidate and expect that to win voters over (even against another fundamentally flawed candidate) once demographic segments of the voting populace you've ignored (or outright rejected) actually show up to vote. Last year, DJT wouldn't have won without rural white voter turnout, and this year, the Dems wouldn't have won without near-total black voter turnout. Of course, these scenarios could be avoided if someone out there decides to advance policies that actually benefit EVERYONE, but that's a silly pipe dream of mine.


go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Like education and healthcare?


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Offline
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
We all like education and healthcare, MEM! I'm not sure where you're going with that sentence, though...


go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
I know it's not a winning argument here coming from me but I think the Democratic Party does put a priority on those issues. GOP really doesn't. CHIP for example is being used as a bargaining chip by them. If both sides really valued it than one side wouldn't be able to use it like a hostage. Btw thank you black voters and republicans that can look beyond just getting their guy in.


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
 Quote:
This looks supportive of Moore.


i think you need new glasses.

the G-man #1224675 2017-12-14 11:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
So you think you didn't post a bit of information that Moore was hoping to use to discredit his accusers?


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
So you think you didn't post a bit of information that Moore was hoping to use to discredit his accusers?


I posted a "bit of information" that came from ABC News. Are you now claiming ABC was supporting Moore by issuing that news story?

It shows the depth of your bias that you think simply reporting a fact which might not be completely damning to a republican is somehow a show of support.

the G-man #1224679 2017-12-15 1:17 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
ABC News covered the whole thing, you did not. You just posted the one bit Moore was trying to use. Maybe you feel you didn't but I think looking at the thread you really just played judge on the other side and the bit Moore was using. The RNC ended up supporting Moore in his election. Did you have a problem with that?


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
So you think you didn't post a bit of information that Moore was hoping to use to discredit his accusers?


I pointed out that Allred's actions may have inadvertently helped discredit Moore's accusers while I conceded the possibility that a number of them could be tellng the truth:

 Quote:
How is Gloria Allred still a lawyer, again? Even if every other accuser is 100% truthful this stunt probably just helped put Moore over the top.


Again, you're letting your own biases show here.

the G-man #1224681 2017-12-15 3:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
We already know how you always feel about Dems and bias g. As I pointed out you really just seem to be willing judge the one side. You come off more neutral when it's a pedophile republican. Again how do you feel about the RNC supporting such a candidate? That I would think wouldn't be a hard question.


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Now we learn that Allred's daughter, attorney Lisa Bloom, was offering to arrange payments to women who made sexual misconduct claims against Trump.

You don't need to support Moore to realize that when people like Allred and Bloom do this, it feeds right into the mentality of Moore and Moore supporters that his accusers were lying.

the G-man #1224683 2017-12-16 4:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
When that is all you want to discuss I think that constitutes support. Your party went all in for him. Does that bother you at all?


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
We already know how you always feel about Dems and bias g. As I pointed out you really just seem to be willing judge the one side. You come off more neutral when it's a pedophile republican. Again how do you feel about the RNC supporting such a candidate? That I would think wouldn't be a hard question.


Irony, that...

You are a rubber stamp for the most ruthless, immoral, criminal, and outright republic-destroying things the Democrats do. In any given political discussion, you can be counted on to parrot the most lying DNC talking points.

Lois Lerner and the IRS, harassing and auditing Tea Party and religious conservative groups, and large Republican donors like Frank Vandersloot. No problem.

Hillary Clinton jeopardizing national security with her private e-mail server, leaving national security ripe for the hacking EVERY DAY she was secretary of state by the Russians and Chinese. No problem!
The Clintons selling state department access through large donations to the Clinton Foundation. No problem. Even as you allege treason that is nonexistent for Donald Trump and his inner circle. In fact, the trail leads right back to FusionGPS, Veselnetskayav and the Democrats, who ACTUALLY WERE colluding with the Russians. No problem.

The blatant corruption and bias of Comey, Rosenstein, FBI agent Peter Strvok, and the entire Meuller investigative team, 9 of whom are DNC campaign donors, and a U.S. Federal judge who have all been exposed in the last weak for their fanatic zeal and clear bias against the Trump administration. No problem!

You seem oblivious to the fact that your side is turning the United States into a "Deep State" authoritarian banana republic, where the party in power weaponizes the branches of government to smash their political opposition. That's not even a complete list of recent outrages by your side. And you don't care, so long as it advances your liberal progressive cultural Marxist utopia. Until it ultimately destroys the country.


Wonder Boy #1224687 2017-12-17 4:34 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Offline
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
 Originally Posted By: Wonder Boy (emphasis added)
...You seem oblivious to the fact that your side is turning the United States into a "Deep State" authoritarian banana republic, where the party in power weaponizes the branches of government to smash their political opposition...


Ummmm... Wondy? Not sure this is a good fight to pick right now.


go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31

The Republican party (divided between the Establishment Republicans and the Trump/Tea Party/Constitutionalists who are attempting to restore free market and the rule of law) are not like the Obama administration.

Trump/Republicans are not weaponizing the IRS against Democrat grassroots organizations and large Republican donors, as Obama/Clinton/Democrats did.

Trump/Republicans are not weaponizing the FBI and CIA with illegal FISA requests, so they could do illegal surveillance on Trump campaign officials, and even on the incoming Trump administration. That is Watergate-level stuff, at least!

If you have a case to make, I wish you would factually make it, instead of implying something untrue without any supporting facts.

Trump, however bombastic, is essentially a pragmatist and not an ideologue, and he is attempting to reverse LAWFULLY the deep-state/establishment destruction of the U.S. from within, that has been occurring for the last 30 years. In many ways like Reagan, Trump is getting resistance from both political sides, and from the globalist campaign finance lobbyist puppetmasters who control both sides. Despite resistance and obstruction of his opposition on both sides, Trump is enacting reforms and getting a remarkable amount done. He is bringing his own party kicking and screaming to victory, against their own self-destructive will.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
When that is all you want to discuss I think that constitutes support.


Of course, MEM. After all, anyone who knows me on this board knows I'm totally uninterested in discussing legal procedure, strategy and attorney behavior as it pertains to politics. This focus on same is a whole new preoccupation for me which will certainly wane now that Moore lost.

the G-man #1224705 2017-12-19 3:03 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
I was of course speaking about this thread in particular. Obviously you don't do that on every thread. The Franken one for example where there was no pedophilia involved. Say does it bother you that the RNC went all in on Moore?


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
It doesn't bother me.
Moore was a flawed candidate in other ways that shaved off his support from the outset. The teenage girls allegations (by the admission of her accusers, even in the worst case scenario if all the allegations were true, none of which involved sex, I remind you) piled on Moore's otherwise controversial record, and maybe shaved off just enough to let Jones win.

To have a problem with Moore, or with the RNC for supporting him, one has to believe that the allegations are true. I don't. The inconsistencies in the girls' testimony, and in virtually all cases their undeniable Democrat partisanship (while ignored by the media, in their effort to help Jones get elected) are clear.

Are you ashamed that for decades the DNC has been all in for Bill and Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Gerry Studds, Al Franken, and many others who have more clear evidence of guilt as sexual predators, and in Hillary's case, leading the charge to destroy husband Bill's accusers, that she knew to be telling the truth?
Only political expediency has made the Dems condemn these abusers in their own DNC ranks, and many of them have quickly backtracked and regret condemning and leveraging out Al Franken.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
Obviously you don't do that on every thread. The Franken one for example where there was no pedophilia involved.


Why in heavens name would I discuss alleged forged evidence and attorney misconduct in a thread where neither are alleged to have occurred?

the G-man #1224823 2018-01-06 3:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31



RAILROADED: THE REAL REASON AL FRANKEN IS NO LONGER A SENATOR

 Quote:
Three weeks after volunteering as Democratic Party tribute Hunger-Games-Style, Al Franken has finally relinquished his Senate seat. Operation: Moral High Ground, the Democrats’ transparent plan to claim victory in America’s #metoo moment, was a simple one.

Step One: Run Al Franken out of town. No ethics investigation. No consideration of Minnesota voters. No censure or lesser discipline. Just an aggressive Franken-ectomoy.

Step Two: Sit back and wait for alleged pedophile Roy Moore to win a Senate seat in Alabama’s special election.

Step Three: Make sure Franken’s exit shares a news cycle with Roy Moore’s entrance. It would have been the Holy Grail of partisan juxtaposition—the split-screen video image to end all split screen video images.


Step Four: Scream into the echo chamber that Republicans are the Roy Moore party and Democrats are the party of women.

But Roy Moore lost, and Operation: Moral High Ground turned out to be an Acme rocket that blew up Al Franken and left Senate Republicans Meep-Meeping as they ran down the road to tax reform. In the end, the Democratic Party sacrificed one of their most high profile Senators without gaining one square inch of moral high ground.

There should have been an ethics investigation. Unfortunately for Franken, there wasn’t time for any sort of fact-finding or due process; there was only time for politically expedient, angry mob justice.

Franken’s fellow Senate Democrat Joe Manchin said on Politico’s Off- Message Podcast that Franken got “railroaded by fellow Democrats” and that what happened to Franken was “the most hypocritical thing I’ve ever seen done to a human being.”

Franken was railroaded because he got hit with a perfect storm of political opportunism. Franken didn’t resign because he admitted to being guilty. In fact, he maintained his innocence all along saying, “Some of the allegations against me are simply not true. Others I remember very differently.” He didn’t resign the people of Minnesota wanted him to. A recent PPP poll showed that Minnesotans, by an 8 point margin, wanted him to stay— that’s almost his exact margin of victory in the 2014 election. Even if Minnesotans had wanted him ousted, the constitution of Minnesota allows for a recall.

Here are of few of the real reasons that Democrats saw fit to undo an election decided by Minnesota voters:

1. Because Roy Moore was winning in the polls

Democrats can’t seem to stop getting burned by the polls. While a couple polls looked good for Jones, the majority of the showed Moore winning the Alabama special election by 4 to 9 points. Democrats were banking on all those Alabama Republicans getting it wrong. If a majority of the polls had shown Jones winning comfortably, Franken would still be a Senator. But Moore was up, and the inevitable “Republicans hate women” narrative proved too tantalizing to resist.

2. Because Minnesota has a Democrat governor

Anyone believe the Democrats would have demanded Al Franken resign if it meant they’d lose a Senate vote? Anyone believe if a Republican governor was waiting in the wings to replace Al Franken with a Republican Senator that he’d be going anywhere? Of course not! Democrat Governor Mark Dayton is appointing Democrat Lt. Governor and former vice president of public affairs for Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota Tina Smith to a one year term that will end in 2019.

This played a huge role in the cost/benefit analysis of ousting Franken. Without the security of knowing the seat would stay with the party, there’s no way Franken would have been forced out. Certainly not at a time when the Senate is nearly equally divided and the Senate Democrats are facing a 2018 electoral map that has Waterloo written all over it.

3. Because Kristen Gillibrand wants to be president

It wouldn’t surprise me to see Kristen Gillibrand win the nomination in 2020 because she’s absolutely ruthless. Hours after Franken was first accused of sexual misconduct by Leanne Tweeden, Gillibrand told The New York Times that Bill Clinton should have resigned. Phillipe Reines, a former Clinton aide called her out on twitter saying, “Over 20 yrs you took the Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite. Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck.” It’s no coincidence that Senator Gillibrand was later the first to call for Al Franken’s resignation. According to Politico, Gillibrand’s call was “quickly followed by more than two dozen others. The first batch of resignation calls came from female senators, followed by a slew of male Democrats and eventually the majority of the 48-member caucus.”

Not only did Gillibrand seize the opportunity to be a national leader of the #metoo movement by calling for Franken’s resignation, she also took down someone who may have proven a major competitor for the Democratic nomination.

To the ultra-casual or ultra-partisan observer, it may look like the Democrats took a stand against sexual misconduct, but that’s not what happened. What really happened was they vetoed a fair election and destroyed the career of one of their own Senators in a desperate attempt to win a political narrative.

I won’t miss Al Franken and his self-righteous grandstanding, and frankly I don’t believe his denials. But he deserved the chance to prove me and everyone else wrong. His ouster was not justice. Instead, he and the Minnesotans he represented were pawns sacrificed in a Machiavellian political maneuver.

________________________________

Eddie Zipperer is a political science professor at Georgia Military College.



We saw this is true in the way Democrats pulled back after the election and suddenly regretted their rush to judgement on Franken. So much for the moral high ground. There's plenty of evidence of Democrat opportunism on everyone mentioned, that can be used by Republicans in future elections.


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Wonder Boy #1224824 2018-01-06 4:13 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
More partisan accusations. As you may have noticed Franken did resign and yeah a couple of Dems thought he should have waited for the ethics investigation but that is hardly the same as what you are falsely charging.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31


Partisan accusations perhaps, firmly based in clear facts.

Gillibrand DID rise to her Senate seat with the clear help of the Clintons, and took that help eagerly without complaint.

Let me remind you:

 Quote:
Hours after Franken was first accused of sexual misconduct by Leanne Tweeden, Gillibrand told The New York Times that Bill Clinton should have resigned. Phillipe Reines, a former Clinton aide called her out on twitter saying, “Over 20 yrs you took the Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite. Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck.” It’s no coincidence that Senator Gillibrand was later the first to call for Al Franken’s resignation.


Perhaps you'd like to take that up with "partisan" DEMOCRAT Clinton aide Phillipe Reines?

If Republicans did a fraction of the evil stuff Democrats do every day, they'd be driven out of office.

I'm still keeping the faith on eventual justice unleashed on the Clintons.

Wonder Boy #1224827 2018-01-06 7:20 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Get ready for your party to be driven out than. It might take a couple of election cycles but the GOP is drenched in Trump stink.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,009
Likes: 31
You really ought to watch Sean Hannity or Lou Dobbs for a few nights.

The "stink" of Trump is fantastic performance across the board on the economy, unemployment, annual growth, reductions in food stamp use and disability (completely reversing 8 years of increased dependency under Obama), rebuilding the morale and strength of our military, renegotiating trade deals, a strong stance against North Korea that has already made them begin talks again with South Korea for the first time in years, tax reform, increased business and jobs.

And incredibly, a liberal media that bends over backwards to avoid reporting it. DESPITE the success!

AGAIN: I've never seen a president work so hard or achieve so much in just one year. On border security alone, Trump has accomplished more in his first month than I expected from him or any president in 8 years.

The stink is from the corruption of the Democrats.
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Debbi Wasserman BITCH CUNT Schultz, Donna Brazile. The Clinton Foundation's pay-to-play, selling 20% of U.S. uranium to the Russians in exchange for bribes. Clinton's private e-mail server that compromised national security DAILY to the Russians and Chinese by exposing national secrets to hacking. DAILY!
FOR FOUR YEARS!
Rigging the primary for Hillary Clinton and cheating Bernie Sanders (proven by DNC internal e-mails, thank you WikiLeaks.) Rigging TWO TELEVISED Democrat primary debates, where Hillary Clinton knew all the questions in advance. Rigging the FBI investigation of Hillary. On and on.

What the hell do you need to see to admit the DNC is corrupt to the core?!?

There's nothing even close with Donald Trump. The meetings and circumstances where Dems and the liberal media attempt to accuse Trump and his family of "treason" were all rigged that way by the Democrats. The FusionGPS report. The fact that Democrats had allowed Veselnetskaya to be in the country, so she could meet with Trump Jr.
Peter Strzok and Lisa Page talking about rigging the investigation, and setting up an "insurance policy" to cripple the Trump administration if elected!

The Obama administration getting an illegal FISA report to do illegal surveillance on the Trump campaign, and Trump administration EVEN AFTER THE ELECTION!

That "Stink" is not coming from the Trump administration. And I know you're indoctrinated in the MediaMatters/RAW/MSNBC Newspeak version of politics, but really, how could you possibly defend this level of DNC corruption?


  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Wonder Boy #1224830 2018-01-06 11:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,796
Likes: 40
In your mind is Hannity covering things in a nonpartisan unbiased manner?


Fair play!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
If we accept the premise that most news organizations are biased in One Direction or another one might argue that people should watch news from the other perspective.

For example my Amazon echo flash briefing plays five minutes of FOXNews and then five minutes of NPR.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5