Actually that's what you're doing. Israel is now willing to letting one in but it's on the condition that she would just visit her grandmother. She has to keep her mouth shut. And yes Israel does have a law that was never applied to elected US officials before. Israel hasn't and wasn't going to bar American elected officials though until Trump bullied them into changing course. You're the one distorting. You have no defense or excuse for Trump's tweet.
As pointed out here, Israel was not using the law prior to Trump's effort to bully them into barring them. Right after Trump tweeted Israel made it's announcement. At some point do you have a defense for this not being a freedom of speech issue?
Accepting your argument (which I don't, it's anti-Trump spin) how does Israel denying entry into their country by Tlaib (which they did allow, and she defiantly rejected) deny free speech? It's Israeli law and policy, not U.S. policy. And regardless, Tlaib and Omar can bitch all they want, in the United States. It is Tlaaib abd Omar who are denying free speech to Israel, and trying to shut down free speech of Jews in both the U.S. and Israel. It's their country, and the right of U.S. Jews (and Christians like myself) to support Israel without being shouted down, boycotted, divested, sanctioned, or otherwise attacked or intimidated.
But ultimately, Tlaib was never denied access to Israel, she chose not to go. Not Trump's fault, it is Tlaib's that she didn't go to Israel.
It's all just a fake Democrat talking points argument.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
Actually she was denied entry entry than was allowed to visit her grandmother on the condition that's all she would do. That isn't free speech. And that all ignores the other one being denied entry. And you keep ignoring Trump's tweet telling Israel that they would look weak if they allowed them in. He is responsible for what he says correct? And yes Israel can ban who they want but by doing so they take a hit on their democratic values. That's probably why they hadn't previously done so till Trump's tweet.
Oh and don't be mistaken that I'm trying to get you to accept anything. You're drunk on the Kool aid and have made it abundantly clear how you really feel about free speech.
Actually she was denied entry entry than was allowed to visit her grandmother on the condition that's all she would do. That isn't free speech. And that all ignores the other one being denied entry. And you keep ignoring Trump's tweet telling Israel that they would look weak if they allowed them in. He is responsible for what he says correct? And yes Israel can ban who they want but by doing so they take a hit on their democratic values. That's probably why they hadn't previously done so till Trump's tweet.
To me you just confirmed all my points:
* Israel has the right to deny entry to anyone they find allied against or dangerous to their sovereignty. * In accordance with that, Israel denied Tlaib and Omar entrance. * Because Tlaib begged to see her grandmother, Israel compassionately made an exception for her, and continued to deny access to Omar because she is clearly allied against and hostile to Israel. Tlaib basically said "fuck you" to Israel and politically exploited the invitation and postured. * Trump made a Twitter comment that didn't change a thing, those were Israel's laws, before, during and after Trump commented. * Yes, Israel can ban whoever they want, it's their country and their national security. * I see no compromise of Israel's values. They are just keeping people out who are hostile and want to destroy them. Keeping them out keeps them from advancing their cause. * You babble about "free speech" violations, but that make no sense. U.S. free speech rights don't apply to Israel, they don't have a U.S. Constitution, they have an Israeli constitution, so yours is just a lying leftist talking point. Ultimately, Israel is keeping out enemies who want to undermine Israeli sovereignty and security. Even if U.S. "free speech" rights applied, the national interest supersedes alleged free speech. Speech that foments violence, terrorism and revolution is not free speech, it is insurrection. And Israel has every right to protect itself from that, and not enable its enemies.
Oh and don't be mistaken that I'm trying to get you to accept anything. You're drunk on the Kool aid and have made it abundantly clear how you really feel about free speech.
"Drinking the Kool Aid" is a metaphor alluding to the Jonestown mass suicide in Guyana, under the cult of Jim Jones. "Drinking the Kool Aid" is being brainwashed into committing suicide.
The policy you advocate would be suicide for Israel. The policy your party advocates for the U.S. (open borders, admitting all illegals, giving them free healthcare, letting illegals vote --Stacey Abrams let that one out of the bag in 2016-- letting felons vote, racial reparations, the green new deal, hating and undermining police, hating and undermining the military, on and on) that is the path to committing national suicide.
L.A., San Francisco, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, New York City... centers of decades-long Democrat control that are falling apart. Those are the warning signs for what your party would do to the entire nation.
WASHINGTON (SBG) – The Department of Justice this week said it would investigate what it describes as market-leading online platforms. Companies such as Google, Facebook and Amazon would fall into that category. This investigation comes as these big tech companies are also under scrutiny by lawmakers.
In a news release, the DOJ said it would review how these market-leading platforms achieved their market-leading power and if they’re stifling competition, innovation and ultimately hurting consumers.
“Try and assess whether today’s antitrust laws are kind of inadequate for these types of big new tech firms,” said Ryan Bourne, the Chair of Public Understanding of Economics at Cato Institute in Washington, D.C.
He goes on to say that the investigation will be about catching up to technology, proving whether these companies violated antitrust laws and remembering that we’ve seen this before. For example, when Microsoft was accused of violating antitrust laws in the 1990s.
“Capitalism through history has shown even firms that appear incredibly dominant end up getting usurped by new products and new companies,” said Bourne.
The DOJ’s investigation will focus on the antitrust side of these online platforms, but Congress is looking into other aspects of these companies. That includes looking into whether there is political bias when it comes to algorithms and search engines.
Lawmakers have already been talking about this on Capitol Hill.
“Study after study has debunked suggestions of political bias,” said Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, during a July 16 hearing.
“Big tech’s favorite defense is it wasn’t me, the algorithms did it,” said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas during that same hearing.
Lawmakers, such as Sen. Cruz, have highlighted examples of bias, referencing videos released by the right-leaning watchdog group, Project Veritas. In its latest video, Project Veritas said it interviewed a senior software engineer with Google. The employee, Greg Coppola, said that while he does not have a smoking gun, there is political bias at Google and that it is reflected in the search engine.
“I really don’t buy the idea that big tech is politically neutral,” said Coppola in the Project Veritas interview, “I just know how algorithms are, they don’t write themselves. We write them to do what we want them to do.”
Meantime, this DOJ investigation comes as the Federal Trade Commission imposes a five-billion-dollar penalty on Facebook. The FTC said Facebook violated a 2012 order by deceiving users about privacy control. Facebook will also have to restructure its approach to privacy from the top down. In a press release, Facebook said explains that the FTC investigation was sparked by the events around Cambridge Analytica last year.
We reached out to Google, Facebook and Amazon for comment on the DOJ investigation. As of this writing, we have not heard back. We also reached out to Google for comment on the interview by one of their engineers, we also have not heard back. We also reached out to Coppola and were able to speak to him by phone. He confirms the information he shared in that online interview and said that he has since been put on administrative leave by Google.
God bless William Barr. He's done an incredible amount since he became Attorney General such a short time ago on Feb 15th. Sessions would still be sitting on his hands. Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder would be drawing pentagrams on the floor in children's blood and dedicating their souls and the DOJ to Satan. They pretty much were, up till the day they left office.
Dr. Robert Epstein, testifying before the U.S. Senate about his research on the tech industry, how they manipulated more than enough votes to give Hillary Clinton the popular vote in 2016 (while still losing the electoral vote). And have the potential to manipulate 15 million votes in the 2020 election
Questioning Google’s vice president for government affairs and public policy, Karan Bhatia. Senator Hawley is the only legislator I'm aware of with a bill on the table to reign in the excesses of tech-giant supremacy.
Ted Cruz, confronting Google executives with VIDEOTAPED self-incriminating comments BOASTING about their SYSTEMATIC shadow-banning and other suppression of conservatives on Twitter and Youtube.
Some of the people shadow-banned include Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) Whose account was shadow-banned when she announced her candidacy for Senator ! (Wikipedia selectively omits the part about Twitter shadow-banning her account to suppress her support. And also leaves out the part about Project Veritas exposing her Democrat opponent (Bredeson) as a double-talking supporter of the Democrat far-left, lying to his voters, telling voters that he will do the opposite of what he truly will if elected, as exposed in videotaped comments by multiple officials and volunteers in his campaign. Rather significant omissions of truly scary deception, while protraying Blackburn as right-wing and scary. An example of social media tech giants working in concert and on multiple fronts to suppress the facts inconvenient to their side.)
The shadow-baanning of Blackburn's account was only reversed because it was publicly exposed. She ultimately won her race and became Senator anyway.
Similar shadow-banning has occurred of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Rep Mark Meadows(R-NC), and Rep. Gaetz (R-FL), the core of the Freedom Caucus supporting Trump. Jim Jordan, no one too important, just a challenger who could have become House speaker a year ago! It's obscene abuse of power by Youtube, Twitter and Facebook.
Published on Dec 11, 2018 Lawmakers questioned Google's CEO Sundar Pichai for over three hours, looking for answers on alleged anti-conservative bias, plans for a censored search engine for China, and data collection.
This is the CEO of Google, who one of his executives said in internal e-mail to other executives was personally manipulating voter turnout in key battleground states including California and Texas.
In addition to non-cooperation with the United States government, while simultaneously assisting authoritarian suppression in China of its citizens.
13 people uploaded Ingraham's program in its entirety. Every one of them, as well as other Fox News programs that came up in the search list, all blanked out to 2 seconds. Technically still there, but in fact deleted. Every day, Youtube wipes out virtually all conservative facts, allowing only the liberal side, the liberal propaganda and lies, to be heard. With no counterbalance, weighing of the facts, or debate. When I attempted to cite counterbalancing facts, I was deleted as a user.
The hashtag #FireGinaCarano resurfaced in February 2021 after Carano shared a post on Instagram comparing American conservatives to Jews in Nazi Germany.[5][7] According to the Washington Post, Carano's post said: "Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors – even by children. Because history is edited, most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews," and, "How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?".[5]
In response, Lucasfilm stated that Carano was no longer employed by them and would not appear in any future Star Wars projects, citing the social media posts which they said "denigrat[ed] people based on their cultural and religious identities".[6][7] That same day, Carano was dropped by talent agency UTA due to the controversy.[7][73][74] Conservatives on social media responded to the firing with the hashtag #CancelDisneyPlus.[75]
The ironies just pile up. She warns about organized political hatred, describing what happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany as a terrifying thing, that is now being repeated in the U.S., and then... is accused of "hate speech", and her Disney contract torn up because she allegedly posted hateful anti-semitic remarks?!?
Only a Democrat zealot could rationalize this as somehow right.
Interesting that she independently came up with the same comparison I did 6 or 8 years ago, when I said that "Republicans are the scapegoated Jews in Obama's Germany". Although that persecution has intensiied since then, particularly in the last 30 days.
This simultaneous post by her co-star Pedro Pascal, un-punished by Disney, further underscores Disney's one-sided hypocrisy:
“Pedro Pascal, who plays the Mandalorian on Disney Plus, was not fired for this post on Instagram comparing Trump supporters to Nazis and Confederates,” [in a meme by Pascal re-tweeted by] one frustrated critic.
This follow up post after said it quite well:
Quote
Shreddie Guerrero @El_Rey_De_Iowa · For those keeping score: Dehumanize millions and you get to keep your job. Attempt to humanize millions and you will lose it. That’s LucasFilm’s standard.
Trump had another rally speech last night in Florence, South Carolina (Saturday, March 12 2022, from roughly 7PM to 8)
I missed the opening minutes before I arrived home, and looked for it online in a DuckDuckGo search. There are literally dozens of links to the full video of it posted on Youtube, but every one of them you click on has a blank screen that says: "Deleted by the uploader" (i.e., deleted by Youtube, censored, suppressed).
I went to Bitchute, and did a search for "Trump rally South Carolina" and easily found this:
So... why doesn't it show up in the DuckDuckGo search engine ? It looks like not only Google, but also DuckDuckGo has now turned to censorship of conservative news and Trump coverage. I've noticed this on multiple DuckDuckGo searches on various subjects in recent months. Only if I go diectly to Breitbart.com or Townhall.com, or Fox News or Newsmax, or DailyCaller or any number of conservative news sites and search directly on their site, will I find what I'm looking for, that DOESN'T show up in a search engine.
That is Orwellian censorship of information from public view, to indocrinate the masses with a pre-selected false narrative, to the exclusion of all other information.
Even as they promote a PROVEN false narrative on any number of issues. I realized recently that the mainstream media daily reinforces narratives on a number of fronts, that have already been verified as completely false.
Such as:
1) The false narrative that Covid-19 could NOT have emerged from a Wuhan lab. That it's "tin-foil hat conspiracy theory" to even ask the question. Despite that's where multiple leading virologists say the evidence clearly leads. Including the FOIA'd and published private e-mails exchanged with Antony Fauci by these same scientists, saying precisely that to Fauci himself. These e-mails also reveal the false narrative Fauci created, and Fauci thanking some of these scientists for helping create this false narrative of the wet-market origin of the virus. But Facebook and Twiiter still block the posts of doctors, scientists and journalists who publish this evidence on their social media sites.
2) The false narrative that PPE masks prevent Covid-19. No, they clearly don't. But again, Fauci was early on initially saying it's silly to use PPE masks, then he flipped in May 2020 and admitted he lied to prevent the public from buying up all PPE , that would have left hospitals in short supply. And then Fauci suddenly flipped again, and mandated that everyone in the country suddenly >> had << to wear them. A recent Johns Hopkins study of 20 countries, including the U.S., showed that masks in nations worldwide were 0.2% effective, at best ! But many businesses still mandate they must be used, and criticizing masks as ineffective will still get a person's posts deleted from Facebook, Twitter and other sites. I saw a doctor who posted criticism in the last month interviewed on Fox, after his professional medical posts were deleted.
3) The false narrative that vaccination prevents Covid-19. In truth, even if vaccinated, one can still get Covid. And can still infect others with Covid. But again, posts on Facebook and Twitter saying this, even by doctors, are blocked and deleted.
4) The false narrative that there is no evidence the November 3 2020 election was rigged. There is tons of evidence at this point, suppressed by the mainstream media and social media, and search engines.
5) The false narrative that there was an "insurrection" by Trump supporters on Jan 6 2021. Of the over 100,000 who peacefully protested, only 600 entered the Capitol, and of those only about 60 were charged with vandalism or violence. At least 20 of those 60 were John Earle Sullivan and his Antifa group, all self-identified in their "Jayden X" videos posted all over the internet, openly boasting they were only dressed as Trump supporters, to frame Trumpers for their own (Antifa) bad acts. And another "at least 20" of those 60 were "un-indicted co-conspirator" FBI agents, according to the FBI's own investigation reports of Jan 6th events. Ray Epps and others clearly identified but not charged by the FBI. Jill Sanborn, assistant FBI director of counter-terrorism, leading the investigation, refused to discuss Ray Epps, or whether FBI agents were present on Jan 6th, refused to answer if these FBI agents either led, instigated or participated in violence. Because that would incriminate the FBI to answer. So again, if at least 40 of that 60, a clear majority, were agents of FBI and Antifa, there to frame Trump supporters, it clearly is not Trump supporters who led or orchestrated events of Jan 6th, at most only included a few duped Trump supporters. But print and broadcast media and social media still front that lying narrative, and suppress evidence that Trump supporters were framed, and supress evidence Trump supporters are being maliciously prosecuted by DOJ/FBI.
6) Similarly, the false narrative of a "right-wing white supremacist" plot to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, manufactured, led and orchestrated by the FBI. A majority of the conspirators, now numbering 12 identified FBI informants and agents revealed, including the kidnap planner and the van driver, ARE FBI AGENTS. The others indicted were dupes who were tricked into minimal participation, by a "97% Democrat-donating FBI, a KGB army of Peter Strzoks and Lisa Pages, manufacturing a Democrat narrative, just to support their fake menace of an "extremist white nationalism" threat to the country. The exculpatory evidence reported in conservative media, but suppressed by mainstream liberal media and social media.
7) the "Russia Hoax" Democrat narrative, that Trump colluded with the Russians to rig and win the 2016 election. Despite the narrative having been fully investigated and disproven as completely false, reporters at the New York Times and Washington Post still keep their Pulitzer prizes for a false narrative, for reporting that has been proven to be absolutely not true. But the false narratives remain unchallenged on Facebook and Twitter. While Trump, who was wronged, is still blocked from posting or responding with any challenge to that false narrative.
And more, but you get the point.
Such as multiple narratives coming out of the Ukraine invasion over the last few weeks, that have already been proven to be false. But they still are continued in broadcast and social media, as if they were true. OAN cited multiple false reports: https://www.oann.com/did-biden-instigate-the-russian-war-in-ukraine/
All of these false narratives have been out there for months, reinforced day after day with reports in mainstream media and social media, despite the clear untruths exposed. And any attempts to reveal the facts contradicting these narratives suppressed and buried, user accounts frozen or deleted, even the account of the New York Post detailing the facts that authenticated Hunter Biden's laptop and e-mails, right before the election. How are these narratives any different from the propaganda broadcast in Russia, China, North Korea or Iran? And did you ever imagine, even just a few years ago, this would ever happen in the United States?
Probably the most important Orwell Ministry of Truth omission by Youtube, Google, Facebook and Twiiter is Trump's Jan 6 2021 speech, that was used as House Democrats' fraudulent pretense for a second Trump impeachment, alleging President Trump "incited" the "storming of the Capitol", and further calling this tiny event an "insurrection".
You would think that Google, Youtube, Facebook and Twitter would make that important Jan 6th Trump speech easily available online, to make the case to the American public, and the world, that Trump was responsible, in his own self-incriminating words, IF they were actually self-incriminating. But no, they have deleted or filtered out every video-posting of the full speech, and rigged algorithms to filter out any potential word-search to Google it up.
Even DuckDuckGo search engine makes it near impossible to find.
I found it by going to Bitchute.com and doing a search on that site, invisible on a search engine, only accessible directly on Bitchute :
But if you go on Google or Youtube, Facebook or Twitter, you can't see the entire speech to see what President Trump ACTUALLY SAID that day in his 70-minute speech to allegedly "incite". However, you can find several hundred news clips and liberal news pundits telling the audience how Trump "incited" the mob to violence, selling that narrative, WITHOUT ever showing the clips of the speech to show what Trump ACTUALLY SAID. And they never will, because Trump never said it. So they have to hide what Trump actually said, to sell that lying narrative.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
“Today, we will see whether Republicans stand strong for integrity of our elections.... whether or not they stand strong for our country...
Trump also made multiple Twitter posts throughout the afternoon, urging his supporters to "remain peaceful". When he became aware of a few violent incidents inside the Capitol, he prepared a one-minute video he posted on Twitter, urging everyone to "...leave in peace, go home." :
Originally Posted by President Donald J. Trump
Jan 6 2021 I know your pain, I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt.
It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened where they could take it away from all of us — from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. [That last part talking about FBI, DOJ, the liberal media, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and Google giving a free pass to Democrats and the political Left, such as BLM and Antifa. --WB]
I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
At no point, except in Democrat/media fake narrative, did Trump in his words or actions "incite" violence that day. * In his request for 20,000 National Guard troops days in advance, to prevent violence (a request blocked by Pelosi and other Democrats, never forced by the media or investigators to explain why) , * in President Trump's 70-minute speech on Jan 6th, clearly instructing demonstrators "peacefully and patriotically voice your support" for Republican Senate and House members inside the Capitol who were lawfully challenging the electoral vote by Constitutional procedure, to delay the electoral count and and push for 2 or 3 weeks of joint session debate of the evidence of election fraud by Democrats. * in President Trump's Twitter posts throughout the afternoon roughly every 30 minutes, constantly instructing his supporters in texts to remain peaceful, * in his final 1-minute video exhortation, about 5 PM, commanding protesters to "leave in peace" and go home.
Trump encouraged peaceful and lawful protest at every stage. And yet Trump was maliciously framed for a second fake impeachment by House Democrats, just because they had the majority votes to do it, not based on any evidence.
According to reporter Jack Posobiec who reported from the Capitol that day, who has literally covered hundreds of protests, both peaceful ones and violent ones: Both he and the police he spoke to observing the protests estimated there were "over 100,000 protesters" that day. He showed video footage on OAN from the roofs of the Capitol and neighboring buildings, panning across the crowd, extending beyond the horizon in every direction, to verify that point. Of that 100,000, only 600 went inside the Capitol on Jan 6th. Of those, 90% were only guilty of "trespassing".
Only 60 committed vandalism or other violence. And of those 60, "at least 20" (by the FBI's own reports) are "un-indicted co-conspirators" (FBI agents) and another 20 are John Earle Sullivan and his BLM/Antifa rioters, DISGUISED as Trump supporters, openly boasting ON VIDEO they were going to frame Trump supporters. Outside the 60 cited for violence or vandalism or theft of items, or urinating on a desk, of the 90% of others who were only cited for trespassing, it is very possible that because of Ray Epps and other FBI agents moving away barricades before they arrived, they never knew they had wandered into a previously restricted and barricaded area.
We know now that the main people pulling down fences and inciting violence, at least 40 of the 60, were "un-indicted co-conspirators"/FBI agents, and Antifa/BLM agents, the overwhelming majority pushing violence and vandalism were NOT Trump supporters, but those trying to set them up. So if an overwhelming majority of the 60 perpetrators of vandalism and violence were NOT Trump supporters, were in fact FBI and Antifa there on a mission to frame Trump and his supporters, can it fairly be said that this violence was organized and led by Trump supporters, or that Trump "incited" it?
No. No, it can't. And that Democrat narrative falls apart a little more every day, as more facts steadily come to light.
Now that it doesn't matter, and the Biden administration has failed to the point that we're at the brink of nuclear war with Russia, due to the Ukraine invasion that Biden's inaction and weakness emboldened Russia to pull off... NOW the New York Times admits that Hunter Biden's laptop and the self-incriminating posts on it were real all along. If not censored from social media in Oct-Nov 2020 and propagandized as "Russian disinformation", Joe Biden would not be president now to destroy the world.
U.S. government leaders, taking Zelensky's Ukraine government use of a Russian invasion as a pretext to shut down all political and media opposition, and calling that "the ultimate example of Democracy". Both Democrat and Republican leaders !
Because THEY would like to do the same to consolidate absolute power in their own countries. And have to a large extent already. In the last 2 years of Covid-19 lockdown policies ,and increasingly in recent months, we've seen growing over-reaches by "democracies" worldwide. From the U.S., to Germany, to Austria, to Belgium, to Australia, New Zealand and Canada. That while all these nations are still touted as democracies, they increasingly exert authoritarian power to suppress protest and dissent, in ways more like those of communist China, or... well... Ukraine.
While still self-congratulating themselves as democracies, while condemning authoritarian abuses and human rights abuses in China or Russia, many of these nations, the U.S. included, have increasingly emulated these authoritarian tactics. In the last few months, I've seen corporate CEO's like the head of Disney, and Bill Gates, express their admiration for the China government's ability to "get things done more efficiently" than messy inefficient democracies. Well, they "get things done" through intimidation and exertion of absolute power. And more so the Democrats, but also many establishment Republicans, are pushing to sidestep Constitutional rule of law in the U.S. And similarly in other "free" nations, by sidestepping democracy and exerting a similar absolute authoritarian power. It's terrifying that the elites in our own nations admire and emulate the authoritarian over-reach of the Chinese Communist Party, and increasingly exert the same powers in western nations.
On a side note, castrating captured Russian POW's... wow...
I initially went to this Twitter post for the hilarious Rambo-ized painting of Reagan and Bonzo from the 1951 movie. But the Twitter comments by some very prominent names (Rep Tulsi Gabbard, Jack Posobiec, Glenn Greenwald, etc.) about Elon Musk's purchasing Twitter stock to become the largest shareholder, and pressuring Twitter with that influence to stop abusing their power to censor conservatives, is an inspiring and almost instant reigning in of liberal authoritarian abuse at Twitter.
Granted, only reigning in one of many far-Left owned tech companies indulging in this kind of abuse and censorship. But a step in the right direction, possibly lighting the way to reign in the others as well.
OAN was taken off the air by Direct TV (at the order of parent company A T & T) .
A similar "de-platforming" of Fox News was attempted by the Obama administration, and at that time, all other news media sided with Fox News to keep Fox News included in the White House press corps briefings. I was watching OAN at the moment it went off the air, which was at 11:59 PM Monday, April 4th. At 12 midnight one minute later, Tuesday, OAN was off the air.
Simultaneously, Newsmax also was taken off the air at the same time, just snow on the screen, and after a few minutes replaced by a message of "We are experiencing technical difficulties", and came back on the air about an hour later. An accident by Direct TV? Or a warning to Newsmax, how close it is to a similar instant de-platforming ?
...details the exact circumstances of OAN's origins in 2013 (at the urging of A T & T !) their rise over the last 9 years to become the 24th most watched, and obviously profitable, cable channel on Direct TV. More than CNN, more than Bloomberg News. More than CNBC. Yet they remain on Direct TV, and OAN is removed. And the case briefing lists the chronology of events, and specifically what executives at A T & T and Direct TV were instrumental in illicitly taking OAN off the air, and the legal damages sued for, at over $1 billion, for breach of contract, defamation of OAN and its owners, and lost revenue. Despite being 24th of Direct TV's most profitable stations, for no clearly explained reason other than liberal Bolshevisim and de-platforming a dissenting political persuader of public opinion, its removal from Direct TV's stations is actually decreasing Direct TV and A T & T's profits and stock shareholders' profits, in what were increasingly viewed channels (OAN and AWE), that were increasing in profits for both Direct TV / A T &T, and for OAN, when the plug was maliciously pulled, for no clearly explained reason.
Most astonishing is (unlike when the Obama administration tried to exclude Fox News as "not a real news channel") I've seen absolutely no mention of the very sudden cancellation and silencing of OAN, even by Fox News and Newsmax. And as the above legal case makes clear, the same liberal groups like the NAACP and Media Matters, have the exact same de-platforming plans for Fox News and Newsmax.
The authoritarian silencing of all dissenting (conservative, and independent) news and opinion. You'd think someone would want to sound the alarm and report that, before their networks suffer the same fate as OAN.
First they came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up. --Pastor Martin Niemoller
Something that you might have noticed is that when GOP-controlled state legislatures go about setting congressional districts in a manner that benefits Republicans, well, the radical left in this country screams and hollers that this is gerrymandering and disenfranchisement among other things. However, when folks in the Democratic Party participate in the very same kind of activity, no matter how badly it’s done, well, to them that’s just redistricting. It’s no biggie.
And that, dear readers, is likely how the Democrats who are in control of both the House and the Senate, along with the White House are likely planning to try and rig the 2022 midterm elections in their favor so that they do not lose control. That’s what the whole mess with the 2020 presidential election was really about. If they could manage to pull off massive voter fraud, if they could end up getting away with it on a national scale, they could pull out all of the stops and prevent fair elections from ever happening again, ensuring they stay in power indefinitely.
In other words, goodnight America.
A report from Western Journal talks all about the left’s new strategy for trying to rig the election in their favor, saying, “And, if you’re the type that gets outraged at nakedly cynical redistricting, egregious is the only word that can be used for the map New York state Democrats have drawn up. While the state currently has 19 Democrat representatives and eight Republicans in the House of Representatives, the new map will have 20 Democrat-leaning seats, four Republican-leaning seats and only two competitive districts, according to an analysis by FiveThirtyEight.”
This is a pretty solid way to ensure that Nancy Pelosi stays in as House Speaker, especially since New York is a Democratic Party stronghold. “While the Democrats are protesting maps drawn up by Republican legislatures, even taking states like Alabama to court, this is what passes muster with them. This is the kind of hypocrisy we highlight here at The Western Journal — the kind the media doesn’t like to cover. You can help us by joining the fight as a member of The Western Journal today,” the report stated.
On Wednesday, FiveThirtyEight put out a report that the state legislature passed a map “designed to give Democrats a huge advantage in the state,” which ended up losing a seat in reapportionment because of the 2020 census. “The proposed map has an efficiency gap of D+9, but that understates how severely it would tilt the playing field toward Democrats,” FiveThirtyEight said in its report.
BREAKING: here is NY Dems' full congressional proposal, courtesy of @zach_solomon1. This is a 22D-4R gerrymander – and a pretty effective one. https://t.co/QleEKPMJy8 pic.twitter.com/yd7Iqx6DPh — Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) January 30, 2022
Not only did this create the 20-to-4 breakdown of safe seats for the Democrats and Republicans, the two “competitive seats” as they are called, are both now advantageous to the left.
“This is an increase of three Democratic-leaning seats, a decrease of three Republican-leaning seats and a decrease of one highly competitive seat from the old map,” the outlet continued.
“If the map is enacted, it would likely set up Democrats to flip the open Republican-held 1st and 22nd districts, as well as Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis’s 11th District. GOP Rep. Claudia Tenney would also be thrown into a competitive race against Democratic Rep. Antonio Delgado in the new 19th District,” the report said.
Conservative news outlet The Daily Wire also reported that Tenney announced Monday that she would be running to “represent the newly drawn New York’s 23rd Congressional District in Congress.” As she posted on Twitter :
We are officially announcing our campaign for #NY23 this year! I look forward to meeting and earning the support of even more New Yorkers and getting to work for our region in Congress. pic.twitter.com/NlTfQKizFJ — Claudia Tenney (@claudiatenney) January 31, 2022
The state of New York is supposed to have a bipartisan redistricting process. This whole thing right here proves that it’s not functioning the way it was intended.
“Such an egregiously biased map was only possible because of the weakness of New York’s new bipartisan redistricting commission,” FiveThirtyEight went on to say in its report. “Under state law, the legislature may simply draw its own map after rejecting the commission’s first two proposals.”
For FiveThirtyEight to use the word “egregious” here should really tell you how awful this is, especially because this publication is not known for being very conservative.
“It’s not just New York’s Democrat-leaning gerrymandering that could help Pelosi, either. The Washington Post — again, not a bastion of Republican sympathies — reported earlier this week that ‘in more than two dozen maps passed around the country, Democrats would net an additional five districts that Joe Biden would have won in 2020,'” the report from WJ said.
But remember, folks, it’s the GOP’s “gerrymandering” that’s the real issue.
“New York state Republicans were looking at challenging the map in court. In a statement, state GOP Chairman Nick Langworthy said it was a “brazen and outrageous attempt at rigging the election to keep Nancy Pelosi as speaker,” a report from the New York Post said.
“Democrats are circumventing the will of the people,” Langworthy remarked. “For all of their phony protestations about transparency and fairness in elections, what they’re doing is textbook filthy, partisan gerrymandering that is clearly in violation of the New York State Constitution.”
“We are reviewing all of our legal options to protect the voices of millions of New Yorkers,” he added.
If that doesn’t work, it could end up bringing Pelosi just a tad bit closer to keeping speakership after the midterms despite a wave of discontent with both Joe Biden and his administration, along with congressional Democrats.
And we most definitely don’t want that.
That's in addition to Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, TikTok, Apple, And the mainstream liberal print and broadcast media grinding their elbow into tipping the scales of every check and balance of our constitutional government and election system.
Democrats can never logically explain how Joe Biden won the 2020 election, in a campaign that should have been an overwhelming Republican victory in Nov 2020, comparable to Republican victories in the Nov 1972, and Nov 1984 elections. Even by the rigged Democrat official 2020 vote tally, Trump won 74,216,154 , more than 11 million votes greater than his 62,984,828 total for 2016.
There is no explanation of where Biden's 81,268,924 million votes came from in 2020, pulled out a magic hat. Clear election fraud. Biden couldn't draw 100 people to any of his election rallies. It makes no sense. There is no logical explanation given. And to even ask is labelled "violent white racist extremism" and "insurrection", despite that Democrats in 2000, 2004 and 2016 challenged EVERY ELECTION THEY DIDN'T WIN FOR 20 YEARS they didn't win, with ZERO evidence of election fraud.
Despite that TWO DEMOCRAT 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CANDIDATES (Sen Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, along with Sen Ron Wyden) submitted legislation before congress to investigate the vulnerability of our election system, and specifically the vulnerability of Dominion Voting Systems. Despite that CNN aired a news report (easily found re-broadcast on OAN) in 2017 on the easy hackability of Dominion's voting machines.
Despite the hyper-partisanship and Democrat allegiance of virtually every Dominion employee to the Democrats, open activism of many key Dominion employees in BLM, Antifa, the Clinton Foundation, and other Liberal?Democrat/Leftist activism, and the director of Dominion voting systems security Eric Coomer saying in an online zoom meeting "Trump isn't going to win [in 2020], I made fucking sure of that." Among other vitriol on Coomer's social media directed at Trump and Republicans. The head person in charge of guarding neutrality and security of Dominion's voting machines ! All scrubbed away on EVERY Dominion employee's social media account after the election, so incriminating is the evidence.
But Democrats continue to insist there's no evidence of election fraud, no need to investigate. Scout's honor ! And to investigate or even question the election's integrity is treason ! Despite that Democrats have challenged every election for 20 years. But Republicans can't do the same, can't re-count the ballots and the integrity of how the ballots were counted, despite that the ballots are held for 22 months >>BY LAW f<< for precisely that purpose..
And now the Democrats are working overtime to rig Nov 2022 as well.
Posted here from Rumble, Trump is de-platformed on Google's search engine, Youtube, Facebook and (for now) Twitter. OAN has also been taken off of Direct TV by parent company A T & T (as of May 7th), and A T & T as a result is the subject of a 36 page lawsuit in the billions by OAN, for breach of contract against OAN, and other legal offenses.
Fox News also has turned against Trump since Nov 2020. There are anchors and opinions on Fox News that are pro-Trump, but many others, and especially at the executive level (Paul Ryan, to name one), they are anti-Trump and part of the swamp establishment.
So now only Newsmax carries Trump's rallies live and replays them, and Rumble and Vimeo online. And (by subscription now), no longer on Direct TV) on OAN. And while not on Youtube, video of Trump rallies can be seen on Bitchute, Rumble, and Vimeo video sites. As I said before, if you do a search on Google.com or DuckDuckGo.com the videos will not show up. You have to directly go to Bitchute, Vimeo, or Rumble, and search directly on their sites, or you would never find them on a search engine.
I've seen writers and editors for each of these sites interviewed over the last 24 months, and where they used to get a fair amount of traffic to their sites in the tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands monthly, they now complain that in the months leading up to Nov 2020 and since, that traffic from searches has completely disappeared. While still in business, they are operating at a loss and slowly being bankrupted by the exclusion. The traffic to their sites has moved to zero traffic from search engines. Their visibility has moved to zero through manipulations of Google, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and other dominant (liberal) search engines and social media algorithms. And likewise, any negative news about Biden is minimized or completely ignored and buried by the mainstream broadcast and print media.
And as is made clear in this 36-page lawsuit filed by OAN against Direct TV and Parent company A T & T ... https://www.oann.com/wp-content/upl...cTV_and_ATT_Chairman_William_Kennard.pdf ...the de-platforming of OAN from cable service providers, is the clearly stated liberal-Bolshevik plan for Newsmax and Fox News as well
Why this is not a major story on both Newsmax and Fox is a mystery to me. Their existence is clearly threatened as well. And that malicious intent is repeated by the DHS's new Soros-nurtured Ministry of Truth director Nina Jankowicz, the self-described Mary Poppins of censoring free speech. Stated as a goal by her, to de-platform both Fox and Newsmax, stated repeatedly, long before her DHS Ministry of Truth appointment. https://www.foxnews.com/media/disinformation-board-biden-ministry-of-truth-buck-sexton.
Multiple agencies in President Biden's administration coordinated with social media platforms to censor and suppress posts about COVID-19 they deemed misinformation, according to legal filings from state attorneys general.
Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry have filed a request to compel the Department of Justice to turn over all relevant communications between the White House, Department of State and the FBI with social media companies. The attorneys general have already gotten access to some communications that they say show administration officials pressuring Facebook and Twitter.
One email from a Facebook official to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy said, "I know our teams met today to better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward."
A week later, the Facebook official told the Department of Health and Human Services about how many posts and profiles had been deleted.
"[W]e removed 17 additional Pages, Groups and Instagram accounts tied to the disinfo dozen (so a total of 39 Profiles, Pages, Groups and IG accounts deleted thus far, resulting in every member of the disinfo dozen having had at least one such entity removed)," the Facebook official wrote, according to the emails released by Schmitt and Landry. "We also expanded the group of false claims that we remove to keep up with recent trends of misinformation that we are seeing."
Schmitt continued, "We have already received a number of documents that clearly prove that the federal government has an incestuous relationship with social media companies and clearly coordinate to censor freedom of speech, but we’re not done."
[ scanned redacted documents in case shown at link ]
"The discovery provided so far demonstrates that this Censorship Enterprise is extremely broad, including officials in the White House, HHS, DHS, CISA, the CDC, NIAID, and the Office of the Surgeon General; and evidently other agencies as well, such as the Census Bureau, the FDA, the FBI, the State Department, the Treasury Department, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission," Schmitt and Landry said. "And it rises to the highest levels of the U.S. Government, including numerous White House officials."
Social media giants are being scrutinized from multiple angles, with the GOP members of the House of Representatives making serious demands of Facebook for accountability.
House Republicans are demanding social media juggernaut Facebook preserves all communications with the FBI leading up to the 2020 presidential election.
GOP members of the House oversight and judiciary committees announced Thursday via an open letter that Facebook has failed to provide "complete responses" to concerns over their handling of the infamous Hunter Biden laptop.
The Republicans are now telling Facebook to keep all records of their contact with the FBI.
The weaponized Democrat-loyalist idealogues set up across multiple federal agencies under the Obama administration, continued their partisan authoritarian war on the American people during the Trump and now Biden administrations. During Trump's presidency, often disobeying direct orders by Trump himself or cabinet heads, dragging or stonewalling action, to benefit the Democrat-Bolshevik party.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted on Thursday that an FBI warning was behind Facebook’s decision to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 election. A poll in the wake of the election showed 16 percent of Biden voters would have changed their vote if they knew about the scandal.
During an appearance on the popular podcast “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Zuckerberg told host Joe Rogan that the FBI warned Facebook about “Russian propaganda,” telling the tech giant to “be vigilant” in the weeks leading up to the 2020 presidential election.
“The background here is the FBI basically came to us, some folks on our team, and was, like, ‘Hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. … We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. We have it on notice that basically, there’s about to be some kind of dump that’s similar to that. So just be vigilant,'” Zuckerberg said.
“If something is reported to us as potentially misinformation, important misinformation … we also visit third-party fact-checking programs because we don’t want to be deciding what’s true and false,” he added. “For the, I think it was, five or seven days when it was basically being determined whether it was false, the distribution [of the Hunter Biden laptop story] on Facebook was decreased.” Zuckerberg noted that users were still allowed to share the story, but said Facebook’s interference made it “so fewer people saw it than would have otherwise.”
When asked how much the distribution was reduced, Zuckerberg said, “It’s meaningful.”
“We just kind of thought, hey, look, if the FBI, which I still view as a legitimate institution in this country, it’s like very professional law enforcement, they come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something, then I want to take that seriously,” Zuckerberg said.
Rogan then asked Zuckerberg if the FBI specifically asked Facebook to be “on guard” about the Hunter Biden laptop story.
“I don’t remember if it was that specifically, but it basically fit the pattern,” Zuckerberg replied.
Zuckerberg’s admission adds weight to concerns that the FBI interfered in the 2020 presidential election to reduce negative coverage of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. According to “highly credible” whistleblowers who spoke to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the FBI had a “scheme” to cover up negative information about criminal activity involving President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, before the 2020 presidential election,
In a July 25 letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, Sen. Grassley revealed that “highly credible” whistleblowers alleged the FBI falsely portrayed “derogatory information relating to Hunter Biden” as “disinformation.”
Grassley wrote that the FBI allegedly developed information regarding Hunter Biden’s “criminal financial and related activity” in 2020, but in August of that year – just three months before the presidential election involving his father Joe Biden – an FBI Headquarters team used an internal assessment by FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten to “improperly discredit negative Hunter Biden information as disinformation.”
According to a Media Research Center poll conducted in the immediate aftermath of the 2020 election, 16 percent of Biden voters said they would not have voted for Biden if they had known about the FBI’s investigation into the Biden family – meaning the public’s awareness of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would likely have changed the outcome of the election.
So basically, it rigged the election. Trump would have won if not for Facebook. And multiple other forms of election cheating in Nov 2020, such as Dominion voting machines, hundreds of thousands of fake mail-in ballots, massive rigging of votes in the Atlanta and Detroit election vote-counting centers, in both cities caught on camera pulling in massive boxes fake ballots, in addition to sending home Republican vote observers with the lie that vote counting was ended for the evening, ballot harvesting in retirement homes to rig their votes, mailing in ballots in the names of people who usually don't vote, out of state fake voters, ballots in the names of dead people, Pennsylvania illegally changing voter laws at the last minute, on and on. Multiple streams of election fraud.
In the case of this particular story, weaponizing federal agencies against the voters, to manipulate the outcome.
But the FBI would never actually use this software to spy on U.S. citizens. Scouts' honor !
The way the FBI would never set up 3 guys for the fake Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping sting, using 12 federal agents to recruit and trap the 3 guys, where the FBI created the entire plan and the getaway van, and the 3 guys never would have ever done anything if the FBI hadn't tricked them into joining the plot. The way the FBI tricked Randy Weaver to commit a gun crime violation, to force Weaver to be an FBI informant to avoid jail, and then made his life a living hell for no real reason when he wouldn't cooperate.
The way the FBI created multiple fake investigations, fake Russian "assets", moles to infiltrate Trump's 2016 campaign, the way the FBI falsified evidence against campaign aide Carter Page, and presented false evidence to a federal judge to get four consecutive illegal FISA warrants to spy on Carter Page, and through Page, surveillance on the entire campaign staff. The way the FBI tried to smear and destroy Trump's presidential campaign, and then failing in that, spent 4 years using their power to illegally cripple and topple his presidency. And are still throwing fake indictments and allegations at Trump, to try to prevent him from successfully running for president again in 2024.
Yeah, the FBI would never abuse their power or new technology to spy on U.S. citizens....
Liars exposed, shamelessly continue their deceitful narrative. And the at least 80% mainstream liberal media (up to 100% rabidly anti-Trump since the first impeachment in Jan 2020 and going forward) doesn't even cover the exposed true facts that ruin their liberal propaganda narrative.
If you want the FACTS, you have to go to Fox News, Newsmax, Bereitbart, Daily Caller, The Federalist, Washington Times, TownHall, or some other conservative media source, because George Orwell's liberal media absolutely refuses to report the truth. And needless to say, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Google, Youtube, and Apple are likewise suppressing the undeniable facts.
Likewise the facts regarding Twitter's suppression of these facts, at the direction and collusion of the FBI.
Likewise the false narrative about the true science regarding Covid-19 and the scientists suppressed for 2 years from discosing the true science regarding Covid 19's origins at the Wuhan lab, and NOT at a wet market. Likewise social media and mainstream liberal media's suppression of the ineffectiveness and dangers of the Covid vaccines, and the science that ACTUALLY CONTRA-INDICATED use of vaccine mandates and lockdowns.
Likewise social media and mainstream liberal media suppression of the known facts about the rigged Nov 2020 presidential election.
Likewise the media's suppression of the true facts about the Jan 6 2021 protests and rioting. SPECIFICALLY: FBI director Jill Sanborn admitted there was NOT ONE firearm confiscated by law enforcement on Jan 6th. There was not "five people KILLED by white racist Trump supporters", Against the mainstream lying narrative, there were ZERO deaths caused by Trump supporters, in fact one officer (Brian Sicknick, a Trump supporter) died of a stroke, and four TRUMP SUPPORTERS ostensibly died of natural causes. But 3 of whom actually may have died from repeatedly being fired upon by police with concussion grenades and tear gas DESPITE that they were just standing there peacefully protesting, two of whom had previously diagnosed fragility to heart attack and stroke issues, and one other had aasthma. And an unarmed 5' 2" Ashley Babbitt was flat-out murdered by unwarranted pistol fire from a Capitol police detective. On top of that, completely suppressed is that then-President Trump in advance ordered 20,000 National Guard to be deployed in the Capitol that day, that Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and DC mayor Muriel Bowser prevented from being deployed, and when THEIR (Schumer, Pelosi, Bowser) actions caused the riot to occur by not preventively deploying National Guard, they very ironically, infuriatingly, accused Trump of "inciting" the rioting, despite that he did everything to prevent it, INCLUDING emphasizing in his speech that day his followers to "PEACEFULLY and patriotically let your voices be heard". And further Twitter-posted at least every 30 minutes throughout the afternoon on Jan 6th for his supporters to "remain peaceful" On top of that, mainstream media and social media suppressed that there were "over 100,000" peaceful demonstrators that day, and only 600 of them went inside the Capitol building. And of those only 10%, about 60, were involved in any violent clashes with police or vandalism or theft. And of those 60, about 20 were John Earle Sullivan's Antifa Salt Lake city group, DISGUISED as Trump supporters, not actual Trump supporters. And another "at least 20" protesters were undercover FBI agents discuised at Trump supporters, as reported in the FBI's own investigation reports in FBI's own internal legal code as as "un-indicted co-conspirators". As reported by continuously for 2 years by RevolverNews, and by veterans publication AmericanGreatness. So at least 40 of the 60 were >>>NOT<<< Trump supporters. And if a majority were NOT actual Trump supporters, can it fairly be described as a riot by Trump supporters? Clearly, it was other groups with ulterior motives, there >>>TO FRAME<<< Trump supporters for their own federal / leftist false-flag operation, staged to discredit Trump and his supporters.
That is one hell of a cluster of false narratives that have been fronted daily by the mainstream media, by FBI, and by allied leftist social media, for two YEARS now. And that's not even a complete list of all the false narratives being fronted by them.
...no one with the slightest common sense would dispute that the 22 networks listed by Newsmax as faavored lower rated liberal channels, ARE, in fact liberal-biased media channels, whether or not they are technically "news" channels. Comedy network for example, is a channel where a lot of under-40 people go for news and current events, going back to the days of Jon Stewart's daily show (and what a lunatic John Stewart has revealed himself to be in recent years). While not technically "news", many low-information voters regard it as a news source.
And as I've said often ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS are likewise liberal-left, and hyper-partisanly so. Reporters have self-identified for 50 years at a ratio of at least 80% as "liberal" and "Very liberal". Across the board. I quote often MRC.org, BIAS by Bernard Goldberg, LEFT TURN by Tim Groseclose, and extensive Pew Research data from the 2008 presidential election (showing that Fox news is the only network that was truly balanced in both positive and negative stories about the 2 candidates, and could only be spun as "right leaning" relative to the extremely left tilt of all the other mainstream liberal networks, that all were overwhelmingly biased for the Democrats and Obama in their coverage.
There's also the lawsuit I linked earlier by OAN against Direct TV and A T & T, that cites executives who are Democrat operatives, who have openly stated their intent to de-platform and eliminate conservative news networks from cable television, so there is no balancing news to break the wall of Democrat propaganda. While this does not eleiminate Newsmax, it overnight slashes their viewership by 13 million nationwide, and marginalizes Newsmax's influence. Despite liberal Yahoo News' spin, that is just a fact. They have taken out and marginalized the two smaller consservative networks, and now they want to eliminate Fox.
![[Linked Image from nypost.com]](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/03/frontcov17.jpg)
![[Linked Image from cardcow.com]](https://www.cardcow.com/images/set395/card00902_fr.jpg)
![[Linked Image from srnnews.com]](https://www.srnnews.com/media/2020/10/1603902604720619mf1sD1wF8A-859x633.jpg)